association_basics.textile 74.0 KB
Newer Older
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
h2. A Guide to Active Record Associations

This guide covers the association features of Active Record. By referring to this guide, you will be able to:

* Declare associations between Active Record models
* Understand the various types of Active Record associations
* Use the methods added to your models by creating associations

endprologue.

h3. Why Associations?

Why do we need associations between models? Because they make common operations simpler and easier in your code. For example, consider a simple Rails application that includes a model for customers and a model for orders. Each customer can have many orders. Without associations, the model declarations would look like this:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
end

class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
end
</ruby>

Now, suppose we wanted to add a new order for an existing customer. We'd need to do something like this:

<ruby>
@order = Order.create(:order_date => Time.now,
  :customer_id => @customer.id)
</ruby>

Or consider deleting a customer, and ensuring that all of its orders get deleted as well:

<ruby>
33
@orders = Order.where(:customer_id => @customer.id)
34 35 36 37 38 39
@orders.each do |order|
  order.destroy
end
@customer.destroy
</ruby>

40
With Active Record associations, we can streamline these -- and other -- operations by declaratively telling Rails that there is a connection between the two models. Here's the revised code for setting up customers and orders:
41 42 43

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
44
  has_many :orders, :dependent => :destroy
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
end

class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer
end
</ruby>

With this change, creating a new order for a particular customer is easier:

<ruby>
@order = @customer.orders.create(:order_date => Time.now)
</ruby>

Deleting a customer and all of its orders is _much_ easier:

<ruby>
@customer.destroy
</ruby>

64
To learn more about the different types of associations, read the next section of this guide. That's followed by some tips and tricks for working with associations, and then by a complete reference to the methods and options for associations in Rails.
65 66 67

h3. The Types of Associations

68
In Rails, an _association_ is a connection between two Active Record models. Associations are implemented using macro-style calls, so that you can declaratively add features to your models. For example, by declaring that one model +belongs_to+ another, you instruct Rails to maintain Primary Key–Foreign Key information between instances of the two models, and you also get a number of utility methods added to your model. Rails supports six types of association:
69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78

* +belongs_to+
* +has_one+
* +has_many+
* +has_many :through+
* +has_one :through+
* +has_and_belongs_to_many+

In the remainder of this guide, you'll learn how to declare and use the various forms of associations. But first, a quick introduction to the situations where each association type is appropriate.

79
h4. The +belongs_to+ Association
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90

A +belongs_to+ association sets up a one-to-one connection with another model, such that each instance of the declaring model "belongs to" one instance of the other model. For example, if your application includes customers and orders, and each order can be assigned to exactly one customer, you'd declare the order model this way:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer
end
</ruby>

!images/belongs_to.png(belongs_to Association Diagram)!

91
h4. The +has_one+ Association
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102

A +has_one+ association also sets up a one-to-one connection with another model, but with somewhat different semantics (and consequences). This association indicates that each instance of a model contains or possesses one instance of another model. For example, if each supplier in your application has only one account, you'd declare the supplier model like this:

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account
end
</ruby>

!images/has_one.png(has_one Association Diagram)!

103
h4. The +has_many+ Association
104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116

A +has_many+ association indicates a one-to-many connection with another model. You'll often find this association on the "other side" of a +belongs_to+ association. This association indicates that each instance of the model has zero or more instances of another model. For example, in an application containing customers and orders, the customer model could be declared like this:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders
end
</ruby>

NOTE: The name of the other model is pluralized when declaring a +has_many+ association.

!images/has_many.png(has_many Association Diagram)!

117
h4. The +has_many :through+ Association
118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139

A +has_many :through+ association is often used to set up a many-to-many connection with another model. This association indicates that the declaring model can be matched with zero or more instances of another model by proceeding _through_ a third model. For example, consider a medical practice where patients make appointments to see physicians. The relevant association declarations could look like this:

<ruby>
class Physician < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :appointments
  has_many :patients, :through => :appointments
end

class Appointment < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :physician
  belongs_to :patient
end

class Patient < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :appointments
  has_many :physicians, :through => :appointments
end
</ruby>

!images/has_many_through.png(has_many :through Association Diagram)!

140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149
The collection of join models can be managed via the API. For example, if you assign

<ruby>
physician.patients = patients
</ruby>

new join models are created for newly associated objects, and if some are gone their rows are deleted.

WARNING: Automatic deletion of join models is direct, no destroy callbacks are triggered.

150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167
The +has_many :through+ association is also useful for setting up "shortcuts" through nested +has_many+ associations. For example, if a document has many sections, and a section has many paragraphs, you may sometimes want to get a simple collection of all paragraphs in the document. You could set that up this way:

<ruby>
class Document < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :sections
  has_many :paragraphs, :through => :sections
end

class Section < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :document
  has_many :paragraphs
end

class Paragraph < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :section
end
</ruby>

168
h4. The +has_one :through+ Association
169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189

A +has_one :through+ association sets up a one-to-one connection with another model. This association indicates that the declaring model can be matched with one instance of another model by proceeding _through_ a third model. For example, if each supplier has one account, and each account is associated with one account history, then the customer model could look like this:

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account
  has_one :account_history, :through => :account
end

class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :supplier
  has_one :account_history
end

class AccountHistory < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :account
end
</ruby>

!images/has_one_through.png(has_one :through Association Diagram)!

190
h4. The +has_and_belongs_to_many+ Association
191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205

A +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association creates a direct many-to-many connection with another model, with no intervening model. For example, if your application includes assemblies and parts, with each assembly having many parts and each part appearing in many assemblies, you could declare the models this way:

<ruby>
class Assembly < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :parts
end

class Part < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies
end
</ruby>

!images/habtm.png(has_and_belongs_to_many Association Diagram)!

206
h4. Choosing Between +belongs_to+ and +has_one+
207

208
If you want to set up a 1–1 relationship between two models, you'll need to add +belongs_to+ to one, and +has_one+ to the other. How do you know which is which?
209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245

The distinction is in where you place the foreign key (it goes on the table for the class declaring the +belongs_to+ association), but you should give some thought to the actual meaning of the data as well. The +has_one+ relationship says that one of something is yours - that is, that something points back to you. For example, it makes more sense to say that a supplier owns an account than that an account owns a supplier. This suggests that the correct relationships are like this:

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account
end

class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :supplier
end
</ruby>

The corresponding migration might look like this:

<ruby>
class CreateSuppliers < ActiveRecord::Migration
  def self.up
    create_table :suppliers do |t|
      t.string  :name
      t.timestamps
    end

    create_table :accounts do |t|
      t.integer :supplier_id
      t.string  :account_number
      t.timestamps
    end
  end

  def self.down
    drop_table :accounts
    drop_table :suppliers
  end
end
</ruby>

246
NOTE: Using +t.integer :supplier_id+ makes the foreign key naming obvious and explicit. In current versions of Rails, you can abstract away this implementation detail by using +t.references :supplier+ instead.
247

248
h4. Choosing Between +has_many :through+ and +has_and_belongs_to_many+
249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280

Rails offers two different ways to declare a many-to-many relationship between models. The simpler way is to use +has_and_belongs_to_many+, which allows you to make the association directly:

<ruby>
class Assembly < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :parts
end

class Part < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies
end
</ruby>

The second way to declare a many-to-many relationship is to use +has_many :through+. This makes the association indirectly, through a join model:

<ruby>
class Assembly < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :manifests
  has_many :parts, :through => :manifests
end

class Manifest < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :assembly
  belongs_to :part
end

class Part < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :manifests
  has_many :assemblies, :through => :manifests
end
</ruby>

281
The simplest rule of thumb is that you should set up a +has_many :through+ relationship if you need to work with the relationship model as an independent entity. If you don't need to do anything with the relationship model, it may be simpler to set up a +has_and_belongs_to_many+ relationship (though you'll need to remember to create the joining table in the database).
282 283 284

You should use +has_many :through+ if you need validations, callbacks, or extra attributes on the join model.

