- 16 11月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
The previous commits put in place the logic to exchange key_share data. We now need to do something with that information. In <= TLSv1.2 the equivalent of the key_share extension is the ServerKeyExchange and ClientKeyExchange messages. With key_share those two messages are no longer necessary. The commit removes the SKE and CKE messages from the TLSv1.3 state machine. TLSv1.3 is completely different to TLSv1.2 in the messages that it sends and the transitions that are allowed. Therefore, rather than extend the existing <=TLS1.2 state transition functions, we create a whole new set for TLSv1.3. Intially these are still based on the TLSv1.2 ones, but over time they will be amended. The new TLSv1.3 transitions remove SKE and CKE completely. There's also some cleanup for some stuff which is not relevant to TLSv1.3 and is easy to remove, e.g. the DTLS support (we're not doing DTLSv1.3 yet) and NPN. I also disable EXTMS for TLSv1.3. Using it was causing some added complexity, so rather than fix it I removed it, since eventually it will not be needed anyway. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
At the moment the server doesn't yet do anything with this information. We still need to send the server's key_share info back to the client. That will happen in subsequent commits. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
In this commit we just generate the extension on the client side, but don't yet do anything with it. Subsequent commits, will add the server side capability. At the moment we hard code a single key_share. In the future we should make this configurable. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 14 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1669)
-
- 10 11月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
This is a skin deep change, which simply renames most places where we talk about curves in a TLS context to groups. This is because TLS1.3 has renamed the extension, and it can now include DH groups too. We still only support curves, but this rename should pave the way for a future extension for DH groups. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Added some TODOs, refactored a couple of things and added a SSL_IS_TLS13() macro. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 09 11月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
There were a few places where they could be declared const so this commit does that. Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
The name and type of the argument to ssl_check_for_safari() has changed. Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Based on review feedback received. Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 04 11月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 02 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Includes addition of the various options to s_server/s_client. Also adds one of the new TLS1.3 ciphersuites. This isn't "real" TLS1.3!! It's identical to TLS1.2 apart from the protocol and the ciphersuite...and the ciphersuite is just a renamed TLS1.2 one (not a "real" TLS1.3 ciphersuite). Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 18 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
- 03 10月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
ssl_set_handshake_header2() was only ever a temporary name while we had to have ssl_set_handshake_header() for code that hadn't been converted to WPACKET yet. No code remains that needed that so we can rename it. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Remove the old ssl_set_handshake_header() implementations. Later we will rename ssl_set_handshake_header2() to ssl_set_handshake_header(). Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
This is no longer needed now that all messages use WPACKET Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 29 9月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
This was a temporary function needed during the conversion to WPACKET. All callers have now been converted to the new way of doing this so this function is no longer required. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
The conversion to WPACKET broke the construction of the renegotiation extension. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 22 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
If a server sent multiple NPN extensions in a single ClientHello then a mem leak can occur. This will only happen where the client has requested NPN in the first place. It does not occur during renegotiation. Therefore the maximum that could be leaked in a single connection with a malicious server is 64k (the maximum size of the ServerHello extensions section). As this is client side, only occurs if NPN has been requested and does not occur during renegotiation this is unlikely to be exploitable. Issue reported by Shi Lei. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
A malicious client can send an excessively large OCSP Status Request extension. If that client continually requests renegotiation, sending a large OCSP Status Request extension each time, then there will be unbounded memory growth on the server. This will eventually lead to a Denial Of Service attack through memory exhaustion. Servers with a default configuration are vulnerable even if they do not support OCSP. Builds using the "no-ocsp" build time option are not affected. I have also checked other extensions to see if they suffer from a similar problem but I could not find any other issues. CVE-2016-6304 Issue reported by Shi Lei. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
All the other functions that take an argument for the number of bytes use convenience macros for this purpose. We should do the same with WPACKET_put_bytes(). Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 14 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
An OCSP_RESPID in a status request extension has 2 bytes for the length not 1. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Updated the construction code to use the new function. Also added some convenience macros for WPACKET_sub_memcpy(). Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-