- 11 5月, 1999 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Anonymous
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 10 5月, 1999 10 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
used with negative char values, so I've added casts to unsigned char. Maybe what really should be done is change all those arrays and pointers to type unsigned char [] or unsigned char *, respectively; but using plain char with those predicates is just wrong, so something had to be done. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
so that warnings about unused variables (for certain -D... constellations) are avoided; this corresponds to the earlier change for SHA1. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
applies to usparc systems. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Winline'' with EGCS 1.1.2+
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Containts elements of code by Sebastian Akerman <sak@parallelconsulting.com> and made a bit less "naughty" by Steve.
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
called sess_cert instead of just cert. This is in preparation of further changes: Probably often when s->session->sess_cert is used, we should use s->cert instead; s->session->sess_cert should be a new structure containing only the stuff that is for just one connection (e.g. the peer's certificate, which the SSL client implementations currently store in s->session->[sess_]cert, which is a very confusing thing to do). Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
pointers. The cert_st handling is changed by this in various ways. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 09 5月, 1999 5 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
when restructuring the cert_st handling (removed unnused parts, and the like). Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
so that warnings about unused variables don't appear if those blocks are removed by the C preprocessor. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Win32 version of rename() ). There isn't a precise rename() equivalent under Win95: the standard rename() complains if the destination already exists so replaced with a combination of unlink() and MoveFile().
-
- 08 5月, 1999 10 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
file name for 'ca' to come from the environment.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
been changed so that it almost could be used under Windows. No one asked to keep it (and no one volunteered to bring it into useable state), so away with it. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 07 5月, 1999 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
(Rather than changing the files in places, we really should use .in files.) Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 06 5月, 1999 7 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Janez Jere <jj@void.si>
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Janez Jere <jj@void.si>
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Borland C submitted by: Janez Jere <jj@void.si>
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-