- 21 1月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 25 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
- 27 12月, 2003 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Use BUF_strlcat() instead of strcat(). Use BIO_snprintf() instead of sprintf(). In some cases, keep better track of buffer lengths. This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>
-
- 02 8月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
with the definition.
-
- 25 10月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
libdes (which is still used out there) or other des implementations, the OpenSSL DES functions are renamed to begin with DES_ instead of des_. Compatibility routines are provided and declared by including openssl/des_old.h. Those declarations are the same as were in des.h when the OpenSSL project started, which is exactly how libdes looked at that time, and hopefully still looks today. The compatibility functions will be removed in some future release, at the latest in version 1.0.
-
- 31 7月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
DES's keyschedules. I know these two should be separate, and I'll back out the DES changes if they are deemed to be an error. Note that there is a memory leak lurking in SSL somewhere in this version.
-
- 29 3月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
des_encrypt() and des_encrypt() defined on some systems (Solaris and Unixware and maybe others), we rename des_encrypt() to des_encrypt1(). This should have very little impact on external software unless someone has written a mode of DES, since that's all des_encrypt() is meant for.
-
- 10 6月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 16 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
(meaning pointer to char) to des_cblock * (meaning pointer to array with 8 char elements), which allows the compiler to do more typechecking. (The changed argument types were of type des_cblock * back in SSLeay, and a lot of ugly casts were used then to turn them into pointers to elements; but it can be done without those casts.) Introduce new type const_des_cblock -- before, the pointers rather than the elements pointed to were declared const, and for some reason gcc did not complain about this (but some other compilers did).
-
- 15 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 13 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Richard Levitte <richard@levitte.org>
-
- 24 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 22 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 20 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 18 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 22 3月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 14 2月, 1999 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 31 12月, 1998 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b 2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more 0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here .2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change). tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- 23 12月, 1998 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 22 12月, 1998 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 21 12月, 1998 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-