- 05 1月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
Submitted by: Arne Ansper <arne@ats.cyber.ee>
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
Submitted by: Arne Ansper <arne@ats.cyber.ee>
-
- 04 1月, 1999 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
perl interpreter because not everyone has it in /usr/local/bin/perl.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 03 1月, 1999 10 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
in X509_STORE_new(), but document the fact that this variable is still unused in the certificate verification process.
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
perl interpreter because not everyone has it in /usr/local/bin/perl.
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
handling to x509.c
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
-
- 02 1月, 1999 9 次提交
-
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
Also document "sh config" as an easier alternative to "./Configure system".
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
rehashing the test certs
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
I wonder what eay.c is?
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
`openssl' and second, the shortcut symlinks for the `openssl <command>' are no longer created. This way we have a single and consistent command line interface `openssl <command>', similar to `cvs <command>'. Notice, the openssl.cnf, openssl.c and progs.pl files were changed after a repository copy, i.e. they still contain the complete file history.
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
zero unused bits.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 01 1月, 1999 10 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
perl5 was used.
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
(including if user presses ^C)
-
由 stephen 提交于
bug in the original but is otherwise just as horrible :-)
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 31 12月, 1998 6 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
And the first steps to descriptions in prosa.
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
is a pain to do, because of the various macro definitions which I had to expand manually to get their prototype :-( What's now needed is a volunteer who wants to write down one or two sentences per API function to document it a little bit...
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b 2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more 0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here .2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change). tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
由 stephen 提交于
-