提交 b5992fac 编写于 作者: A Amit Virdi 提交者: Albert ARIBAUD

st_smi: Change timeout loop implementation

There are two problems in the current timeout loop implementation:
1. In case initial test failing, there will always be a delay of 1 ms
2. The delay duration is not tunable

The new implementation addresses both these limitations.
Signed-off-by: NAmit Virdi <amit.virdi@st.com>
Signed-off-by: NStefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
上级 cf9026de
......@@ -102,11 +102,15 @@ static struct flash_device flash_devices[] = {
*/
static int smi_wait_xfer_finish(int timeout)
{
do {
ulong start = get_timer(0);
while (get_timer(start) < timeout) {
if (readl(&smicntl->smi_sr) & TFF)
return 0;
udelay(1000);
} while (timeout--);
/* Try after 10 ms */
udelay(10);
};
return -1;
}
......@@ -219,16 +223,17 @@ static int smi_read_sr(int bank)
static int smi_wait_till_ready(int bank, int timeout)
{
int sr;
ulong start = get_timer(0);
/* One chip guarantees max 5 msec wait here after page writes,
but potentially three seconds (!) after page erase. */
do {
while (get_timer(start) < timeout) {
sr = smi_read_sr(bank);
if ((sr >= 0) && (!(sr & WIP_BIT)))
return 0;
/* Try again after 1m-sec */
udelay(1000);
/* Try again after 10 usec */
udelay(10);
} while (timeout--);
printf("SMI controller is still in wait, timeout=%d\n", timeout);
......@@ -245,6 +250,7 @@ static int smi_wait_till_ready(int bank, int timeout)
static int smi_write_enable(int bank)
{
u32 ctrlreg1;
u32 start;
int timeout = WMODE_TOUT;
int sr;
......@@ -263,14 +269,15 @@ static int smi_write_enable(int bank)
/* Restore the CTRL REG1 state */
writel(ctrlreg1, &smicntl->smi_cr1);
do {
start = get_timer(0);
while (get_timer(start) < timeout) {
sr = smi_read_sr(bank);
if ((sr >= 0) && (sr & (1 << (bank + WM_SHIFT))))
return 0;
/* Try again after 1m-sec */
udelay(1000);
} while (timeout--);
/* Try again after 10 usec */
udelay(10);
};
return -1;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册