- 03 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bernd Edlinger 提交于
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2835)
-
- 29 12月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
These tests depend on there being at least one protocol version below TLSv1.3 enabled. Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2144)
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2144)
-
- 10 11月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Send a TLS1.4 ClientHello with supported_versions and get TLS1.3 Send a TLS1.3 ClientHello without supported_versions and get TLS1.2 Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 16 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
On some platforms we can't startup the TLSProxy due to environmental problems (e.g. network set up on the build machine). These aren't OpenSSL problems so we shouldn't treat them as test failures. Just visibly indicate that we are skipping the test. We only skip the first time we attempt to start up the proxy. If that works then everything else should do...if not we should probably investigate and so report as a failure. This also removes test_networking...there is a danger that this turns into a test of user's environmental set up rather than OpenSSL. Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- 04 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
The TLSProxy based tests don't work when TLS is disabled so we shouldn't run them. Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- 22 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Salz 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- 03 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 22 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Misc fixes for no-sock Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- 17 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
In most builds, we can assume that engines live in the build tree subdirectory "engines". This was hard coded into the tests that use the engine ossltest. However, that hard coding is tedious, it would need to be done in every test recipe, and it's an incorrect assumption in some cases. This change has us play it safe and let the build files tell the testing framework where the engines are. Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
- 16 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
TLSProxy starts s_server and specifies the number of client connects it should expect. After that s_server is supposed to close down automatically. However, if another test is then run then TLSProxy will start a new instance of s_server. If the previous instance hasn't closed down yet then the new instance can fail to bind to the socket. Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- 09 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
There are issues binding listening ports. This may be analyzed more thoroughly later on. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 22 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
We were kinda sorta using a mix of $disabled{"static-engine" and $disabled{"dynamic-engine"} in Configure. Let's avoid confusion, choose one of them and stick to it. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 20 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
They depend on this feature because they use the engine ossltest, which is only available as a dynamic engine. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 13 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
If the environment variable HARNESS_ACTIVE isn't defined or HARNESS_VERBOSE is defined, it's probable that lots of output is desired. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 09 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
To be able to run tests when we've built in a directory other than the source tree, the testing framework needs a few adjustments. test/testlib/OpenSSL/Test.pm needs to know where it can find shlib_wrap.sh, and a number of other tests need to be told a different place to find engines than what they may be able to figure out on their own. Relying to $TOP is not enough, $SRCTOP and $BLDTOP can be used as an alternative. As part of this change, top_file and top_dir are removed and srctop_file, bldtop_file, srctop_dir and bldtop_dir take their place. Reviewed-by: NBen Laurie <ben@openssl.org>
-
- 26 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 17 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Make sure they detect that. Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
- 14 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
-
- 14 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- 07 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
This involves adding $TOP/util as perl library in test/run_tests.pl. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 12 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Two tests are added: one is a simple version tolerance test; the second is a test to ensure that OpenSSL operates correctly in the case of a zero length extensions block. The latter was broken inadvertently (now fixed) and it would have been helpful to have a test case for it. Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-