提交 9757a5ad 编写于 作者: D David Woodhouse 提交者: Tomas Mraz

Fix bogus check for EVP_PKEY mandatory digest in check_cert_usable()

In commit 6aca8d1a ("Honour mandatory digest on private key in
has_usable_cert()") I added two checks for the capabilities of the
EVP_PKEY being used. One of them was wrong, as it should only be
checking the signature of the X.509 cert (by its issuer) against the
sigalgs given in a TLS v1.3 signature_algorithms_cert extension.

Remove it.
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NBen Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9705)
上级 1bf29d49
......@@ -2563,27 +2563,23 @@ static int check_cert_usable(SSL *s, const SIGALG_LOOKUP *sig, X509 *x,
{
const SIGALG_LOOKUP *lu;
int mdnid, pknid, default_mdnid;
int mandatory_md = 0;
size_t i;
/* If the EVP_PKEY reports a mandatory digest, allow nothing else. */
ERR_set_mark();
switch (EVP_PKEY_get_default_digest_nid(pkey, &default_mdnid)) {
case 2:
mandatory_md = 1;
break;
case 1:
default: /* If it didn't report a mandatory NID, for whatever reasons,
* just clear the error and allow all hashes to be used. */
break;
}
if (EVP_PKEY_get_default_digest_nid(pkey, &default_mdnid) == 2 &&
sig->hash != default_mdnid)
return 0;
/* If it didn't report a mandatory NID, for whatever reasons,
* just clear the error and allow all hashes to be used. */
ERR_pop_to_mark();
if (s->s3->tmp.peer_cert_sigalgs != NULL) {
for (i = 0; i < s->s3->tmp.peer_cert_sigalgslen; i++) {
lu = tls1_lookup_sigalg(s->s3->tmp.peer_cert_sigalgs[i]);
if (lu == NULL
|| !X509_get_signature_info(x, &mdnid, &pknid, NULL, NULL)
|| (mandatory_md && mdnid != default_mdnid))
|| !X509_get_signature_info(x, &mdnid, &pknid, NULL, NULL))
continue;
/*
* TODO this does not differentiate between the
......@@ -2596,7 +2592,7 @@ static int check_cert_usable(SSL *s, const SIGALG_LOOKUP *sig, X509 *x,
}
return 0;
}
return !mandatory_md || sig->hash == default_mdnid;
return 1;
}
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册