1. 28 6月, 2016 2 次提交
    • A
      unix-Makefile.tmpl: omit lib<rary>.a updates from directory targets. · dbbb6a87
      Andy Polyakov 提交于
      Since corresponding rule was removed from windows-makefile.tmpl out
      of necessity, question popped if it's appropriate to harmonize even
      unix-Makefile.tmpl. Note that as long as you work on single directory
      'make lib<rary>.a' is effectively equivalent to 'make <dir/ectory>'
      prior this modification.
      Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
      Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
      dbbb6a87
    • A
      windows-makefile.tmpl: don't use $? in library targets. · cfef7e9e
      Andy Polyakov 提交于
      Problem with Microsoft lib.exe is that it doesn't *update* modules
      in .lib archive, but creates new one upon every invocation. As result
      if a source file was updated and nmake was executed, a useless archive
      with only one module was created. In other words one has to always
      pass all .obj modules on command line, not only recently recompiled.
      
      [This also creates dilemma for directory targets, e.g. crypto\aes,
      that were added to simplify every-day life for developer. Since
      whole idea behind those targets is to minimize the re-compile time
      upon single file modification, the only sensible thing to do is to
      omit intended library update.]
      Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
      Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
      cfef7e9e
  2. 27 6月, 2016 10 次提交
  3. 26 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  4. 25 6月, 2016 10 次提交
  5. 24 6月, 2016 7 次提交
  6. 23 6月, 2016 8 次提交