285
h4. Polymorphic Associations
286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331

A slightly more advanced twist on associations is the _polymorphic association_. With polymorphic associations, a model can belong to more than one other model, on a single association. For example, you might have a picture model that belongs to either an employee model or a product model. Here's how this could be declared:

<ruby>
class Picture < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :imageable, :polymorphic => true
end

class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :pictures, :as => :imageable
end

class Product < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :pictures, :as => :imageable
end
</ruby>

You can think of a polymorphic +belongs_to+ declaration as setting up an interface that any other model can use. From an instance of the +Employee+ model, you can retrieve a collection of pictures: +@employee.pictures+.

Similarly, you can retrieve +@product.pictures+.

If you have an instance of the +Picture+ model, you can get to its parent via +@picture.imageable+. To make this work, you need to declare both a foreign key column and a type column in the model that declares the polymorphic interface:

<ruby>
class CreatePictures < ActiveRecord::Migration
  def self.up
    create_table :pictures do |t|
      t.string  :name
      t.integer :imageable_id
      t.string  :imageable_type
      t.timestamps
    end
  end

  def self.down
    drop_table :pictures
  end
end
</ruby>

This migration can be simplified by using the +t.references+ form:

<ruby>
class CreatePictures < ActiveRecord::Migration
  def self.up
    create_table :pictures do |t|
332
      t.string :name
333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345
      t.references :imageable, :polymorphic => true
      t.timestamps
    end
  end

  def self.down
    drop_table :pictures
  end
end
</ruby>

!images/polymorphic.png(Polymorphic Association Diagram)!

346
h4. Self Joins
347

348
In designing a data model, you will sometimes find a model that should have a relation to itself. For example, you may want to store all employees in a single database model, but be able to trace relationships such as between manager and subordinates. This situation can be modeled with self-joining associations:
349 350 351 352

<ruby>
class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :subordinates, :class_name => "Employee",
353
    :foreign_key => "manager_id"
354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368
  belongs_to :manager, :class_name => "Employee"
end
</ruby>

With this setup, you can retrieve +@employee.subordinates+ and +@employee.manager+.

h3. Tips, Tricks, and Warnings

Here are a few things you should know to make efficient use of Active Record associations in your Rails applications:

* Controlling caching
* Avoiding name collisions
* Updating the schema
* Controlling association scope

369
h4. Controlling Caching
370

371
All of the association methods are built around caching, which keeps the result of the most recent query available for further operations. The cache is even shared across methods. For example:
372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387

<ruby>
customer.orders                 # retrieves orders from the database
customer.orders.size            # uses the cached copy of orders
customer.orders.empty?          # uses the cached copy of orders
</ruby>

But what if you want to reload the cache, because data might have been changed by some other part of the application? Just pass +true+ to the association call:

<ruby>
customer.orders                 # retrieves orders from the database
customer.orders.size            # uses the cached copy of orders
customer.orders(true).empty?    # discards the cached copy of orders
                                # and goes back to the database
</ruby>

388
h4. Avoiding Name Collisions
389 390 391

You are not free to use just any name for your associations. Because creating an association adds a method with that name to the model, it is a bad idea to give an association a name that is already used for an instance method of +ActiveRecord::Base+. The association method would override the base method and break things. For instance, +attributes+ or +connection+ are bad names for associations.

392
h4. Updating the Schema
393 394 395

Associations are extremely useful, but they are not magic. You are responsible for maintaining your database schema to match your associations. In practice, this means two things, depending on what sort of associations you are creating. For +belongs_to+ associations you need to create foreign keys, and for +has_and_belongs_to_many+ associations you need to create the appropriate join table.

396
h5. Creating Foreign Keys for +belongs_to+ Associations
397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411

When you declare a +belongs_to+ association, you need to create foreign keys as appropriate. For example, consider this model:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer
end
</ruby>

This declaration needs to be backed up by the proper foreign key declaration on the orders table:

<ruby>
class CreateOrders < ActiveRecord::Migration
  def self.up
    create_table :orders do |t|
412 413 414
      t.datetime :order_date
      t.string   :order_number
      t.integer  :customer_id
415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425
    end
  end

  def self.down
    drop_table :orders
  end
end
</ruby>

If you create an association some time after you build the underlying model, you need to remember to create an +add_column+ migration to provide the necessary foreign key.

426
h5. Creating Join Tables for +has_and_belongs_to_many+ Associations
427

428
If you create a +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association, you need to explicitly create the joining table. Unless the name of the join table is explicitly specified by using the +:join_table+ option, Active Record creates the name by using the lexical order of the class names. So a join between customer and order models will give the default join table name of "customers_orders" because "c" outranks "o" in lexical ordering.
429

430
WARNING: The precedence between model names is calculated using the +&lt;+ operator for +String+. This means that if the strings are of different lengths, and the strings are equal when compared up to the shortest length, then the longer string is considered of higher lexical precedence than the shorter one. For example, one would expect the tables "paper_boxes" and "papers" to generate a join table name of "papers_paper_boxes" because of the length of the name "paper_boxes", but it in fact generates a join table name of "paper_boxes_papers" (because the underscore '_' is lexicographically _less_ than 's' in common encodings).
431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460

Whatever the name, you must manually generate the join table with an appropriate migration. For example, consider these associations:

<ruby>
class Assembly < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :parts
end

class Part < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies
end
</ruby>

These need to be backed up by a migration to create the +assemblies_parts+ table. This table should be created without a primary key:

<ruby>
class CreateAssemblyPartJoinTable < ActiveRecord::Migration
  def self.up
    create_table :assemblies_parts, :id => false do |t|
      t.integer :assembly_id
      t.integer :part_id
    end
  end

  def self.down
    drop_table :assemblies_parts
  end
end
</ruby>

461 462
We pass +:id => false+ to +create_table+ because that table does not represent a model. That's required for the association to work properly. If you observe any strange behaviour in a +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association like mangled models IDs, or exceptions about conflicting IDs chances are you forgot that bit.

463
h4. Controlling Association Scope
464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480

By default, associations look for objects only within the current module's scope. This can be important when you declare Active Record models within a module. For example:

<ruby>
module MyApplication
  module Business
    class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
       has_one :account
    end

    class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
       belongs_to :supplier
    end
  end
end
</ruby>

481
This will work fine, because both the +Supplier+ and the +Account+ class are defined within the same scope. But the following will _not_ work, because +Supplier+ and +Account+ are defined in different scopes:
482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498

<ruby>
module MyApplication
  module Business
    class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
       has_one :account
    end
  end

  module Billing
    class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
       belongs_to :supplier
    end
  end
end
</ruby>

499
To associate a model with a model in a different namespace, you must specify the complete class name in your association declaration:
500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522

<ruby>
module MyApplication
  module Business
    class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
       has_one :account,
        :class_name => "MyApplication::Billing::Account"
    end
  end

  module Billing
    class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
       belongs_to :supplier,
        :class_name => "MyApplication::Business::Supplier"
    end
  end
end
</ruby>

h3. Detailed Association Reference

The following sections give the details of each type of association, including the methods that they add and the options that you can use when declaring an association.

523
h4. +belongs_to+ Association Reference
524 525 526

The +belongs_to+ association creates a one-to-one match with another model. In database terms, this association says that this class contains the foreign key. If the other class contains the foreign key, then you should use +has_one+ instead.

527
h5. Methods Added by +belongs_to+
528

529
When you declare a +belongs_to+ association, the declaring class automatically gains four methods related to the association:
530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552

* <tt><em>association</em>(force_reload = false)</tt>
* <tt><em>association</em>=(associate)</tt>
* <tt>build_<em>association</em>(attributes = {})</tt>
* <tt>create_<em>association</em>(attributes = {})</tt>

In all of these methods, <tt><em>association</em></tt> is replaced with the symbol passed as the first argument to +belongs_to+. For example, given the declaration:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer
end
</ruby>

Each instance of the order model will have these methods:

<ruby>
customer
customer=
build_customer
create_customer
</ruby>

553 554
NOTE: When creating a new +belongs_to+ or +has_one+ association you must use the +build_+ prefix to build the association, rather than the +association.build+ method that would be used for +has_many+ or +has_and_belongs_to_many+ associations. 

