1. 14 5月, 2014 15 次提交
  2. 09 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 07 5月, 2014 4 次提交
  4. 06 5月, 2014 5 次提交
    • M
      serial: zynq: Fix typo in suffix function name · 870e0bda
      Michal Simek 提交于
      's/zynq_serial_initalize/zynq_serial_initialize/g'
      serial_initialize is used by all serial drivers.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
      870e0bda
    • M
      serial: zynq: Remove sparse warnings · 6c4da359
      Michal Simek 提交于
      Warnings:
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:181:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq0_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:181:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq0_setbrg' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:181:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq0_getc' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:181:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq0_tstc' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:181:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq0_putc' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:181:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq0_puts' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:182:22: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq_serial0_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:184:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq1_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:184:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq1_setbrg' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:184:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq1_getc' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:184:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq1_tstc' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:184:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq1_putc' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:184:1: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq1_puts' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/serial/serial_zynq.c:185:22: warning: symbol 'uart_zynq_serial1_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
      6c4da359
    • M
      net: zynq: Fix sparse warnings in gem · 2fd2489b
      Michal Simek 提交于
      Add missing header.
      
      Warnings:
      drivers/net/zynq_gem.c:491:5: warning: symbol 'zynq_gem_initialize' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/net/zynq_gem.c:542:5: warning: symbol 'zynq_gem_of_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
      2fd2489b
    • M
      net: zynq: Use predefined macros instead of hardcoded value · c1a9fa4b
      Michal Simek 提交于
      MII is used by this driver.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
      c1a9fa4b
    • S
      microblaze: Wire up OF support for emaclite · d1d37b5c
      Stephan Linz 提交于
       - expand the condition with CONFIG_OF_CONTROL
      Signed-off-by: NStephan Linz <linz@li-pro.net>
      Acked-by: NSimon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
      d1d37b5c
  5. 05 5月, 2014 10 次提交
  6. 02 5月, 2014 3 次提交
  7. 01 5月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      usb: gadget: allow ci_udc to build with new gadget framework · 2fc5dab2
      Stephen Warren 提交于
      Allow ci_udc.o to be built when using the new(?) USB gadget framework,
      as enabled by CONFIG_USB_GADGET.
      
      Note that this duplicates the Makefile entry for ci_udc.o, since it's
      also included inside #ifdef CONFIG_USB_ETHER. I'm not sure what that
      define means; perhaps an old style of Ethernet-specific USB gadget
      implementation?
      
      I wonder if the line that this patch adds shouldn't be outside all of
      the ifdefs, so it stands on its own, similar to how e.g. epautoconf.o
      is shared between the two?
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
      2fc5dab2
  8. 30 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      usb: ums: use only 1 buffer for CI_UDC · a022c1e1
      Stephen Warren 提交于
      ci_udc.c allocates only a single buffer for each endpoint, which
      ci_ep_alloc_request() returns as a hard-coded value rather than
      dynamically allocating. Consequently, storage_common.c must limit
      itself to using a single buffer at a time. Add a special case
      to the definition of FSG_NUM_BUFFERS for this.
      
      Another option would be to fix ci_ep_alloc_request() to dynamically
      allocate the buffers like some/all(?) other device mode drivers do.
      However, I don't think that ci_ep_queue() supports queueing up
      multiple buffers either yet, and I'm not familiar enough with the
      controller yet to implement that. As such, any attempt to use multiple
      buffers simply results in data corruption and other errors.
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
      a022c1e1