未验证 提交 2b201889 编写于 作者: Y Yang yaming 提交者: GitHub

Merge pull request #5542 from pkuyym/fix-5535

IndicateDataType --> GetKernelType
......@@ -45,9 +45,10 @@ class ChunkEvalOp : public framework::OperatorWithKernel {
}
protected:
framework::DataType IndicateDataType(
framework::OpKernelType GetKernelType(
const framework::ExecutionContext &ctx) const override {
return framework::DataType::FP32;
return framework::OpKernelType(framework::DataType::FP32,
ctx.device_context());
}
};
......@@ -82,12 +83,12 @@ class ChunkEvalOpMaker : public framework::OpProtoAndCheckerMaker {
"See below for details.")
.SetDefault(std::vector<int>{});
AddComment(R"DOC(
For some basics of chunking, please refer to
For some basics of chunking, please refer to
‘Chunking with Support Vector Mechines <https://aclanthology.info/pdf/N/N01/N01-1025.pdf>’.
CheckEvalOp computes the precision, recall, and F1-score of chunk detection,
and supports IOB, IOE, IOBES and IO (also known as plain) tagging schemes.
CheckEvalOp computes the precision, recall, and F1-score of chunk detection,
and supports IOB, IOE, IOBES and IO (also known as plain) tagging schemes.
Here is a NER example of labeling for these tagging schemes:
Li Ming works at Agricultural Bank of China in Beijing.
......@@ -96,17 +97,17 @@ Here is a NER example of labeling for these tagging schemes:
IOE: I-PER E-PER O O I-ORG I-ORG I-ORG E-ORG O E-LOC
IOBES: B-PER E-PER O O I-ORG I-ORG I-ORG E-ORG O S-LOC
There are three chunk types(named entity types) including PER(person), ORG(orgnazation)
There are three chunk types(named entity types) including PER(person), ORG(orgnazation)
and LOC(LOCATION), and we can see that the labels have the form <tag type>-<chunk type>.
Since the calculations actually use label ids rather than labels, extra attention
should be paid when mapping labels to ids to make CheckEvalOp work. The key point
is that the listed equations are satisfied by ids.
Since the calculations actually use label ids rather than labels, extra attention
should be paid when mapping labels to ids to make CheckEvalOp work. The key point
is that the listed equations are satisfied by ids.
tag_type = label % num_tag_type
chunk_type = label / num_tag_type
where `num_tag_type` is the num of tag types in the tagging scheme, `num_chunk_type`
where `num_tag_type` is the num of tag types in the tagging scheme, `num_chunk_type`
is the num of chunk types, and `tag_type` get its value from the following table.
Scheme Begin Inside End Single
......@@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ is the num of chunk types, and `tag_type` get its value from the following table
IOE - 0 1 -
IOBES 0 1 2 3
Still use NER as example, assuming the tagging scheme is IOB while chunk types are ORG,
Still use NER as example, assuming the tagging scheme is IOB while chunk types are ORG,
PER and LOC. To satisfy the above equations, the label map can be like this:
B-ORG 0
......@@ -126,9 +127,9 @@ PER and LOC. To satisfy the above equations, the label map can be like this:
I-LOC 5
O 6
It’s not hard to verify the equations noting that the num of chunk types
is 3 and the num of tag types in IOB scheme is 2. For example, the label
id of I-LOC is 5, the tag type id of I-LOC is 1, and the chunk type id of
It’s not hard to verify the equations noting that the num of chunk types
is 3 and the num of tag types in IOB scheme is 2. For example, the label
id of I-LOC is 5, the tag type id of I-LOC is 1, and the chunk type id of
I-LOC is 2, which consistent with the results from the equations.
)DOC");
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册