555
h6(#belongs_to-association). <tt><em>association</em>(force_reload = false)</tt>
556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564

The <tt><em>association</em></tt> method returns the associated object, if any. If no associated object is found, it returns +nil+.

<ruby>
@customer = @order.customer
</ruby>

If the associated object has already been retrieved from the database for this object, the cached version will be returned. To override this behavior (and force a database read), pass +true+ as the +force_reload+ argument.

565
h6(#belongs_to-association_equal). <tt>_association_=(associate)</tt>
566

A
Andreas Scherer 已提交
567
The <tt><em>association</em>=</tt> method assigns an associated object to this object. Behind the scenes, this means extracting the primary key from the associate object and setting this object's foreign key to the same value.
568 569 570 571 572

<ruby>
@order.customer = @customer
</ruby>

573
h6(#belongs_to-build_association). <tt>build_<em>association</em>(attributes = {})</tt>
574 575 576 577

The <tt>build_<em>association</em></tt> method returns a new object of the associated type. This object will be instantiated from the passed attributes, and the link through this object's foreign key will be set, but the associated object will _not_ yet be saved.

<ruby>
578 579
@customer = @order.build_customer(:customer_number => 123,
  :customer_name => "John Doe")
580 581
</ruby>

582
h6(#belongs_to-create_association). <tt>create_<em>association</em>(attributes = {})</tt>
583 584 585 586

The <tt>create_<em>association</em></tt> method returns a new object of the associated type. This object will be instantiated from the passed attributes, and the link through this object's foreign key will be set. In addition, the associated object _will_ be saved (assuming that it passes any validations).

<ruby>
587 588
@customer = @order.create_customer(:customer_number => 123,
  :customer_name => "John Doe")
589 590
</ruby>

591 592

h5. Options for +belongs_to+
593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614

In many situations, you can use the default behavior of +belongs_to+ without any customization. But despite Rails' emphasis of convention over customization, you can alter that behavior in a number of ways. This section covers the options that you can pass when you create a +belongs_to+ association. For example, an association with several options might look like this:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer, :counter_cache => true,
    :conditions => "active = 1"
end
</ruby>

The +belongs_to+ association supports these options:

* +:autosave+
* +:class_name+
* +:conditions+
* +:counter_cache+
* +:dependent+
* +:foreign_key+
* +:include+
* +:polymorphic+
* +:readonly+
* +:select+
615
* +:touch+
616 617
* +:validate+

618
h6(#belongs_to-autosave). +:autosave+
619 620 621

If you set the +:autosave+ option to +true+, Rails will save any loaded members and destroy members that are marked for destruction whenever you save the parent object.

622
h6(#belongs_to-class_name). +:class_name+
623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631

If the name of the other model cannot be derived from the association name, you can use the +:class_name+ option to supply the model name. For example, if an order belongs to a customer, but the actual name of the model containing customers is +Patron+, you'd set things up this way:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer, :class_name => "Patron"
end
</ruby>

632
h6(#belongs_to-conditions). +:conditions+
633

634
The +:conditions+ option lets you specify the conditions that the associated object must meet (in the syntax used by an SQL +WHERE+ clause).
635 636 637 638 639 640 641

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer, :conditions => "active = 1"
end
</ruby>

642
h6(#belongs_to-counter_cache). +:counter_cache+
643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665

The +:counter_cache+ option can be used to make finding the number of belonging objects more efficient. Consider these models:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer
end
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders
end
</ruby>

With these declarations, asking for the value of +@customer.orders.size+ requires making a call to the database to perform a +COUNT(*)+ query. To avoid this call, you can add a counter cache to the _belonging_ model:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer, :counter_cache => true
end
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders
end
</ruby>

666
With this declaration, Rails will keep the cache value up to date, and then return that value in response to the +size+ method.
667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680

Although the +:counter_cache+ option is specified on the model that includes the +belongs_to+ declaration, the actual column must be added to the _associated_ model. In the case above, you would need to add a column named +orders_count+ to the +Customer+ model. You can override the default column name if you need to:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer, :counter_cache => :count_of_orders
end
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders
end
</ruby>

Counter cache columns are added to the containing model's list of read-only attributes through +attr_readonly+.

681
h6(#belongs_to-dependent). +:dependent+
682

683
If you set the +:dependent+ option to +:destroy+, then deleting this object will call the +destroy+ method on the associated object to delete that object. If you set the +:dependent+ option to +:delete+, then deleting this object will delete the associated object _without_ calling its +destroy+ method.
684 685 686

WARNING: You should not specify this option on a +belongs_to+ association that is connected with a +has_many+ association on the other class. Doing so can lead to orphaned records in your database.

687
h6(#belongs_to-foreign_key). +:foreign_key+
688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699

By convention, Rails guesses that the column used to hold the foreign key on this model is the name of the association with the suffix +_id+ added. The +:foreign_key+ option lets you set the name of the foreign key directly:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer, :class_name => "Patron",
    :foreign_key => "patron_id"
end
</ruby>

TIP: In any case, Rails will not create foreign key columns for you. You need to explicitly define them as part of your migrations.

700
h6(#belongs_to-includes). +:include+
701

702
You can use the +:include+ option to specify second-order associations that should be eager-loaded when this association is used. For example, consider these models:
703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737

<ruby>
class LineItem < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :order
end

class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer
  has_many :line_items
end

class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders
end
</ruby>

If you frequently retrieve customers directly from line items (+@line_item.order.customer+), then you can make your code somewhat more efficient by including customers in the association from line items to orders:

<ruby>
class LineItem < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :order, :include => :customer
end

class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer
  has_many :line_items
end

class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders
end
</ruby>

NOTE: There's no need to use +:include+ for immediate associations - that is, if you have +Order belongs_to :customer+, then the customer is eager-loaded automatically when it's needed.

738
h6(#belongs_to-polymorphic). +:polymorphic+
739

740
Passing +true+ to the +:polymorphic+ option indicates that this is a polymorphic association. Polymorphic associations were discussed in detail <a href="#polymorphic-associations">earlier in this guide</a>.
741

742
h6(#belongs_to-readonly). +:readonly+
743 744 745

If you set the +:readonly+ option to +true+, then the associated object will be read-only when retrieved via the association.

746
h6(#belongs_to-select). +:select+
747 748 749 750 751

The +:select+ option lets you override the SQL +SELECT+ clause that is used to retrieve data about the associated object. By default, Rails retrieves all columns.

TIP: If you set the +:select+ option on a +belongs_to+ association, you should also set the +foreign_key+ option to guarantee the correct results.

752
h6(#belongs_to-touch). +:touch+
753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773

If you set the +:touch+ option to +:true+, then the +updated_at+ or +updated_on+ timestamp on the associated object will be set to the current time whenever this object is saved or destroyed:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer, :touch => true
end

class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders
end
</ruby>

In this case, saving or destroying an order will update the timestamp on the associated customer. You can also specify a particular timestamp attribute to update:

<ruby>
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer, :touch => :orders_updated_at
end
</ruby>

774
h6(#belongs_to-validate). +:validate+
775 776 777

If you set the +:validate+ option to +true+, then associated objects will be validated whenever you save this object. By default, this is +false+: associated objects will not be validated when this object is saved.

778
h5(#belongs_to-how_to_know_whether_theres_an_associated_object). How To Know Whether There's an Associated Object?
779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787

To know whether there's and associated object just check <tt><em>association</em>.nil?</tt>:

<ruby>
if @order.customer.nil?
  @msg = "No customer found for this order"
end
</ruby>

788
h5(#belongs_to-when_are_objects_saved). When are Objects Saved?
789 790 791

Assigning an object to a +belongs_to+ association does _not_ automatically save the object. It does not save the associated object either.

792
h4. +has_one+ Association Reference
793 794 795

The +has_one+ association creates a one-to-one match with another model. In database terms, this association says that the other class contains the foreign key. If this class contains the foreign key, then you should use +belongs_to+ instead.

