- 15 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 14 5月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
thread-safe (where thread-safe counterparts are not available on all platforms), and don't memcpy to NULL-pointers Submitted by: Anonymous Reviewed by: Bodo Moeller Also, clean up htons vs. ntohs confusions.
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
those functions without having a parameter list declaration. (There are various similar cases left ...)
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 13 5月, 1999 5 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
While modifying the sources, I found some inconsistencies on the use of s->cert vs. s->session->sess_cert; I don't know if those could really have caused problems, but possibly this is a proper bug-fix and not just a clean-up.
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Richard Levitte <richard@levitte.org>
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Also I've subsituted real tabs for 8-spaces sequences in some lines so that things don't look that weird with a tab-width of 4.
-
- 11 5月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
that SSL_set_{accept,connect}_state be called before SSL_{accept,connect} may be used. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 10 5月, 1999 4 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
called sess_cert instead of just cert. This is in preparation of further changes: Probably often when s->session->sess_cert is used, we should use s->cert instead; s->session->sess_cert should be a new structure containing only the stuff that is for just one connection (e.g. the peer's certificate, which the SSL client implementations currently store in s->session->[sess_]cert, which is a very confusing thing to do). Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
pointers. The cert_st handling is changed by this in various ways. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 09 5月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
when restructuring the cert_st handling (removed unnused parts, and the like). Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Win32 version of rename() ). There isn't a precise rename() equivalent under Win95: the standard rename() complains if the destination already exists so replaced with a combination of unlink() and MoveFile().
-
- 06 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 04 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 02 5月, 1999 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 01 5月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
callbacks. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Anonymous Reviewed by: PR: Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 30 4月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
mutex.
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Anonymous
-
- 29 4月, 1999 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 27 4月, 1999 5 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 26 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 25 4月, 1999 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
a -write option is needed to actually change anything. Second attempt at getting rid of ERR, ERRC definitions: it might even work this time :-)
-
- 24 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR: Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-