Signed-off-by: NHJ <huangjun42@huawei.com>

Description:openssl 1.1.1d used bu libhapverify
Team:OTHERS
Feature or Bugfix:Feature
Binary Source:Yes, it is
PrivateCode(Yes/No):No

Change-Id: I8968f9c0f146b587da17a3e603bd04fb7b4c505b
Reviewed-on: http://mgit-tm.rnd.huawei.com/7842784Tested-by: Npublic jenkins <public_jenkins@notesmail.huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Nhouyuezhou 00386575 <hou@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Nlinyibin 00246405 <linyibin@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Nweiping 00548480 <ping.wei@huawei.com>

Around 138 distinct errors found and fixed; thanks!
Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3459)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

objects.pl only looked for a space to see if the name could be
used as a C identifier.  Improve the test to match the real C
rules.
Signed-off-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

could be done automagically, much like the numbering in libeay.num and
ssleay.num.  The solution works as follows:

  - New object identifiers are inserted in objects.txt, following the
    syntax given in objects.README.
  - objects.pl is used to process obj_mac.num and create a new
    obj_mac.h.
  - obj_dat.pl is used to create a new obj_dat.h, using the data in
    obj_mac.h.

This is currently kind of a hack, and the perl code in objects.pl
isn't very elegant, but it works as I intended.  The simplest way to
check that it worked correctly is to look in obj_dat.h and check the
array nid_objs and make sure the objects haven't moved around (this is
important!).  Additions are OK, as well as consistent name changes.