- 11 9月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 10 9月, 1999 7 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
because various programs are not updated that often and hence still expect header files names without the openssl/ prefix.
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 09 9月, 1999 5 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
OpenSSL is compiled with NO_RSA, no RSA operations can be used: including key generation storage and display of RSA keys. Since these operations are not covered by the RSA patent (my understanding is it only covers encrypt, decrypt, sign and verify) they can be included: this is an often requested feature, attempts to use the patented operations return an error code. This is enabled by setting RSA_NULL. This means that if a particular application has its own legal US RSA implementation then it can use that instead by setting it as the default RSA method. Still experimental and needs some fiddling of the other libraries so they have some options that don't attempt to use RSA if it isn't allowed.
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
on Solaris)
-
- 08 9月, 1999 4 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
It's still totally untested ...
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 07 9月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 06 9月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Lennart Bang
-
- 05 9月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
I've chosen to nest two functions in order to save about 4K. As a result s1-win32.asm doesn't look right (nested PROC/ENDP SEGMENT/ENDS) and it's probably impossible to compile. I assume I have to reconsider... But not today...
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
"Clean-up" stands for the fact that it's using common message digest template ../md32_common.h and sha[1_]dgst.c are reduced down to '#define SHA_[01]' and then '#include "sha_locl.h"'. It stands "(LP64)" there because it's 64 bit platforms which benefit most from the tune-up. The updated code exhibits 40% performance improvement on IRIX64 (sounds too good, huh? I probably should double check if it's not some cache trashing that was holding it back before), 28% - on Alpha Linux and 12% - Solaris 7/64.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 04 9月, 1999 5 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 03 9月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
portability. Submitted by: Lennart Bång
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 02 9月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 28 8月, 1999 5 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
went down from 1050 to 921 cycles on Pentium II. I haven't checked the figures on Pentium yet.
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
now and I'm putting it back to 'make test' later today.
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
- 27 8月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
on the command line for various utilities.
-
- 26 8月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-