- 16 11月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 14 11月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 338 Here's the description, submitted by Gisle Vanem <giva@bgnett.no>: 1. sock_init() renamed to ssl_sock_init() in ./apps/s_socket.c due to name-clash with Watt-32. 2. rand() renamed to Rand() in ./crypto/bn/divtest.c due to name-clash with <stdlib.h> 3. Added calls to dbug_init()/sock_init() in some demo programs. 4. Changed cflags/lflags in configure. Watt-32 install root now taken from $WATT_ROOT.
-
- 13 11月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 14 2月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 03 7月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
used.
-
- 02 7月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Contributed by "Brian Havard" <brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au>
-
- 22 2月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
defined there.
-
- 20 2月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
missed any. This compiles and runs on Linux, and external applications have no problems with it. The definite test will be to build this on VMS.
-
- 18 8月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
coverage for all syslog level.
-
- 04 8月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 03 8月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
where the openlog() is declared like this: extern int openlog __((char *_Ident, int _Logopt, int _Facility));
-
- 16 6月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
As far as I understand, it still needs to be compiled on NT... Contributed by Arne Ansper <arne@ats.cyber.ee>
-
- 02 6月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
like Malloc, Realloc and especially Free conflict with already existing names on some operating systems or other packages. That is reason enough to change the names of the OpenSSL memory allocation macros to something that has a better chance of being unique, like prepending them with OPENSSL_. This change includes all the name changes needed throughout all C files.
-
- 16 5月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 17 3月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 14 3月, 2000 4 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
lib$-functions and sys$-functions.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 11 3月, 2000 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
header...
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Curiously enough, void functions don't return a value.
-
- 02 3月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 21 2月, 2000 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
designed for that. This removes the potential error to mix data and function pointers. Please note that I'm a little unsure how incorrect calls to the old ctrl functions should be handled, in som cases. I currently return 0 and that's it, but it may be more correct to generate a genuine error in those cases.
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 24 1月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 28 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Pointed out by Nick Boyce <nick.boyce@eds.com>.
-
- 27 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 24 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 23 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Bernhard Simon <simon@zid.tuwien.ac.at>
-
- 20 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 18 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 09 3月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
around so more options appear in e_os.h
-
- 03 3月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
under Win32 (9X and NT) again. Note: some signed/unsigned changes recently checked in were killing the Win32 compile.
-
- 23 2月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-