Skip to content
体验新版
项目
组织
正在加载...
登录
切换导航
打开侧边栏
OpenHarmony
Third Party Openssl
提交
f47270e1
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
OpenHarmony
/
Third Party Openssl
1 年多 前同步成功
通知
10
Star
18
Fork
1
代码
文件
提交
分支
Tags
贡献者
分支图
Diff
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
Wiki
0
Wiki
分析
仓库
DevOps
项目成员
Pages
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
项目概览
详情
发布
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
分支图
比较
Issue
0
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
Pages
分析
分析
仓库分析
DevOps
Wiki
0
Wiki
成员
成员
收起侧边栏
关闭侧边栏
动态
分支图
创建新Issue
提交
Issue看板
提交
f47270e1
编写于
12月 06, 2017
作者:
M
Matt Caswell
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
电子邮件补丁
差异文件
Update CHANGES and NEWS for new release
Reviewed-by:
N
Rich Salz
<
rsalz@openssl.org
>
上级
97652f0b
变更
2
隐藏空白更改
内联
并排
Showing
2 changed file
with
26 addition
and
0 deletion
+26
-0
CHANGES
CHANGES
+22
-0
NEWS
NEWS
+4
-0
未找到文件。
CHANGES
浏览文件 @
f47270e1
...
...
@@ -190,6 +190,28 @@
issues, has been replaced to always returns NULL.
[Rich Salz]
Changes between 1.1.0g and 1.1.0h [xx XXX xxxx]
*) rsaz_1024_mul_avx2 overflow bug on x86_64
There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure
used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected.
Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this
defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely.
Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the
work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed
offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be
significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server
would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is
no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701.
This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions
like Intel Haswell (4th generation).
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by David Benjamin (Google). The issue
was originally found via the OSS-Fuzz project.
(CVE-2017-3738)
[Andy Polyakov]
Changes between 1.1.0f and 1.1.0g [2 Nov 2017]
...
...
NEWS
浏览文件 @
f47270e1
...
...
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
o Add a STORE module (OSSL_STORE)
o Claim the namespaces OSSL and OPENSSL, represented as symbol prefixes
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0g and OpenSSL 1.1.0h [under development]
o rsaz_1024_mul_avx2 overflow bug on x86_64 (CVE-2017-3738)
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0f and OpenSSL 1.1.0g [2 Nov 2017]
o bn_sqrx8x_internal carry bug on x86_64 (CVE-2017-3736)
...
...
编辑
预览
Markdown
is supported
0%
请重试
或
添加新附件
.
添加附件
取消
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
取消
想要评论请
注册
或
登录