796
h5. Methods Added by +has_one+
797

798
When you declare a +has_one+ association, the declaring class automatically gains four methods related to the association:
799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821

* <tt><em>association</em>(force_reload = false)</tt>
* <tt><em>association</em>=(associate)</tt>
* <tt>build_<em>association</em>(attributes = {})</tt>
* <tt>create_<em>association</em>(attributes = {})</tt>

In all of these methods, <tt><em>association</em></tt> is replaced with the symbol passed as the first argument to +has_one+. For example, given the declaration:

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account
end
</ruby>

Each instance of the +Supplier+ model will have these methods:

<ruby>
account
account=
build_account
create_account
</ruby>

822 823
NOTE: When creating a new +has_one+ or +belongs_to+ association you must use the +build_+ prefix to build the association, rather than the +association.build+ method that would be used for +has_many+ or +has_and_belongs_to_many+ associations. 

824
h6(#has_one-association). <tt><em>association</em>(force_reload = false)</tt>
825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833

The <tt><em>association</em></tt> method returns the associated object, if any. If no associated object is found, it returns +nil+.

<ruby>
@account = @supplier.account
</ruby>

If the associated object has already been retrieved from the database for this object, the cached version will be returned. To override this behavior (and force a database read), pass +true+ as the +force_reload+ argument.

834
h6(#has_one-association_equal). <tt><em>association</em>=(associate)</tt>
835 836 837 838 839 840 841

The <tt><em>association</em>=</tt> method assigns an associated object to this object. Behind the scenes, this means extracting the primary key from this object and setting the associate object's foreign key to the same value.

<ruby>
@supplier.account = @account
</ruby>

842
h6(#has_one-build_association). <tt>build_<em>association</em>(attributes = {})</tt>
843 844 845 846

The <tt>build_<em>association</em></tt> method returns a new object of the associated type. This object will be instantiated from the passed attributes, and the link through its foreign key will be set, but the associated object will _not_ yet be saved.

<ruby>
847
@account = @supplier.build_account(:terms => "Net 30")
848 849
</ruby>

850
h6(#has_one-create_association). <tt>create_<em>association</em>(attributes = {})</tt>
851 852 853 854

The <tt>create_<em>association</em></tt> method returns a new object of the associated type. This object will be instantiated from the passed attributes, and the link through its foreign key will be set. In addition, the associated object _will_ be saved (assuming that it passes any validations).

<ruby>
855
@account = @supplier.create_account(:terms => "Net 30")
856 857
</ruby>

858
h5. Options for +has_one+
859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885

In many situations, you can use the default behavior of +has_one+ without any customization. But despite Rails' emphasis of convention over customization, you can alter that behavior in a number of ways. This section covers the options that you can pass when you create a +has_one+ association. For example, an association with several options might look like this:

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account, :class_name => "Billing", :dependent => :nullify
end
</ruby>

The +has_one+ association supports these options:

* +:as+
* +:autosave+
* +:class_name+
* +:conditions+
* +:dependent+
* +:foreign_key+
* +:include+
* +:order+
* +:primary_key+
* +:readonly+
* +:select+
* +:source+
* +:source_type+
* +:through+
* +:validate+

886
h6(#has_one-as). +:as+
887

888
Setting the +:as+ option indicates that this is a polymorphic association. Polymorphic associations were discussed in detail <a href="#polymorphic-associations">earlier in this guide</a>.
889

890
h6(#has_one-autosave). +:autosave+
891 892 893

If you set the +:autosave+ option to +true+, Rails will save any loaded members and destroy members that are marked for destruction whenever you save the parent object.

894
h6(#has_one-class_name). +:class_name+
895

896
If the name of the other model cannot be derived from the association name, you can use the +:class_name+ option to supply the model name. For example, if a supplier has an account, but the actual name of the model containing accounts is +Billing+, you'd set things up this way:
897 898 899 900 901 902 903

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account, :class_name => "Billing"
end
</ruby>

904
h6(#has_one-conditions). +:conditions+
905

906
The +:conditions+ option lets you specify the conditions that the associated object must meet (in the syntax used by an SQL +WHERE+ clause).
907 908 909 910 911 912 913

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account, :conditions => "confirmed = 1"
end
</ruby>

914
h6(#has_one-dependent). +:dependent+
915

916
If you set the +:dependent+ option to +:destroy+, then deleting this object will call the +destroy+ method on the associated object to delete that object. If you set the +:dependent+ option to +:delete+, then deleting this object will delete the associated object _without_ calling its +destroy+ method. If you set the +:dependent+ option to +:nullify+, then deleting this object will set the foreign key in the association object to +NULL+.
917

918
h6(#has_one-foreign_key). +:foreign_key+
919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929

By convention, Rails guesses that the column used to hold the foreign key on the other model is the name of this model with the suffix +_id+ added. The +:foreign_key+ option lets you set the name of the foreign key directly:

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account, :foreign_key => "supp_id"
end
</ruby>

TIP: In any case, Rails will not create foreign key columns for you. You need to explicitly define them as part of your migrations.

930
h6(#has_one-include). +:include+
931

932
You can use the +:include+ option to specify second-order associations that should be eager-loaded when this association is used. For example, consider these models:
933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account
end

class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :supplier
  belongs_to :representative
end

class Representative < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :accounts
end
</ruby>

If you frequently retrieve representatives directly from suppliers (+@supplier.account.representative+), then you can make your code somewhat more efficient by including representatives in the association from suppliers to accounts:

<ruby>
class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account, :include => :representative
end

class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :supplier
  belongs_to :representative
end

class Representative < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :accounts
end
</ruby>

966
h6(#has_one-order). +:order+
967

968
The +:order+ option dictates the order in which associated objects will be received (in the syntax used by an SQL +ORDER BY+ clause). Because a +has_one+ association will only retrieve a single associated object, this option should not be needed.
969

970
h6(#has_one-primary_key). +:primary_key+
971 972 973

By convention, Rails guesses that the column used to hold the primary key of this model is +id+. You can override this and explicitly specify the primary key with the +:primary_key+ option.

974
h6(#has_one-readonly). +:readonly+
975 976 977

If you set the +:readonly+ option to +true+, then the associated object will be read-only when retrieved via the association.

978
h6(#has_one-select). +:select+
979 980 981

The +:select+ option lets you override the SQL +SELECT+ clause that is used to retrieve data about the associated object. By default, Rails retrieves all columns.

982
h6(#has_one-source). +:source+
983 984 985

The +:source+ option specifies the source association name for a +has_one :through+ association.

986
h6(#has_one-source_type). +:source_type+
987 988 989

The +:source_type+ option specifies the source association type for a +has_one :through+ association that proceeds through a polymorphic association.

990
h6(#has_one-through). +:through+
991

992
The +:through+ option specifies a join model through which to perform the query. +has_one :through+ associations were discussed in detail <a href="#the-has_one-through-association">earlier in this guide</a>.
993

994
h6(#has_one-validate). +:validate+
995 996 997

If you set the +:validate+ option to +true+, then associated objects will be validated whenever you save this object. By default, this is +false+: associated objects will not be validated when this object is saved.

998
h5(#has_one-how_to_know_whether_theres_an_associated_object). How To Know Whether There's an Associated Object?
999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007

To know whether there's and associated object just check <tt><em>association</em>.nil?</tt>:

<ruby>
if @supplier.account.nil?
  @msg = "No account found for this supplier"
end
</ruby>

1008
h5(#has_one-when_are_objects_saved). When are Objects Saved?
1009 1010 1011 1012 1013

When you assign an object to a +has_one+ association, that object is automatically saved (in order to update its foreign key). In addition, any object being replaced is also automatically saved, because its foreign key will change too.

If either of these saves fails due to validation errors, then the assignment statement returns +false+ and the assignment itself is cancelled.

1014
If the parent object (the one declaring the +has_one+ association) is unsaved (that is, +new_record?+ returns +true+) then the child objects are not saved. They will automatically when the parent object is saved.
1015 1016 1017

If you want to assign an object to a +has_one+ association without saving the object, use the <tt><em>association</em>.build</tt> method.

1018
h4. +has_many+ Association Reference
1019 1020 1021

The +has_many+ association creates a one-to-many relationship with another model. In database terms, this association says that the other class will have a foreign key that refers to instances of this class.

