Since return is inconsistent, I removed unnecessary parentheses and
unified them.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4541)

Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Make OBJ_name_cmp internal
Rename idea_xxx to IDEA_xxx
Rename get_rfc_xxx to BN_get_rfc_xxx
Rename v3_addr and v3_asid functions to X509v3_...
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>

Many options for supporting optimizations for legacy crypto on legacy
platforms have been removed.  This simplifies the source code and
does not really penalize anyone.
        DES_PTR (always on)
        DES_RISC1, DES_RISC2 (always off)
        DES_INT (always 'unsigned int')
        DES_UNROLL (always on)
        BF_PTR (always on) BF_PTR2 (removed)
        MD2_CHAR, MD2_LONG (always 'unsigned char')
        IDEA_SHORT, IDEA_LONG (always 'unsigned int')
        RC2_SHORT, RC2_LONG (always 'unsigned int')
        RC4_LONG (only int and char (for assembler) are supported)
        RC4_CHUNK (always long), RC_CHUNK_LL (removed)
        RC4_INDEX (always on)
And also make D_ENCRYPT macro more clear (@appro)

This is done in consultation with Andy.
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>

This was done by the following
        find . -name '*.[ch]' | /tmp/pl
where /tmp/pl is the following three-line script:
        print unless $. == 1 && m@/\* .*\.[ch] \*/@;
        close ARGV if eof; # Close file to reset $.

And then some hand-editing of other files.
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>

Especially since after the #ifdef cleanups this is not useful.
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>

Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:

1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b

2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because
   first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more
   0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of
   VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here
   .2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change).
tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------