- 27 4月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
* "ex_data" - a CRYPTO_EX_DATA structure in the ENGINE structure itself that allows an ENGINE to store its own information there rather than in global variables. It follows the declarations and implementations used in RSA code, for better or worse. However there's a problem when storing state with ENGINEs because, unlike related structure types in OpenSSL, there is no ENGINE-vs-ENGINE_METHOD separation. Because of what ENGINE is, it has method pointers as its structure elements ... which leads to; * ENGINE_FLAGS_BY_ID_COPY - if an ENGINE should not be used just as a reference to an "implementation" (eg. to get to a hardware device), but should also be able to maintain state, then this flag can be set by the ENGINE implementation. The result is that any call to ENGINE_by_id() will not result in the existing ENGINE being returned (with its structural reference count incremented) but instead a new copy of the ENGINE will be returned that can maintain its own state independantly of any other copies returned in the past or future. Eg. key-generation might involve a series of ENGINE-specific control commands to set algorithms, sizes, module-keys, ids, ACLs, etc. A final command could generate the key. An ENGINE doing this would *have* to declare ENGINE_FLAGS_BY_ID_COPY so that the state of that process can be maintained "per-handle" and unaffected by other code having a reference to the same ENGINE structure.
-
- 26 4月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
here.
-
- 19 4月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
This change adds some new functionality to the ENGINE code and API to make it possible for ENGINEs to describe and implement their own control commands that can be interrogated and used by calling applications at run-time. The source code includes numerous comments explaining how it all works and some of the finer details. But basically, an ENGINE will normally declare an array of ENGINE_CMD_DEFN entries in its ENGINE - and the various new ENGINE_CTRL_*** command types take care of iterating through this list of definitions, converting command numbers to names, command names to numbers, getting descriptions, getting input flags, etc. These administrative commands are handled directly in the base ENGINE code rather than in each ENGINE's ctrl() handler, unless they specify the ENGINE_FLAGS_MANUAL_CMD_CTRL flag (ie. if they're doing something clever or dynamic with the command definitions). There is also a new function, ENGINE_cmd_is_executable(), that will determine if an ENGINE control command is of an "executable" type that can be used in another new function, ENGINE_ctrl_cmd_string(). If not, the control command is not supposed to be exposed out to user/config level access - eg. it could involve the exchange of binary data, returning results to calling code, etc etc. If the command is executable then ENGINE_ctrl_cmd_string() can be called using a name/arg string pair. The control command's input flags will be used to determine necessary conversions before the control command is called, and commands of this form will always return zero or one (failure or success, respectively). This is set up so that arbitrary applications can support control commands in a consistent way so that tweaking particular ENGINE behaviour is specific to the ENGINE and the host environment, and independant of the application or OpenSSL. Some code demonstrating this stuff in action will applied shortly to the various ENGINE implementations, as well as "openssl engine" support for executing arbitrary control commands before and/or after initialising various ENGINEs.
-
- 18 4月, 2001 3 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
ENGINE handler functions should take the ENGINE structure as a parameter - this is because ENGINE structures can be copied, and like other structure/method setups in OpenSSL, it should be possible for init(), finish(), ctrl(), etc to adjust state inside the ENGINE structures rather than globally. This commit includes the dependant changes in the ENGINE implementations.
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
Previous changes permanently removed the commented-out old code for where it was possible to create and use an ENGINE statically, and this code gets rid of the ENGINE_FLAGS_MALLOCED flag that supported the distinction with dynamically allocated ENGINEs. It also moves the area for ENGINE_FLAGS_*** values from engine_int.h to engine.h - because it should be possible to declare ENGINEs just from declarations in exported headers.
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
* Constify the get/set functions, and add some that functions were missing. * Add a new 'ENGINE_cpy()' function that will produce a new ENGINE based copied from an original (except for the references, ie. the new copy will be like an ENGINE returned from 'ENGINE_new()' - a structural reference). * Removed the "null parameter" checking in the get/set functions - it is legitimate to set NULL values as a way of *changing* an ENGINE (ie. removing a handler that previously existed). Also, passing a NULL pointer for an ENGINE is obviously wrong for these functions, so don't bother checking for it. The result is a number of error codes and strings could be removed.
-
- 20 2月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
sure they are available in opensslconf.h, by giving them names starting with "OPENSSL_" to avoid conflicts with other packages and by making sure e_os2.h will cover all platform-specific cases together with opensslconf.h. I've checked fairly well that nothing breaks with this (apart from external software that will adapt if they have used something like NO_KRB5), but I can't guarantee it completely, so a review of this change would be a good thing.
-
- 15 12月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
BCM5805 and BCM5820 units. So far I've merely taken a skim over the code and changed a few things from their original contributed source (de-shadowing variables, removing variables from the header, and re-constifying some functions to remove warnings). If this gives compilation problems on any system, please let me know. We will hopefully know for sure whether this actually functions on a system with the relevant hardware in a day or two. :-)
-
- 07 11月, 2000 3 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
few small constifying changes, and why not throw in a couple of extras while I'm at it?
-
- 03 11月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
load the "external" built-in engines (those that require DSO). This makes linking with libdl or other dso libraries non-mandatory. Change 'openssl engine' accordingly. Change the engine header files so some declarations (that differed at that!) aren't duplicated, and make sure engine_int.h includes engine.h. That way, there should be no way of missing the needed info.
-
- 27 10月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
At the same time, add VMS support for Rijndael.
-