- 08 7月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
all sh boards use the same cpu linker script so move it to cpu/$(CPU) that could be overwrite in following order SOC BOARD via the corresponding config.mk tested on r2dplus Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: NNobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
-
currently we need to sync the linker script enty and TEXT_BASE manualy and the reloc_dst is based on it instead provide it now from the ldflags tested on r2dplus Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: NNobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
-
- 21 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trent Piepho 提交于
A recent gcc added a new unaligned rodata section called '.rodata.str1.1', which needs to be added the the linker script. Instead of just adding this one section, we use a wildcard ".rodata*" to get all rodata linker section gcc has now and might add in the future. However, '*(.rodata*)' by itself will result in sub-optimal section ordering. The sections will be sorted by object file, which causes extra padding between the unaligned rodata.str.1.1 of one object file and the aligned rodata of the next object file. This is easy to fix by using the SORT_BY_ALIGNMENT command. This patch has not be tested one most of the boards modified. Some boards have a linker script that looks something like this: *(.text) . = ALIGN(16); *(.rodata) *(.rodata.str1.4) *(.eh_frame) I change this to: *(.text) . = ALIGN(16); *(.eh_frame) *(SORT_BY_ALIGNMENT(SORT_BY_NAME(.rodata*))) This means the start of rodata will no longer be 16 bytes aligned. However, the boundary between text and rodata/eh_frame is still aligned to 16 bytes, which is what I think the real purpose of the ALIGN call is. Signed-off-by: NTrent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>
-
- 11 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wolfgang Denk 提交于
Signed-off-by: NWolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
-
- 28 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Jonas 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMark Jonas <mark.jonas@de.bosch.com> Signed-off-by: NNobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
-
- 15 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yoshihiro Shimoda 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYoshihiro Shimoda <shimoda.yoshihiro@renesas.com> CC: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org> Acked-by: NNobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
-
- 13 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wolfgang Denk 提交于
With recent toolchain versions, some boards would not build because or errors like this one (here for ocotea board when building with ELDK 4.2 beta): ppc_4xx-ld: section .bootpg [fffff000 -> fffff23b] overlaps section .bss [fffee900 -> fffff8ab] For many boards, the .bss section is big enough that it wraps around at the end of the address space (0xFFFFFFFF), so the problem will not be visible unless you use a 64 bit tool chain for development. On some boards however, changes to the code size (due to different optimizations) we bail out with section overlaps like above. The fix is to add the NOLOAD attribute to the .bss and .sbss sections, telling the linker that .bss does not consume any space in the image. Signed-off-by: NWolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
-
- 27 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wolfgang Denk 提交于
Signed-off-by: NWolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
-
- 13 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 提交于
This adds support for the Hitachi MS7750SE. Signed-off-by: NNobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
-