1022
h5. Methods Added by +has_many+
1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035

When you declare a +has_many+ association, the declaring class automatically gains 13 methods related to the association:

* <tt><em>collection</em>(force_reload = false)</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em><<(object, ...)</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.delete(object, ...)</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>=objects</tt>
* <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids</tt>
* <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids=ids</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.clear</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.empty?</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.size</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.find(...)</tt>
1036
* <tt><em>collection</em>.where(...)</tt>
1037
* <tt><em>collection</em>.exists?(...)</tt>
1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061
* <tt><em>collection</em>.build(attributes = {}, ...)</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.create(attributes = {})</tt>

In all of these methods, <tt><em>collection</em></tt> is replaced with the symbol passed as the first argument to +has_many+, and <tt><em>collection_singular</em></tt> is replaced with the singularized version of that symbol.. For example, given the declaration:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders
end
</ruby>

Each instance of the customer model will have these methods:

<ruby>
orders(force_reload = false)
orders<<(object, ...)
orders.delete(object, ...)
orders=objects
order_ids
order_ids=ids
orders.clear
orders.empty?
orders.size
orders.find(...)
1062
orders.where(...)
1063
orders.exists?(...)
1064 1065 1066 1067
orders.build(attributes = {}, ...)
orders.create(attributes = {})
</ruby>

1068
h6(#has_many-collection). <tt><em>collection</em>(force_reload = false)</tt>
1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075

The <tt><em>collection</em></tt> method returns an array of all of the associated objects. If there are no associated objects, it returns an empty array.

<ruby>
@orders = @customer.orders
</ruby>

1076
h6(#has_many-collection-lt_lt). <tt><em>collection</em><<(object, ...)</tt>
1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083

The <tt><em>collection</em><<</tt> method adds one or more objects to the collection by setting their foreign keys to the primary key of the calling model.

<ruby>
@customer.orders << @order1
</ruby>

1084
h6(#has_many-collection-delete). <tt><em>collection</em>.delete(object, ...)</tt>
1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091

The <tt><em>collection</em>.delete</tt> method removes one or more objects from the collection by setting their foreign keys to +NULL+.

<ruby>
@customer.orders.delete(@order1)
</ruby>

1092
WARNING: Additionally, objects will be destroyed if they're associated with +:dependent => :destroy+, and deleted if they're associated with +:dependent => :delete_all+.
1093 1094


1095
h6(#has_many-collection-equal). <tt><em>collection</em>=objects</tt>
1096

1097
The <tt><em>collection</em>=</tt> method makes the collection contain only the supplied objects, by adding and deleting as appropriate.
1098

1099
h6(#has_many-collection_singular). <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids</tt>
1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106

The <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids</tt> method returns an array of the ids of the objects in the collection.

<ruby>
@order_ids = @customer.order_ids
</ruby>

1107
h6(#has_many-collection_singular_ids_ids). <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids=ids</tt>
1108 1109 1110

The <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids=</tt> method makes the collection contain only the objects identified by the supplied primary key values, by adding and deleting as appropriate.

1111
h6(#has_many-collection-clear). <tt><em>collection</em>.clear</tt>
1112 1113 1114

The <tt><em>collection</em>.clear</tt> method removes every object from the collection. This destroys the associated objects if they are associated with +:dependent => :destroy+, deletes them directly from the database if +:dependent => :delete_all+, and otherwise sets their foreign keys to +NULL+.

1115
h6(#has_many-collection-empty). <tt><em>collection</em>.empty?</tt>
1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124

The <tt><em>collection</em>.empty?</tt> method returns +true+ if the collection does not contain any associated objects.

<ruby>
<% if @customer.orders.empty? %>
  No Orders Found
<% end %>
</ruby>

1125
h6(#has_many-collection-size). <tt><em>collection</em>.size</tt>
1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132

The <tt><em>collection</em>.size</tt> method returns the number of objects in the collection.

<ruby>
@order_count = @customer.orders.size
</ruby>

1133
h6(#has_many-collection-find). <tt><em>collection</em>.find(...)</tt>
1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140

The <tt><em>collection</em>.find</tt> method finds objects within the collection. It uses the same syntax and options as +ActiveRecord::Base.find+.

<ruby>
@open_orders = @customer.orders.find(:all, :conditions => "open = 1")
</ruby>

1141
NOTE: Starting Rails 3, supplying options to +ActiveRecord::Base.find+ method is discouraged. Use <tt><em>collection</em>.where</tt> instead when you need to pass conditions.
1142

1143
h6(#has_many-collection-where). <tt><em>collection</em>.where(...)</tt>
1144 1145 1146 1147

The <tt><em>collection</em>.where</tt> method finds objects within the collection based on the conditions supplied but the objects are loaded lazily meaning that the database is queried only when the object(s) are accessed.

<ruby>
1148 1149
@open_orders = @customer.orders.where(:open => true) # No query yet
@open_order = @open_orders.first # Now the database will be queried
1150 1151 1152
</ruby>

h6(#has_many-collection-exists). <tt><em>collection</em>.exists?(...)</tt>
1153

1154
The <tt><em>collection</em>.exists?</tt> method checks whether an object meeting the supplied conditions exists in the collection. It uses the same syntax and options as +ActiveRecord::Base.exists?+.
1155

1156
h6(#has_many-collection-build). <tt><em>collection</em>.build(attributes = {}, ...)</tt>
1157 1158 1159 1160

The <tt><em>collection</em>.build</tt> method returns one or more new objects of the associated type. These objects will be instantiated from the passed attributes, and the link through their foreign key will be created, but the associated objects will _not_ yet be saved.

<ruby>
1161 1162
@order = @customer.orders.build(:order_date => Time.now,
  :order_number => "A12345")
1163 1164
</ruby>

1165
h6(#has_many-collection-create). <tt><em>collection</em>.create(attributes = {})</tt>
1166 1167 1168 1169

The <tt><em>collection</em>.create</tt> method returns a new object of the associated type. This object will be instantiated from the passed attributes, the link through its foreign key will be created, and the associated object _will_ be saved (assuming that it passes any validations).

<ruby>
1170 1171
@order = @customer.orders.create(:order_date => Time.now,
  :order_number => "A12345")
1172 1173
</ruby>

1174
h5. Options for +has_many+
1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208

In many situations, you can use the default behavior for +has_many+ without any customization. But you can alter that behavior in a number of ways. This section covers the options that you can pass when you create a +has_many+ association. For example, an association with several options might look like this:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders, :dependent => :delete_all, :validate => :false
end
</ruby>

The +has_many+ association supports these options:

* +:as+
* +:autosave+
* +:class_name+
* +:conditions+
* +:counter_sql+
* +:dependent+
* +:extend+
* +:finder_sql+
* +:foreign_key+
* +:group+
* +:include+
* +:limit+
* +:offset+
* +:order+
* +:primary_key+
* +:readonly+
* +:select+
* +:source+
* +:source_type+
* +:through+
* +:uniq+
* +:validate+

1209
h6(#has_many-as). +:as+
1210

1211
Setting the +:as+ option indicates that this is a polymorphic association, as discussed <a href="#polymorphic-associations">earlier in this guide</a>.
1212

1213
h6(#has_many-autosave). +:autosave+
1214 1215 1216

If you set the +:autosave+ option to +true+, Rails will save any loaded members and destroy members that are marked for destruction whenever you save the parent object.

1217
h6(#has_many-class_name). +:class_name+
1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226

If the name of the other model cannot be derived from the association name, you can use the +:class_name+ option to supply the model name. For example, if a customer has many orders, but the actual name of the model containing orders is +Transaction+, you'd set things up this way:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders, :class_name => "Transaction"
end
</ruby>

1227
h6(#has_many-conditions). +:conditions+
1228

1229
The +:conditions+ option lets you specify the conditions that the associated object must meet (in the syntax used by an SQL +WHERE+ clause).
1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :confirmed_orders, :class_name => "Order",
    :conditions => "confirmed = 1"
end
</ruby>

You can also set conditions via a hash:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :confirmed_orders, :class_name => "Order",
    :conditions => { :confirmed => true }
end
</ruby>

If you use a hash-style +:conditions+ option, then record creation via this association will be automatically scoped using the hash. In this case, using +@customer.confirmed_orders.create+ or +@customer.confirmed_orders.build+ will create orders where the confirmed column has the value +true+.

