提交 de79ca95 编写于 作者: M Michal Simek

arm64: zynqmp: Add board_boot_order for MMC boot extension

In past SPL_ZYNQMP_TWO_SDHCI symbol was introduced to handle boards with
two sdhci controllers. The problem was that U-Boot is registering
controllers based on aliases in DT but bootmode targets specific controller
ID. That's why on boards with one "second" sdhci controller bootmode was
pointing to second controller(MMC2) but alias was setup to mmc0 (the first
controller). And SPL requires to point to mmc0 in this case.

Long time ago commit f101e4bd
("spl: add support for alternative boot device") added support for handling
multiple bootmodes in SPL. Use this functionality and setup second sdhci
controller as backup boot device.

Below is table with behavior:
HW/bootmode  bootorder
sd0/sd0      mmc0/mmc1 (mmc1 never called)
sd1/sd1      mmc1/mmc0 (mmc0 fails and mmc1 is called)
sd0+sd1/sd0  mmc0/mmc1 (mmc1 never called)
sd0+sd1/sd1  mmc1/mmc0 (mmc0 never called)

All other bootmodes are not affected but order can be extended to cover
advance boot flows.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
上级 594254e7
......@@ -117,17 +117,6 @@ config SPL_ZYNQMP_ALT_BOOTMODE_ENABLED
config ZYNQ_SDHCI_MAX_FREQ
default 200000000
config SPL_ZYNQMP_TWO_SDHCI
bool "Enable booting from both SDHCIs"
depends on SPL
help
This option reflects that board has two SDHCI controllers which
platform can use as boot device. This option ensures that SPL will
setup BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2 for SDHCI1 controller and BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1 for
SDHCI0 controller. Platforms which have only one SDHCI controller
shouldn't enable this option because it for software SDHCI0 or SDHCI1
are both covered by BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1.
config SPL_ZYNQMP_ALT_BOOTMODE
hex
default 0x0 if JTAG_MODE
......
......@@ -58,6 +58,16 @@ void spl_board_init(void)
}
#endif
void board_boot_order(u32 *spl_boot_list)
{
spl_boot_list[0] = spl_boot_device();
if (spl_boot_list[0] == BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1)
spl_boot_list[1] = BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2;
if (spl_boot_list[0] == BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2)
spl_boot_list[1] = BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
}
u32 spl_boot_device(void)
{
u32 reg = 0;
......@@ -81,11 +91,7 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT
case SD_MODE1:
case SD1_LSHFT_MODE: /* not working on silicon v1 */
/* if both controllers enabled, then these two are the second controller */
#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_ZYNQMP_TWO_SDHCI
return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2;
/* else, fall through, the one SDHCI controller that is enabled is number 1 */
#endif
case SD_MODE:
case EMMC_MODE:
return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
......
......@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_BASE=0xff000000
CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_CLOCK=100000000
CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_SPL_ZYNQMP_TWO_SDHCI=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
CONFIG_DISTRO_DEFAULTS=y
CONFIG_FIT=y
......
......@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ CONFIG_IDENT_STRING=" Xilinx ZynqMP SC for Versal"
CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_ZYNQMP_USB=y
CONFIG_SPL_ZYNQMP_TWO_SDHCI=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
CONFIG_AHCI=y
CONFIG_DISTRO_DEFAULTS=y
......
......@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ CONFIG_SPL=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_BASE=0xff000000
CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_CLOCK=100000000
CONFIG_ZYNQMP_USB=y
CONFIG_SPL_ZYNQMP_TWO_SDHCI=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
CONFIG_AHCI=y
CONFIG_DISTRO_DEFAULTS=y
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册