[skip ci]
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2818)

Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2693)

CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2806)

With VMS C, the second parameter takes a 32-bit pointer.  When
building with 64-bit pointer size default, we must compensate.
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2811)

Use EVP_CIPHER_CTX_reset() instead
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2812)

- FLAT_INC
- PKCS1_CHECK (the SSL_OP_PKCS1_CHECK options have been
  no-oped)
- PKCS_TESTVECT (debugging leftovers)
- SSL_AD_MISSING_SRP_USERNAME (unfinished feature)
- DTLS_AD_MISSING_HANDSHAKE_MESSAGE (unfinished feature)
- USE_OBJ_MAC (note this removes a define from the public header but
   very unlikely someone would be depending on it)
- SSL_FORBID_ENULL
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NStephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

It's undocumented and unused in the tree.  The idea seems to have
never gained much traction, and can be removed without breaking
ABI compatibility.
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2800)

Cleanse instead, and free in the free routine.

Seems to have been introduced in commit
846ec07d when EVP_CIPHER_CTX was made
opaque.
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2798)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NStephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>

Base address setting was done for the sake of FIPS.  Since FIPS references
have been removed, we clean away this one as well.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2791)

Reviewed-by: NStephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2764)

AGL has a history of pointing out the idiosynchronies/laxness of the
openssl PEM parser in amusing ways.  If we want this functionality to
stay present, we should test that it works.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2756)

Generate a fresh certificate and DSA private key in their respective PEM
files.  Modify the resulting ASCII in various ways so as to produce input
files that might be generated by non-openssl programs (openssl always
generates "standard" PEM files, with base64 data in 64-character lines
except for a possible shorter last line).

Exercise various combinations of line lengths, leading/trailing
whitespace, non-base64 characters, comments, and padding, for both
unencrypted and encrypted files.  (We do not have any other test coverage
that uses encrypted files, as far as I can see, and the parser enforces
different rules for the body of encrypted files.)

Add a recipe to parse these test files and verify that they contain the
expected string or are rejected, according to the expected status.
Some of the current behavior is perhaps suboptimal and could be revisited.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2756)

Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2785)

Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2785)

Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2785)

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2793)

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2793)

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2793)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2787)

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

This is a bogus, undocumented format that was intended for testing; I
don't think anyone is using it.
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2790)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2788)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2788)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2789)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2774)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2774)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2774)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2774)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2784)

Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2778)

It is never built and the code is duplicated in bf_enc.c.
Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2778)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2755)

It is empty and is not compiled
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2777)

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2783)

There are a number of symbols in bn which are internal only and never used
by anything. They should be removed.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2766)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2781)

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2775)

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2775)