P
Pratik Naik 已提交
1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259
If you need to evaluate conditions dynamically at runtime, you could use string interpolation in single quotes:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :latest_orders, :class_name => "Order",
    :conditions => 'orders.created_at > #{10.hours.ago.to_s(:db).inspect}'
end
</ruby>

Be sure to use single quotes.

1260
h6(#has_many-counter_sql). +:counter_sql+
1261 1262 1263 1264 1265

Normally Rails automatically generates the proper SQL to count the association members. With the +:counter_sql+ option, you can specify a complete SQL statement to count them yourself.

NOTE: If you specify +:finder_sql+ but not +:counter_sql+, then the counter SQL will be generated by substituting +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM+ for the +SELECT ... FROM+ clause of your +:finder_sql+ statement.

1266
h6(#has_many-dependent). +:dependent+
1267

1268
If you set the +:dependent+ option to +:destroy+, then deleting this object will call the +destroy+ method on the associated objects to delete those objects. If you set the +:dependent+ option to +:delete_all+, then deleting this object will delete the associated objects _without_ calling their +destroy+ method. If you set the +:dependent+ option to +:nullify+, then deleting this object will set the foreign key in the associated objects to +NULL+.
1269 1270 1271

NOTE: This option is ignored when you use the +:through+ option on the association.

1272
h6(#has_many-extend). +:extend+
1273

1274
The +:extend+ option specifies a named module to extend the association proxy. Association extensions are discussed in detail <a href="#association-extensions">later in this guide</a>.
1275

1276
h6(#has_many-finder_sql). +:finder_sql+
1277 1278 1279

Normally Rails automatically generates the proper SQL to fetch the association members. With the +:finder_sql+ option, you can specify a complete SQL statement to fetch them yourself. If fetching objects requires complex multi-table SQL, this may be necessary.

1280
h6(#has_many-foreign_key). +:foreign_key+
1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291

By convention, Rails guesses that the column used to hold the foreign key on the other model is the name of this model with the suffix +_id+ added. The +:foreign_key+ option lets you set the name of the foreign key directly:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders, :foreign_key => "cust_id"
end
</ruby>

TIP: In any case, Rails will not create foreign key columns for you. You need to explicitly define them as part of your migrations.

1292
h6(#has_many-group). +:group+
1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301

The +:group+ option supplies an attribute name to group the result set by, using a +GROUP BY+ clause in the finder SQL.

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :line_items, :through => :orders, :group => "orders.id"
end
</ruby>

1302
h6(#has_many-include). +:include+
1303

1304
You can use the +:include+ option to specify second-order associations that should be eager-loaded when this association is used. For example, consider these models:
1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders
end

class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer
  has_many :line_items
end

class LineItem < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :order
end
</ruby>

If you frequently retrieve line items directly from customers (+@customer.orders.line_items+), then you can make your code somewhat more efficient by including line items in the association from customers to orders:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders, :include => :line_items
end

class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :customer
  has_many :line_items
end

class LineItem < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :order
end
</ruby>

1338
h6(#has_many-limit). +:limit+
1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348

The +:limit+ option lets you restrict the total number of objects that will be fetched through an association.

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :recent_orders, :class_name => "Order",
    :order => "order_date DESC", :limit => 100
end
</ruby>

1349
h6(#has_many-offset). +:offset+
1350 1351 1352

The +:offset+ option lets you specify the starting offset for fetching objects via an association. For example, if you set +:offset => 11+, it will skip the first 11 records.

1353
h6(#has_many-order). +:order+
1354

1355
The +:order+ option dictates the order in which associated objects will be received (in the syntax used by an SQL +ORDER BY+ clause).
1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders, :order => "date_confirmed DESC"
end
</ruby>

1363
h6(#has_many-primary_key). +:primary_key+
1364

1365
By convention, Rails guesses that the column used to hold the primary key of the association is +id+. You can override this and explicitly specify the primary key with the +:primary_key+ option.
1366

1367
h6(#has_many-readonly). +:readonly+
1368 1369 1370

If you set the +:readonly+ option to +true+, then the associated objects will be read-only when retrieved via the association.

1371
h6(#has_many-select). +:select+
1372 1373 1374 1375 1376

The +:select+ option lets you override the SQL +SELECT+ clause that is used to retrieve data about the associated objects. By default, Rails retrieves all columns.

WARNING: If you specify your own +:select+, be sure to include the primary key and foreign key columns of the associated model. If you do not, Rails will throw an error.

1377
h6(#has_many-source). +:source+
1378 1379 1380

The +:source+ option specifies the source association name for a +has_many :through+ association. You only need to use this option if the name of the source association cannot be automatically inferred from the association name.

1381
h6(#has_many-source_type). +:source_type+
1382 1383 1384

The +:source_type+ option specifies the source association type for a +has_many :through+ association that proceeds through a polymorphic association.

1385
h6(#has_many-through). +:through+
1386

1387
The +:through+ option specifies a join model through which to perform the query. +has_many :through+ associations provide a way to implement many-to-many relationships, as discussed <a href="#the-has_many-through-association">earlier in this guide</a>.
1388

1389
h6(#has_many-uniq). +:uniq+
1390

1391
Set the +:uniq+ option to true to keep the collection free of duplicates. This is mostly useful together with the +:through+ option.
1392 1393 1394

<ruby>
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
1395 1396
  has_many :readings
  has_many :posts, :through => :readings
1397
end
1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404

person = Person.create(:name => 'john')
post   = Post.create(:name => 'a1')
person.posts << post
person.posts << post
person.posts.inspect # => [#<Post id: 5, name: "a1">, #<Post id: 5, name: "a1">]
Reading.all.inspect  # => [#<Reading id: 12, person_id: 5, post_id: 5>, #<Reading id: 13, person_id: 5, post_id: 5>]
1405 1406
</ruby>

1407
In the above case there are two readings and +person.posts+ brings out both of them even though these records are pointing to the same post.
1408

1409
Now let's set +:uniq+ to true:
1410 1411 1412

<ruby>
class Person
1413 1414
  has_many :readings
  has_many :posts, :through => :readings, :uniq => true
1415
end
1416 1417 1418 1419 1420

person = Person.create(:name => 'honda')
post   = Post.create(:name => 'a1')
person.posts << post
person.posts << post
1421 1422
person.posts.inspect # => [#<Post id: 7, name: "a1">]
Reading.all.inspect  # => [#<Reading id: 16, person_id: 7, post_id: 7>, #<Reading id: 17, person_id: 7, post_id: 7>]
1423 1424
</ruby>

1425
In the above case there are still two readings. However +person.posts+ shows only one post because the collection loads only unique records.
1426

1427
h6(#has_many-validate). +:validate+
1428 1429 1430

If you set the +:validate+ option to +false+, then associated objects will not be validated whenever you save this object. By default, this is +true+: associated objects will be validated when this object is saved.

1431
h5(#has_many-when_are_objects_saved). When are Objects Saved?
1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440

When you assign an object to a +has_many+ association, that object is automatically saved (in order to update its foreign key). If you assign multiple objects in one statement, then they are all saved.

If any of these saves fails due to validation errors, then the assignment statement returns +false+ and the assignment itself is cancelled.

If the parent object (the one declaring the +has_many+ association) is unsaved (that is, +new_record?+ returns +true+) then the child objects are not saved when they are added. All unsaved members of the association will automatically be saved when the parent is saved.

If you want to assign an object to a +has_many+ association without saving the object, use the <tt><em>collection</em>.build</tt> method.

1441
h4. +has_and_belongs_to_many+ Association Reference
1442 1443 1444

The +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association creates a many-to-many relationship with another model. In database terms, this associates two classes via an intermediate join table that includes foreign keys referring to each of the classes.

