- 18 1月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 20 2月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
missed any. This compiles and runs on Linux, and external applications have no problems with it. The definite test will be to build this on VMS.
-
- 09 1月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
"doall" functions to using type-safe wrappers. As and where required, this can be replaced by redeclaring the underlying callbacks to use the underlying "void"-based prototypes (eg. if performance suffers from an extra level of function invocation).
-
- 02 12月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
casts) used in the lhash code are about as horrible and evil as they can be. For starters, the callback prototypes contain empty parameter lists. Yuck. This first change defines clearer prototypes - including "typedef"'d function pointer types to use as "hash" and "compare" callbacks, as well as the callbacks passed to the lh_doall and lh_doall_arg iteration functions. Now at least more explicit (and clear) casting is required in all of the dependant code - and that should be included in this commit. The next step will be to hunt down and obliterate some of the function pointer casting being used when it's not necessary - a particularly evil variant exists in the implementation of lh_doall.
-
- 19 10月, 2000 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
pointers at the end of the structure.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
by providing a function pointer that is given a name instead of a BIO. For example, this could be used to load configuration data from an LDAP server.
-
- 06 6月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
'p' more than once without an intervening sequence point. This behavior is undefined." What it essentially complains about is 'p=p+=1'. Now it's changed to 'p=p+1'...
-
- 02 6月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
like Malloc, Realloc and especially Free conflict with already existing names on some operating systems or other packages. That is reason enough to change the names of the OpenSSL memory allocation macros to something that has a better chance of being unique, like prepending them with OPENSSL_. This change includes all the name changes needed throughout all C files.
-
- 09 4月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
the result. I have retained the old behavior of the CONF_* functions, and have added a more "object oriented" interface through NCONF_* functions (New CONF, you see :-)), working the same way as, for example, the BIO interface. Really, the CONF_* are rewritten so they use the NCONF_* functions internally. In addition to that, I've split the old conf.c code into two files, conf_def.c and conf_api.c. conf_def.c contains the default config object that reads a configuration file the standard OpenSSL way, as well as configuration file with Win32 registry file syntax (I'm not sure I got that one right). conf_api.c provides an API to build other configuration file readers around (can you see a configuraion file in XML? I can :-)). Finally, I've changed the name conf_lcl.h to conf_def.h, since it's made specifically for that "class" and none others.
-
- 31 1月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
eliminate some of the -Wcast-qual warnings (debug-ben-strict target)
-
- 12 11月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
works on Unix and MS-DOS/Windows. It does not under VMS, so open it as text.
-
- 11 11月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Update docs, change 'ca' to use the new callback parameter. Now moved key_callback into app.c because some other utilities will use it soon.
-
- 21 6月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
seemed like a good idea at the time... several hours later it was rather obvious that these are used all over the place making the changes rather extensive.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
file from a bio or fp. Added some more constification to the BN library.
-
- 26 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 13 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Richard Levitte <richard@levitte.org>
-
- 27 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 24 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 20 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 18 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 22 3月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 31 12月, 1998 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b 2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more 0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here .2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change). tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- 23 12月, 1998 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 22 12月, 1998 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 21 12月, 1998 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-