- 20 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
This also avoids the problems with SC4.2 and unpatched SC5. Submitted by: Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
-
- 15 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 13 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Richard Levitte <richard@levitte.org>
-
- 23 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 20 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 18 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 16 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
when they cause the destination to expand. To see how evil this is try this: #include <pem.h> main() { BIGNUM *bn = NULL; int i; bn = BN_new(); BN_hex2bn(&bn, "FFFFFFFF"); BN_add_word(bn, 1); printf("Value %s\n", BN_bn2hex(bn)); } This would typically fail before the patch. It also screws up if you comment out the BN_hex2bn line above or in any situation where BN_add_word() causes the number of BN_ULONGs in the result to change (try doubling the number of FFs).
-
- 22 3月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 08 1月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 31 12月, 1998 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b 2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more 0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here .2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change). tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- 23 12月, 1998 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 22 12月, 1998 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 21 12月, 1998 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-