- 08 3月, 2016 40 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
We had the function EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cipher_data which is newly added for 1.1.0. As we now also need an EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_cipher_data it makes more sense for the former to be called EVP_CIPHER_CTX_get_cipher_data. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Ensure that a value of 0 is correctly handled for the split_send_frag argument. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
The new pipeline code added a new function EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_cipher_data(). Add documentation for this and the existing EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cipher_data() function. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
We used to use the wrec field in the record layer for keeping track of the current record that we are writing out. As part of the pipelining changes this has been moved to stack allocated variables to do the same thing, therefore the field is no longer needed. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Update a comment that was out of date due to the pipelining changes Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Document the new split_send_frag, max_pipelines and read_buf options. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
A previous commit added the SSL_has_pending() function which provides a method for knowing whether OpenSSL has buffered, but as yet unprocessed record data. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Add some documentation for all of the SSL/SSL_CTX functions/ctrls for conrolling read and write pipelining. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Fix an erroenous fall through when setting the max_pipelines value. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Previously s_client and s_server relied on using SSL_pending() which does not take into account read_ahead. For read pipelining to work, read_ahead gets set automatically. Therefore s_client and s_server have been converted to use SSL_has_pending() instead. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
This is similar to SSL_pending() but just returns a 1 if there is data pending in the internal OpenSSL buffers or 0 otherwise (as opposed to SSL_pending() which returns the number of bytes available). Unlike SSL_pending() this will work even if "read_ahead" is set (which is the case if you are using read pipelining, or if you are doing DTLS). A 1 return value means that we have unprocessed data. It does *not* necessarily indicate that there will be application data returned from a call to SSL_read(). The unprocessed data may not be application data or there could be errors when we attempt to parse the records. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
This capability is required for read pipelining. We will only read in as many records as will fit in the read buffer (and the network can provide in one go). The bigger the buffer the more records we can process in parallel. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
With read pipelining we use multiple SSL3_RECORD structures for reading. There are SSL_MAX_PIPELINES (32) of them defined (typically not all of these would be used). Each one has a 16k compression buffer allocated! This results in a significant amount of memory being consumed which, most of the time, is not needed. This change swaps the allocation of the compression buffer to be lazy so that it is only done immediately before it is actually used. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Read pipelining is controlled in a slightly different way than with write pipelining. While reading we are constrained by the number of records that the peer (and the network) can provide to us in one go. The more records we can get in one go the more opportunity we have to parallelise the processing. There are two parameters that affect this: * The number of pipelines that we are willing to process in one go. This is controlled by max_pipelines (as for write pipelining) * The size of our read buffer. A subsequent commit will provide an API for adjusting the size of the buffer. Another requirement for this to work is that "read_ahead" must be set. The read_ahead parameter will attempt to read as much data into our read buffer as the network can provide. Without this set, data is read into the read buffer on demand. Setting the max_pipelines parameter to a value greater than 1 will automatically also turn read_ahead on. Finally, the read pipelining as currently implemented will only parallelise the processing of application data records. This would only make a difference for renegotiation so is unlikely to have a significant impact. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Add dummy pipline support to dasync for the aes128_cbc_hmac_sha1 cipher. This is treated as an AEAD cipher. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Add the options min_send_frag and max_pipelines to s_server and s_client in order to control pipelining capabilities. This will only have an effect if a pipeline capable cipher is used (such as the one provided by the dasync engine). Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Use the new pipeline cipher capability to encrypt multiple records being written out all in one go. Two new SSL/SSL_CTX parameters can be used to control how this works: max_pipelines and split_send_fragment. max_pipelines defines the maximum number of pipelines that can ever be used in one go for a single connection. It must always be less than or equal to SSL_MAX_PIPELINES (currently defined to be 32). By default only one pipeline will be used (i.e. normal non-parallel operation). split_send_fragment defines how data is split up into pipelines. The number of pipelines used will be determined by the amount of data provided to the SSL_write call divided by split_send_fragment. For example if split_send_fragment is set to 2000 and max_pipelines is 4 then: SSL_write called with 0-2000 bytes == 1 pipeline used SSL_write called with 2001-4000 bytes == 2 pipelines used SSL_write called with 4001-6000 bytes == 3 pipelines used SSL_write_called with 6001+ bytes == 4 pipelines used split_send_fragment must always be less than or equal to max_send_fragment. By default it is set to be equal to max_send_fragment. This will mean that the same number of records will always be created as would have been created in the non-parallel case, although the data will be apportioned differently. In the parallel case data will be spread equally between the pipelines. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Implement aes128-cbc as a pipeline capable cipher in the dasync engine. As dasync is just a dummy engine, it actually just performs the parallel encrypts/decrypts in serial. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Add a flag to indicate that a cipher is capable of performing "pipelining", i.e. multiple encrypts/decrypts in parallel. Also add some new ctrls that ciphers will need to implement if they are pipeline capable. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Emilia Kasper 提交于
- Only build & test two configurations. Make all the other build variants buildonly on gcc (clang on osx). - Don't build with default clang at all on linux. - Only use gcc-5 and clang-3.6 for the sanitizer builds. Re-running e.g. CONFIG_OPTS="shared" with them seems redundant. Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Rich Salz 提交于
This reverts commit 963bb621. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Rich Salz 提交于
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
由 Rich Salz 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Strictly speaking, it isn't stdio and file access which offend me here; it's the fact that UEFI doesn't provide a strdup() function. But the fact that it's pointless without file access is a good enough excuse for compiling it out. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
This isn't a file access function; it's still present. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
UEFI needs this too. Don't keep it only in the Windows/DOS ifdef block. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Rich Salz 提交于
This replaces SHUTDOWN/SHUTDOWN2 with BIO_closesocket. Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Rob Percival 提交于
Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Rob Percival 提交于
Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Rob Percival 提交于
Avoids modifying certificate reference count, and thereby avoids locking. Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Rob Percival 提交于
Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Rob Percival 提交于
Without this, the peer certificate would never be deleted, resulting in a memory leak. Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Rob Percival 提交于
Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
It was unexpected that OpenSSL::Test::setup() should be called twice by the same recipe. However, that may happen if a recipe combines OpenSSL::Test and OpenSSL::Test::Simple, which can be a sensible thing to do. Therefore, we now allow it. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
-
由 Benjamin Kaduk 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
-