1. 19 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  2. 02 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 25 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 13 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 09 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 08 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 29 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 20 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • R
      Build dynamic engines even if configured "no-shared" · 343ec2b0
      Richard Levitte 提交于
      Until now, the engines in engines/ were only built as dynamicaly
      loadable ones if shared libraries were built.
      
      We not dissociate the two and can build dynamicaly loadable engines
      even if we only build static libcrypto and libssl.  This is controlled
      with the option (enable|disable|no)-static-engine, defaulting to
      no-static-engine.
      
      Note that the engines in crypto/engine/ (dynamic and cryptodev) will
      always be built into libcrypto.
      Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
      343ec2b0
  9. 19 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • R
      Big rename fest of engine DSO names, from libFOO.so to FOO.so · 9ee0ed3d
      Richard Levitte 提交于
      The engine DSOs were named as if they were shared libraries, and could
      end up having all sorts of fancy names:
      
        Cygwin: cygFOO.dll
        Mingw:  FOOeay32.dll
        Unix:   libFOO.so / libFOO.sl / libFOO.dylib / ...
      
      This may be confusing, since they look like libraries one should link
      with at link time, when they're just DSOs.
      
      It's therefore time to rename them, and do it consistently on all
      platforms:
      
        Cygwin & Mingw: FOO.dll
        Unix:           FOO.{so,sl,dylib,...}
      
      Interestingly enough, the MSVC and VMS builds always did it this way.
      Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
      9ee0ed3d
  10. 14 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 10 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  12. 01 2月, 2016 1 次提交