提交 d8311fc9 编写于 作者: M Matt Caswell

Add back support for SHA224 based sig algs

This used to work but was inadvertently removed as part of the TLSv1.3
work. This adds it back.

Fixes #3633
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3639)
上级 edef840f
......@@ -1857,6 +1857,7 @@ typedef enum downgrade_en {
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_secp256r1_sha256 0x0403
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_secp384r1_sha384 0x0503
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_secp521r1_sha512 0x0603
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_sha224 0x0303
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_sha1 0x0203
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pss_sha256 0x0804
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pss_sha384 0x0805
......@@ -1864,10 +1865,12 @@ typedef enum downgrade_en {
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha256 0x0401
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha384 0x0501
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha512 0x0601
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha224 0x0301
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha1 0x0201
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha256 0x0402
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha384 0x0502
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha512 0x0602
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha224 0x0302
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha1 0x0202
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_gostr34102012_256_gostr34112012_256 0xeeee
#define TLSEXT_SIGALG_gostr34102012_512_gostr34112012_512 0xefef
......
......@@ -686,10 +686,13 @@ static const uint16_t tls12_sigalgs[] = {
TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha512,
#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_EC
TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_sha224,
TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_sha1,
#endif
TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha224,
TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha1,
#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_DSA
TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha224,
TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha1,
TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha256,
......@@ -716,6 +719,9 @@ static const SIGALG_LOOKUP sigalg_lookup_tbl[] = {
{"ecdsa_secp521r1_sha512", TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_secp521r1_sha512,
NID_sha512, SSL_MD_SHA512_IDX, EVP_PKEY_EC, SSL_PKEY_ECC,
NID_ecdsa_with_SHA512, NID_secp521r1},
{NULL, TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_sha224,
NID_sha224, SSL_MD_SHA224_IDX, EVP_PKEY_EC, SSL_PKEY_ECC,
NID_ecdsa_with_SHA224, NID_undef},
{NULL, TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_sha1,
NID_sha1, SSL_MD_SHA1_IDX, EVP_PKEY_EC, SSL_PKEY_ECC,
NID_ecdsa_with_SHA1, NID_undef},
......@@ -738,6 +744,9 @@ static const SIGALG_LOOKUP sigalg_lookup_tbl[] = {
{"rsa_pkcs1_sha512", TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha512,
NID_sha512, SSL_MD_SHA512_IDX, EVP_PKEY_RSA, SSL_PKEY_RSA,
NID_sha512WithRSAEncryption, NID_undef},
{"rsa_pkcs1_sha224", TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha224,
NID_sha224, SSL_MD_SHA224_IDX, EVP_PKEY_RSA, SSL_PKEY_RSA,
NID_sha224WithRSAEncryption, NID_undef},
{"rsa_pkcs1_sha1", TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha1,
NID_sha1, SSL_MD_SHA1_IDX, EVP_PKEY_RSA, SSL_PKEY_RSA,
NID_sha1WithRSAEncryption, NID_undef},
......@@ -751,6 +760,9 @@ static const SIGALG_LOOKUP sigalg_lookup_tbl[] = {
{NULL, TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha512,
NID_sha512, SSL_MD_SHA512_IDX, EVP_PKEY_DSA, SSL_PKEY_DSA_SIGN,
NID_undef, NID_undef},
{NULL, TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha224,
NID_sha224, SSL_MD_SHA224_IDX, EVP_PKEY_DSA, SSL_PKEY_DSA_SIGN,
NID_undef, NID_undef},
{NULL, TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha1,
NID_sha1, SSL_MD_SHA1_IDX, EVP_PKEY_DSA, SSL_PKEY_DSA_SIGN,
NID_dsaWithSHA1, NID_undef},
......@@ -901,10 +913,11 @@ int tls12_check_peer_sigalg(SSL *s, uint16_t sig, EVP_PKEY *pkey)
}
lu = tls1_lookup_sigalg(sig);
/*
* Check sigalgs is known. Disallow SHA1 with TLS 1.3. Check key type is
* consistent with signature: RSA keys can be used for RSA-PSS
* Check sigalgs is known. Disallow SHA1/SHA224 with TLS 1.3. Check key type
* is consistent with signature: RSA keys can be used for RSA-PSS
*/
if (lu == NULL || (SSL_IS_TLS13(s) && lu->hash == NID_sha1)
if (lu == NULL
|| (SSL_IS_TLS13(s) && (lu->hash == NID_sha1 || lu->hash == NID_sha224))
|| (pkeyid != lu->sig
&& (lu->sig != EVP_PKEY_RSA_PSS || pkeyid != EVP_PKEY_RSA))) {
SSLerr(SSL_F_TLS12_CHECK_PEER_SIGALG, SSL_R_WRONG_SIGNATURE_TYPE);
......@@ -1489,10 +1502,12 @@ int tls12_copy_sigalgs(SSL *s, WPACKET *pkt,
return 0;
/*
* If TLS 1.3 must have at least one valid TLS 1.3 message
* signing algorithm: i.e. neither RSA nor SHA1
* signing algorithm: i.e. neither RSA nor SHA1/SHA224
*/
if (rv == 0 && (!SSL_IS_TLS13(s)
|| (lu->sig != EVP_PKEY_RSA && lu->hash != NID_sha1)))
|| (lu->sig != EVP_PKEY_RSA
&& lu->hash != NID_sha1
&& lu->hash != NID_sha224)))
rv = 1;
}
if (rv == 0)
......@@ -2279,8 +2294,10 @@ int tls_choose_sigalg(SSL *s, int *al)
for (i = 0; i < s->cert->shared_sigalgslen; i++) {
lu = s->cert->shared_sigalgs[i];
/* Skip SHA1, DSA and RSA if not PSS */
if (lu->hash == NID_sha1 || lu->sig == EVP_PKEY_DSA
/* Skip SHA1, SHA224, DSA and RSA if not PSS */
if (lu->hash == NID_sha1
|| lu->hash == NID_sha224
|| lu->sig == EVP_PKEY_DSA
|| lu->sig == EVP_PKEY_RSA)
continue;
if (ssl_md(lu->hash_idx) == NULL)
......
......@@ -533,6 +533,7 @@ static ssl_trace_tbl ssl_sigalg_tbl[] = {
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_secp256r1_sha256, "ecdsa_secp256r1_sha256"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_secp384r1_sha384, "ecdsa_secp384r1_sha384"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_secp521r1_sha512, "ecdsa_secp521r1_sha512"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_sha224, "ecdsa_sha224"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_ecdsa_sha1, "ecdsa_sha1"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pss_sha256, "rsa_pss_sha256"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pss_sha384, "rsa_pss_sha384"},
......@@ -540,10 +541,12 @@ static ssl_trace_tbl ssl_sigalg_tbl[] = {
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha256, "rsa_pkcs1_sha256"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha384, "rsa_pkcs1_sha384"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha512, "rsa_pkcs1_sha512"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha224, "rsa_pkcs1_sha224"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_rsa_pkcs1_sha1, "rsa_pkcs1_sha1"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha256, "dsa_sha256"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha384, "dsa_sha384"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha512, "dsa_sha512"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha224, "dsa_sha224"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_dsa_sha1, "dsa_sha1"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_gostr34102012_256_gostr34112012_256, "gost2012_256"},
{TLSEXT_SIGALG_gostr34102012_512_gostr34112012_512, "gost2012_512"},
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册