1445
h5. Methods Added by +has_and_belongs_to_many+
1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458

When you declare a +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association, the declaring class automatically gains 13 methods related to the association:

* <tt><em>collection</em>(force_reload = false)</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em><<(object, ...)</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.delete(object, ...)</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>=objects</tt>
* <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids</tt>
* <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids=ids</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.clear</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.empty?</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.size</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.find(...)</tt>
1459
* <tt><em>collection</em>.where(...)</tt>
1460
* <tt><em>collection</em>.exists?(...)</tt>
1461 1462 1463
* <tt><em>collection</em>.build(attributes = {})</tt>
* <tt><em>collection</em>.create(attributes = {})</tt>

1464
In all of these methods, <tt><em>collection</em></tt> is replaced with the symbol passed as the first argument to +has_and_belongs_to_many+, and <tt><em>collection_singular</em></tt> is replaced with the singularized version of that symbol. For example, given the declaration:
1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484

<ruby>
class Part < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies
end
</ruby>

Each instance of the part model will have these methods:

<ruby>
assemblies(force_reload = false)
assemblies<<(object, ...)
assemblies.delete(object, ...)
assemblies=objects
assembly_ids
assembly_ids=ids
assemblies.clear
assemblies.empty?
assemblies.size
assemblies.find(...)
1485
assemblies.where(...)
1486
assemblies.exists?(...)
1487 1488 1489 1490
assemblies.build(attributes = {}, ...)
assemblies.create(attributes = {})
</ruby>

1491
h6. Additional Column Methods
1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497

If the join table for a +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association has additional columns beyond the two foreign keys, these columns will be added as attributes to records retrieved via that association. Records returned with additional attributes will always be read-only, because Rails cannot save changes to those attributes.

WARNING: The use of extra attributes on the join table in a +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association is deprecated. If you require this sort of complex behavior on the table that joins two models in a many-to-many relationship, you should use a +has_many :through+ association instead of +has_and_belongs_to_many+.


1498
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection). <tt><em>collection</em>(force_reload = false)</tt>
1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505

The <tt><em>collection</em></tt> method returns an array of all of the associated objects. If there are no associated objects, it returns an empty array.

<ruby>
@assemblies = @part.assemblies
</ruby>

1506
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-lt_lt). <tt><em>collection</em><<(object, ...)</tt>
1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515

The <tt><em>collection</em><<</tt> method adds one or more objects to the collection by creating records in the join table.

<ruby>
@part.assemblies << @assembly1
</ruby>

NOTE: This method is aliased as <tt><em>collection</em>.concat</tt> and <tt><em>collection</em>.push</tt>.

1516
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-delete). <tt><em>collection</em>.delete(object, ...)</tt>
1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523

The <tt><em>collection</em>.delete</tt> method removes one or more objects from the collection by deleting records in the join table. This does not destroy the objects.

<ruby>
@part.assemblies.delete(@assembly1)
</ruby>

1524
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-equal). <tt><em>collection</em>=objects</tt>
1525 1526 1527

The <tt><em>collection</em>=</tt> method makes the collection contain only the supplied objects, by adding and deleting as appropriate.

1528
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection_singular). <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids</tt>
1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535

The <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids</tt> method returns an array of the ids of the objects in the collection.

<ruby>
@assembly_ids = @part.assembly_ids
</ruby>

1536
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection_singular_ids_ids). <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids=ids</tt>
1537 1538 1539

The <tt><em>collection_singular</em>_ids=</tt> method makes the collection contain only the objects identified by the supplied primary key values, by adding and deleting as appropriate.

1540
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-clear). <tt><em>collection</em>.clear</tt>
1541

1542
The <tt><em>collection</em>.clear</tt> method removes every object from the collection by deleting the rows from the joining table. This does not destroy the associated objects.
1543

1544
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-empty). <tt><em>collection</em>.empty?</tt>
1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553

The <tt><em>collection</em>.empty?</tt> method returns +true+ if the collection does not contain any associated objects.

<ruby>
<% if @part.assemblies.empty? %>
  This part is not used in any assemblies
<% end %>
</ruby>

1554
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-size). <tt><em>collection</em>.size</tt>
1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561

The <tt><em>collection</em>.size</tt> method returns the number of objects in the collection.

<ruby>
@assembly_count = @part.assemblies.size
</ruby>

1562
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-find). <tt><em>collection</em>.find(...)</tt>
1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570

The <tt><em>collection</em>.find</tt> method finds objects within the collection. It uses the same syntax and options as +ActiveRecord::Base.find+. It also adds the additional condition that the object must be in the collection.

<ruby>
@new_assemblies = @part.assemblies.find(:all,
  :conditions => ["created_at > ?", 2.days.ago])
</ruby>

1571
NOTE: Starting Rails 3, supplying options to +ActiveRecord::Base.find+ method is discouraged. Use <tt><em>collection</em>.where</tt> instead when you need to pass conditions.
1572

1573
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-where). <tt><em>collection</em>.where(...)</tt>
1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580

The <tt><em>collection</em>.where</tt> method finds objects within the collection based on the conditions supplied but the objects are loaded lazily meaning that the database is queried only when the object(s) are accessed. It also adds the additional condition that the object must be in the collection.

<ruby>
@new_assemblies = @part.assemblies.where("created_at > ?", 2.days.ago)
</ruby>

1581
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-exists). <tt><em>collection</em>.exists?(...)</tt>
1582

1583
The <tt><em>collection</em>.exists?</tt> method checks whether an object meeting the supplied conditions exists in the collection. It uses the same syntax and options as +ActiveRecord::Base.exists?+.
1584

1585
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-collection-build). <tt><em>collection</em>.build(attributes = {})</tt>
1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593

The <tt><em>collection</em>.build</tt> method returns a new object of the associated type. This object will be instantiated from the passed attributes, and the link through the join table will be created, but the associated object will _not_ yet be saved.

<ruby>
@assembly = @part.assemblies.build(
  {:assembly_name => "Transmission housing"})
</ruby>

1594
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-create-attributes). <tt><em>collection</em>.create(attributes = {})</tt>
1595

1596
The <tt><em>collection</em>.create</tt> method returns a new object of the associated type. This object will be instantiated from the passed attributes, the link through the join table will be created, and the associated object _will_ be saved (assuming that it passes any validations).
1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602

<ruby>
@assembly = @part.assemblies.create(
  {:assembly_name => "Transmission housing"})
</ruby>

1603
h5. Options for +has_and_belongs_to_many+
1604

1605
In many situations, you can use the default behavior for +has_and_belongs_to_many+ without any customization. But you can alter that behavior in a number of ways. This section covers the options that you can pass when you create a +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association. For example, an association with several options might look like this:
1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636

<ruby>
class Parts < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies, :uniq => true,
    :read_only => true
end
</ruby>

The +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association supports these options:

* +:association_foreign_key+
* +:autosave+
* +:class_name+
* +:conditions+
* +:counter_sql+
* +:delete_sql+
* +:extend+
* +:finder_sql+
* +:foreign_key+
* +:group+
* +:include+
* +:insert_sql+
* +:join_table+
* +:limit+
* +:offset+
* +:order+
* +:readonly+
* +:select+
* +:uniq+
* +:validate+

1637
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-association_foreign_key). +:association_foreign_key+
1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650

By convention, Rails guesses that the column in the join table used to hold the foreign key pointing to the other model is the name of that model with the suffix +_id+ added. The +:association_foreign_key+ option lets you set the name of the foreign key directly:

TIP: The +:foreign_key+ and +:association_foreign_key+ options are useful when setting up a many-to-many self-join. For example:

<ruby>
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :friends, :class_name => "User",
    :foreign_key => "this_user_id",
    :association_foreign_key => "other_user_id"
end
</ruby>

1651
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-autosave). +:autosave+
1652 1653 1654

If you set the +:autosave+ option to +true+, Rails will save any loaded members and destroy members that are marked for destruction whenever you save the parent object.

