- 19 1月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 18 1月, 2002 5 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 12 1月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 08 1月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Submitted by Pier Fumagalli <pier@betaversion.org>
-
- 05 1月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
undefined functions (memset, etc). - Put a .cvsignore in the aes directory too.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Experimental configuration code. Incomplete, largely untested and subject to change/deletion.
-
- 04 1月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: "Dan S. Camper" <dan@bti.net>
-
- 03 1月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
crypto/rijndael. Additionally, I applied the AES integration patch from Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> and fiddled it to work properly with the normal EVP constructs (and incidently work the same way as all other symmetric cipher implementations). This results in an API that looks a lot like the rest of the OpenSSL cipher suite.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 02 1月, 2002 4 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
to them.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Submitted by Leonard Janke <leonard@votehere.net>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
characters with the highest bit set as HIGHBIT. We need to expand this to support the UTF-8 character set properly. However, this solves the problem that the character 0x80 (which is common in UTF-8) gets masked to 0x00. Patch submitted by "Huang Yuzhen" <huangyuzhen@bj.tom.com>
-
- 21 12月, 2001 3 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 20 12月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 18 12月, 2001 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 14 12月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 12 12月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
<sram@broadcom.com> with the following comment: [...] We have implemented failover (ie, if for some reason that the hardware fails, the implementation detects this failure and performs this operation as if no hardware is present, ie, in software) for sometime now and have tested it here with our hardware. [...] This change was cc:ed to exports@crypto.com
-
- 11 12月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 10 12月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 07 12月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Don't overwrite signing time.
-
- 04 12月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
RFCs concerning X.500 directories use UID as a shorter name for the attribute type userId, which is defined by CCITT and available through RFCs 1274 and 2247. Unfortunately, if some applications have used the name "UID" for the uniqueIdentifier attribute type, they will produce incorrect results. However, I found it better to follow the standards that are out there rather than having our own incompatible one.
-
- 03 12月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Fix (?): Delete 'ip-pda 6' (id-pda-pseudonym) because it does not exist in RFC 3039. Also change Perl scripts to put auto-generation warning in the first lines of the file.
-
- 02 12月, 2001 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 24 11月, 2001 2 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
(in main branch, hn_ncipher.c is already correct)
-
- 22 11月, 2001 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
essentially overwrites itself with the new ENGINE, with the exception of reference counts, ex_data structures, and other 'admin' elements. However if the new ENGINE doesn't populate certain elements, there's the risk of the "dynamic" ENGINE's elements showing through - the "cmd_defns" were just one of the possibilities. This implements a more comprehensive cleanup.
-