- 12 7月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
defensive phrases...
-
- 11 7月, 2002 5 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Submitted by Götz Babin-Ebell <babinebell@trustcenter.de>
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
Submitted by: John.Airey@rnib.org.uk Reviewed by: PR: 128
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
Submitted by: Richard.Koenning@fujitsu-siemens.com Reviewed by: PR: 129
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
Submitted by: Garrett Anderson garrett@dirsec.com Reviewed by: PR: 120
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
Submitted by: jufi@nerdnet.de Reviewed by: PR: 138
-
- 10 7月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
des_old.h redefines crypt: #define crypt(b,s)\ DES_crypt((b),(s)) This scheme leads to failure, if header files with the OS's true definition of crypt() are processed _after_ des_old.h was processed. This is e.g. the case on HP-UX with unistd.h. As evp.h now again includes des.h (which includes des_old.h), this problem only came up after this modification. Solution: move header files (indirectly) including e_os.h before the header files (indirectly) including evp.h. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
not covered by the strength bit mask. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR: 130
-
- 09 7月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
(but noone uses it anyway) fix t1_enc.c: use OPENSSL_NO_RC4, not NO_RC4
-
- 08 7月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
Submitted by: Jan Tschirschwitz <Jan.Tschirschwitz@cluster-labs.de>
-
- 04 7月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 01 7月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
(noted by Jonathan Louie <jlouie@recourse.com>).
-
- 30 6月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 28 6月, 2002 7 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR 123
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR 71
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
This completes PR 123
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
handled properly. Part of PR 75
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Part of PR 75
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Part of PR 75
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Part of PR 75
-
- 27 6月, 2002 11 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
This concludes the changes from PR 123
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
This is due to weird Borland compilers. Part of PR 123
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Part of PR 123
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Part of PR 123
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 119
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 117
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
structure field names. PR: 112
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 106
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 105
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
was that they weren't really needed any more for EVP itself. However, it seems like soma applications (I know about OpenSSH, but there may be more) used evp.h as the 'load all' header file, which makes sense since we try our best to promote the use of EVP instead of the lower level crypto algorithms. Therefore, I put the inclusions back so the application authors don't get too shocked by all the errors they would otherwise get. Thanks to Theo de Raadt for making us aware of this.
-
- 26 6月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 25 6月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 21 6月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
pointers passed to them whenever necessary. Otherwise it is possible the caller may have overwritten (or deallocated) the original string data when a later ENGINE operation tries to use the stored values. Submitted by: Götz Babin-Ebell <babinebell@trustcenter.de> Reviewed by: Geoff Thorpe PR: 98
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
Submitted by: Bernhard Simon <bs@bsws.zid.tuwien.ac.at> Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
-