- 07 7月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
In most scenarios the length of the input data is the hashsize, or 0 if the data is NULL. However with the new ticket_nonce changes the length can be different. Reviewed-by: NBen Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3852)
-
- 04 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3371)
-
- 25 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3243)
-
- 19 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
The internals test programs access header files that aren't guarded by the public __DECC_INCLUDE_PROLOGUE.H and __DECC_INCLUDE_EPILOGUE.H files, and therefore have no idea what the naming convention is. Therefore, we need to specify that explicitely in the internals test programs, since they aren't built with the same naming convention as the library they belong with. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3247)
-
- 29 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pauli 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3011)
-
- 20 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Birr-Pixton 提交于
These were still generated by openssl, but with the previous commit are corroborated by rustls. (cherry picked from commit eae1982619e90c6b79a6ebc89603d81c13c81ce8) Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2989)
-
- 16 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
These are self-generated test vectors which gives us very little confidence that we've got the implementation right. However until we can get vectors from somewhere else (or ideally official vectors) this is all we've got. At least it will tell us if we accidentally break something at some point in the future. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2895)
-
- 03 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2737)
-
- 02 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Cory Benfield 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2287)
-
- 30 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2259)
-
- 11 1月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2157)
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
A misreading of the TLS1.3 spec meant we were using the handshake hashes up to and including the Client Finished to calculate the client application traffic secret. We should be only use up until the Server Finished. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2157)
-
- 23 11月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
This is a major overhaul of the TLSv1.3 state machine. Currently it still looks like TLSv1.2. This commit changes things around so that it starts to look a bit less like TLSv1.2 and bit more like TLSv1.3. After this commit we have: ClientHello + key_share ----> ServerHello +key_share {CertificateRequest*} {Certificate*} {CertificateStatus*} <---- {Finished} {Certificate*} {CertificateVerify*} {Finished} ----> [ApplicationData] <---> [Application Data] Key differences between this intermediate position and the final TLSv1.3 position are: - No EncryptedExtensions message yet - No server side CertificateVerify message yet - CertificateStatus still exists as a separate message - A number of the messages are still in the TLSv1.2 format - Still running on the TLSv1.2 record layer Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 09 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-