1655
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-class_name). +:class_name+
1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664

If the name of the other model cannot be derived from the association name, you can use the +:class_name+ option to supply the model name. For example, if a part has many assemblies, but the actual name of the model containing assemblies is +Gadget+, you'd set things up this way:

<ruby>
class Parts < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies, :class_name => "Gadget"
end
</ruby>

1665
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-conditions). +:conditions+
1666

1667
The +:conditions+ option lets you specify the conditions that the associated object must meet (in the syntax used by an SQL +WHERE+ clause).
1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684

<ruby>
class Parts < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies,
    :conditions => "factory = 'Seattle'"
end
</ruby>

You can also set conditions via a hash:

<ruby>
class Parts < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies,
    :conditions => { :factory => 'Seattle' }
end
</ruby>

1685
If you use a hash-style +:conditions+ option, then record creation via this association will be automatically scoped using the hash. In this case, using +@parts.assemblies.create+ or +@parts.assemblies.build+ will create orders where the +factory+ column has the value "Seattle".
1686

1687
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-counter_sql). +:counter_sql+
1688 1689 1690 1691 1692

Normally Rails automatically generates the proper SQL to count the association members. With the +:counter_sql+ option, you can specify a complete SQL statement to count them yourself.

NOTE: If you specify +:finder_sql+ but not +:counter_sql+, then the counter SQL will be generated by substituting +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM+ for the +SELECT ... FROM+ clause of your +:finder_sql+ statement.

1693
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-delete_sql). +:delete_sql+
1694 1695 1696

Normally Rails automatically generates the proper SQL to remove links between the associated classes. With the +:delete_sql+ option, you can specify a complete SQL statement to delete them yourself.

1697
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-extend). +:extend+
1698

1699
The +:extend+ option specifies a named module to extend the association proxy. Association extensions are discussed in detail <a href="#association-extensions">later in this guide</a>.
1700

1701
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-finder_sql). +:finder_sql+
1702 1703 1704

Normally Rails automatically generates the proper SQL to fetch the association members. With the +:finder_sql+ option, you can specify a complete SQL statement to fetch them yourself. If fetching objects requires complex multi-table SQL, this may be necessary.

1705
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-foreign_key). +:foreign_key+
1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716

By convention, Rails guesses that the column in the join table used to hold the foreign key pointing to this model is the name of this model with the suffix +_id+ added. The +:foreign_key+ option lets you set the name of the foreign key directly:

<ruby>
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :friends, :class_name => "User",
    :foreign_key => "this_user_id",
    :association_foreign_key => "other_user_id"
end
</ruby>

1717
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-group). +:group+
1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726

The +:group+ option supplies an attribute name to group the result set by, using a +GROUP BY+ clause in the finder SQL.

<ruby>
class Parts < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies, :group => "factory"
end
</ruby>

1727
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-include). +:include+
1728

1729
You can use the +:include+ option to specify second-order associations that should be eager-loaded when this association is used.
1730

1731
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-insert_sql). +:insert_sql+
1732 1733 1734

Normally Rails automatically generates the proper SQL to create links between the associated classes. With the +:insert_sql+ option, you can specify a complete SQL statement to insert them yourself.

1735
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-join_table). +:join_table+
1736 1737 1738

If the default name of the join table, based on lexical ordering, is not what you want, you can use the +:join_table+ option to override the default.

1739
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-limit). +:limit+
1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745

The +:limit+ option lets you restrict the total number of objects that will be fetched through an association.

<ruby>
class Parts < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies, :order => "created_at DESC",
1746
    :limit => 50
1747 1748 1749
end
</ruby>

1750
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-offset). +:offset+
1751 1752 1753

The +:offset+ option lets you specify the starting offset for fetching objects via an association. For example, if you set +:offset => 11+, it will skip the first 11 records.

1754
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-order). +:order+
1755

1756
The +:order+ option dictates the order in which associated objects will be received (in the syntax used by an SQL +ORDER BY+ clause).
1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763

<ruby>
class Parts < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_and_belongs_to_many :assemblies, :order => "assembly_name ASC"
end
</ruby>

1764
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-readonly). +:readonly+
1765 1766 1767

If you set the +:readonly+ option to +true+, then the associated objects will be read-only when retrieved via the association.

1768
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-select). +:select+
1769 1770 1771

The +:select+ option lets you override the SQL +SELECT+ clause that is used to retrieve data about the associated objects. By default, Rails retrieves all columns.

1772
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-uniq). +:uniq+
1773 1774 1775

Specify the +:uniq => true+ option to remove duplicates from the collection.

1776
h6(#has_and_belongs_to_many-validate). +:validate+
1777 1778 1779

If you set the +:validate+ option to +false+, then associated objects will not be validated whenever you save this object. By default, this is +true+: associated objects will be validated when this object is saved.

1780
h5(#has_and_belongs_to_many-when_are_objects_saved). When are Objects Saved?
1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789

When you assign an object to a +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association, that object is automatically saved (in order to update the join table). If you assign multiple objects in one statement, then they are all saved.

If any of these saves fails due to validation errors, then the assignment statement returns +false+ and the assignment itself is cancelled.

If the parent object (the one declaring the +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association) is unsaved (that is, +new_record?+ returns +true+) then the child objects are not saved when they are added. All unsaved members of the association will automatically be saved when the parent is saved.

If you want to assign an object to a +has_and_belongs_to_many+ association without saving the object, use the <tt><em>collection</em>.build</tt> method.

1790
h4. Association Callbacks
1791

1792
Normal callbacks hook into the life cycle of Active Record objects, allowing you to work with those objects at various points. For example, you can use a +:before_save+ callback to cause something to happen just before an object is saved.
1793

1794
Association callbacks are similar to normal callbacks, but they are triggered by events in the life cycle of a collection. There are four available association callbacks:
1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833

* +before_add+
* +after_add+
* +before_remove+
* +after_remove+

You define association callbacks by adding options to the association declaration. For example:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders, :before_add => :check_credit_limit

  def check_credit_limit(order)
    ...
  end
end
</ruby>

Rails passes the object being added or removed to the callback.

You can stack callbacks on a single event by passing them as an array:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders,
    :before_add => [:check_credit_limit, :calculate_shipping_charges]

  def check_credit_limit(order)
    ...
  end

  def calculate_shipping_charges(order)
    ...
  end
end
</ruby>

If a +before_add+ callback throws an exception, the object does not get added to the collection. Similarly, if a +before_remove+ callback throws an exception, the object does not get removed from the collection.

1834
h4. Association Extensions
1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852

You're not limited to the functionality that Rails automatically builds into association proxy objects. You can also extend these objects through anonymous modules, adding new finders, creators, or other methods. For example:

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders do
    def find_by_order_prefix(order_number)
      find_by_region_id(order_number[0..2])
    end
  end
end
</ruby>

If you have an extension that should be shared by many associations, you can use a named extension module. For example:

<ruby>
module FindRecentExtension
  def find_recent
1853
    where("created_at > ?", 5.days.ago)
1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865
  end
end

class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders, :extend => FindRecentExtension
end

class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :deliveries, :extend => FindRecentExtension
end
</ruby>

1866
To include more than one extension module in a single association, specify an array of modules:
1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882

<ruby>
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :orders,
    :extend => [FindRecentExtension, FindActiveExtension]
end
</ruby>

Extensions can refer to the internals of the association proxy using these three accessors:

* +proxy_owner+ returns the object that the association is a part of.
* +proxy_reflection+ returns the reflection object that describes the association.
* +proxy_target+ returns the associated object for +belongs_to+ or +has_one+, or the collection of associated objects for +has_many+ or +has_and_belongs_to_many+.

h3. Changelog

1883
* April 7, 2010: Fixed document to validate XHTML 1.0 Strict. "Jaime Iniesta":http://jaimeiniesta.com
1884
* April 19, 2009: Added +:touch+ option to +belongs_to+ associations by "Mike Gunderloy":credits.html#mgunderloy
1885 1886 1887 1888
* February 1, 2009: Added +:autosave+ option "Mike Gunderloy":credits.html#mgunderloy
* September 28, 2008: Corrected +has_many :through+ diagram, added polymorphic diagram, some reorganization by "Mike Gunderloy":credits.html#mgunderloy . First release version.
* September 22, 2008: Added diagrams, misc. cleanup by "Mike Gunderloy":credits.html#mgunderloy (not yet approved for publication)
* September 14, 2008: initial version by "Mike Gunderloy":credits.html#mgunderloy (not yet approved for publication)