提交 e7db9896 编写于 作者: A Andy Polyakov

bsaes-armv7.pl: closest shave. While 0.3 cpb improvement on S4 appears

insignificant, it's actually 4 cycles less for 14 instructions sequence!
上级 4f16215b
......@@ -18,11 +18,13 @@
# only low-level primitives and unsupported entry points, just enough
# to collect performance results, which for Cortex-A8 core are:
#
# encrypt 19.7 cycles per byte processed with 128-bit key
# decrypt 24.1 cycles per byte processed with 128-bit key
# key conv. 440 cycles per 128-bit key/0.17 of 8x block
# encrypt 19.5 cycles per byte processed with 128-bit key
# decrypt 24.0 cycles per byte processed with 128-bit key
# key conv. 440 cycles per 128-bit key/0.18 of 8x block
#
# Snapdragon S4 encrypts byte in 17.9 cycles and decrypts in 22.9.
# Snapdragon S4 encrypts byte in 17.6 cycles and decrypts in 22.6,
# which is [much] worse than anticipated (for further details see
# http://www.openssl.org/~appro/Snapdragon-S4.html).
#
# When comparing to x86_64 results keep in mind that NEON unit is
# [mostly] single-issue and thus can't [fully] benefit from
......@@ -282,35 +284,32 @@ $code.=<<___;
vand @s[2], @x[5], @x[1]
vorr @s[3], @x[4], @x[0]
veor @t[3], @t[3], @s[0]
veor @t[2], @t[2], @s[1]
veor @t[1], @t[1], @s[2]
veor @t[0], @t[0], @s[3]
veor @t[2], @t[2], @s[1]
@ Inv_GF16 \t0, \t1, \t2, \t3, \s0, \s1, \s2, \s3
@ new smaller inversion
veor @s[0], @t[3], @t[2]
vand @t[3], @t[3], @t[1]
vand @s[2], @t[3], @t[1]
vmov @s[0], @t[0]
veor @s[2], @t[0], @t[3]
veor @s[1], @t[2], @t[3]
veor @s[1], @t[2], @s[2]
veor @s[3], @t[0], @s[2]
veor @s[2], @t[0], @s[2] @ @s[2]=@s[3]
vand @s[3], @s[0], @s[2]
vbsl @s[1], @t[1], @t[0]
vbsl @s[3], @t[3], @t[2]
veor @t[3], @t[3], @t[2]
veor @s[3], @s[3], @t[2]
veor @t[2], @s[2], @s[1]
vand @t[2], @t[2], @t[0]
vbsl @s[0], @s[1], @s[2]
vbsl @t[0], @s[2], @s[1]
veor @s[2], @s[2], @t[2]
vand @s[2], @s[0], @s[3]
veor @t[1], @t[1], @t[0]
vand @s[2], @s[2], @s[3]
veor @s[2], @s[2], @s[0]
veor @s[2], @s[2], @t[3]
___
# output in s3, s2, s1, t1
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册