- 31 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
PR: 1082
-
- 17 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
[most importantly] put back dependencies accidentaly eliminated in check-in #13342.
-
- 16 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
- 12 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 05 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
- 30 3月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 06 2月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
and GNU binutils, but kept BSD make... And I took the opportunity to unify other targets to this common least denominator...
-
- 20 12月, 2004 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
- 03 11月, 2004 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
if $(EXHEADER) is empty. Notified by many, solution suggested by Carson Gaspar <carson@taltos.org>
-
- 30 8月, 2004 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
"Proper" means "compiles and passes test." Versioning is broken (I think).
-
- 02 8月, 2004 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
COFF and a.out targets [similar to ELF targets]. You might notice some rudementary support for shared mingw builds under cygwin. It works (it produces cryptoeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll with everything exported by name), but it's primarily for testing/debugging purposes, at least for now...
-
- 24 7月, 2004 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
- 19 7月, 2004 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
I also used this opportunity to clean up some out-of-date targets and re-group targets by OS.
-
- 28 4月, 2004 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
especially for AIX. But most important BIGNUM assembler implementation submitted by IBM. Submitted by: Peter Waltenberg <pwalten@au1.ibm.com> Reviewed by: appro
-
- 20 4月, 2004 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
-
- 30 1月, 2004 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
- 29 1月, 2004 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 27 12月, 2003 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
This is part of a large change submitted by Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>
-
- 30 5月, 2003 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 04 1月, 2003 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
FreeBSD. Goal is to extend support even to SCO5, UnixWare/OpenUnix...
-
- 15 12月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
-
- 09 12月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 08 12月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
key-generation and prime-checking functions. Rather than explicitly passing callback functions and caller-defined context data for the callbacks, a new structure BN_GENCB is defined that encapsulates this; a pointer to the structure is passed to all such functions instead. This wrapper structure allows the encapsulation of "old" and "new" style callbacks - "new" callbacks return a boolean result on the understanding that returning FALSE should terminate keygen/primality processing. The BN_GENCB abstraction will allow future callback modifications without needing to break binary compatibility nor change the API function prototypes. The new API functions have been given names ending in "_ex" and the old functions are implemented as wrappers to the new ones. The OPENSSL_NO_DEPRECATED symbol has been introduced so that, if defined, declaration of the older functions will be skipped. NB: Some openssl-internal code will stick with the older callbacks for now, so appropriate "#undef" logic will be put in place - this is in case the user is *building* openssl (rather than *including* its headers) with this symbol defined. There is another change in the new _ex functions; the key-generation functions do not return key structures but operate on structures passed by the caller, the return value is a boolean. This will allow for a smoother transition to having key-generation as "virtual function" in the various ***_METHOD tables.
-
- 29 10月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
is something we really need to keep track of!). make update
-
- 28 10月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
- 09 10月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
give it. For 0.9.7 and up, that means util/domd needs to remove those double dashes from the argument list when gcc is used to find the dependencies.
-
- 02 8月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
the new method names where _GF... suffixes have been removed. Revert changes to ..._{get/set}_Jprojective_coordinates_...: The current implementation for ECC over binary fields does not use projective coordinates, and if it did, it would not use Jacobian projective coordinates; so it's OK to use the ..._GFp prefix for all this. Add author attributions to some files so that it doesn't look as if Sun wrote all of this :-)
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
The 'OPENSSL_NO_SUN_DIV' default is still subject to change, so I didn't bother to finish the CHANGES entry yet. Submitted by: Douglas Stebila <douglas.stebila@sun.com>, Sheueling Chang <sheueling.chang@sun.com> (CHANGES entry by Bodo Moeller)
-
- 28 6月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
handled properly. Part of PR 75
-
- 04 10月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 26 9月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
-
- 01 8月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 31 7月, 2001 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
HP-UX in common in ./config). Note that for the moment of this writing none of 64-bit platforms pass bntest. I'm committing this anyway as it's too frustrating to patch snapshots over and over while 0.9.6 is known to work.
-
- 11 3月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
multiplication of an arbitrary number of points.
-
- 09 3月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
errors can be tolerated, hide the error from 'make'. This gives shorter output both if ranlib fails and if it works.
-
- 22 2月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
and make all files the depend on it include it without prefixing it with openssl/. This means that all Makefiles will have $(TOP) as one of the include directories.
-
- 20 2月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
sure they are available in opensslconf.h, by giving them names starting with "OPENSSL_" to avoid conflicts with other packages and by making sure e_os2.h will cover all platform-specific cases together with opensslconf.h. I've checked fairly well that nothing breaks with this (apart from external software that will adapt if they have used something like NO_KRB5), but I can't guarantee it completely, so a review of this change would be a good thing.
-