Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #2023

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #2023

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #2023

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #2023

This allows to free everything we allocated, so we can detect memory
leaks.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #2023

There was a time it could be NULL, but that was changed to always have it.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #2023

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #2023

New minimal fuzz corpora set
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

GH: #1910

Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

GH: #1828

CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1801)

Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

GH: #1788

New minimal fuzz corpora for asn1, asn1parse, bndiv, crl and x509
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

GH: #1678

Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

This is a new minimal corpus with the following changes:
- asn1: files: 1135 (+474), tuples: 27236 (+7496)
- asn1parse: files: 305 (-3), tuples: 8758 (+11)
- bignum: files: 370 (-1), tuples: 9547 (+10)
- bndiv: files: 160 (+0), tuples: 2416 (+6)
- cms: files: 155 (-1), tuples: 3408 (+0)
- conf: files: 231 (-11), tuples: 4668 (+3)
- crl: files: 905 (+188), tuples: 22876 (+4096)
- ct: files: 117 (+35), tuples: 3557 (+908)
- x509: files: 920, tuples: 28334

Note that tuple count depends on the binary and is random.
Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1324

Ensure that we don't build/run the ct fuzzing code if no-ct is used.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1331

The new fuzzing code broke no-cms
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

The i2d_SCT_LIST function is declared as __owur, therefore we need to check
the result or a --strict-warnings build will fail.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1323

Instead of having fuzz/build.info.fuzz magically and conditionally
included along with the other build.info files, incorporate it in
fuzz/build.info and add the conditions there instead.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

With no-deprecated, some nested includes don't happen by default.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Now that INCLUDE considers both the source and build trees, no need
for the rel2abs perl fragment hacks any more.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

GH: #1276

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Signed-off-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: NEmilia Kasper <emilia@openssl.org>

GH: #1255

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

GH: #1229

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

GH: #1229

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

MR: #2986

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

MR: #2949

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

GH: #1174

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NBen Laurie <ben@links.org>

MR: #2740