Skip to content
体验新版
项目
组织
正在加载...
登录
切换导航
打开侧边栏
OpenHarmony
Third Party Openssl
提交
64790791
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
OpenHarmony
/
Third Party Openssl
大约 1 年 前同步成功
通知
9
Star
18
Fork
1
代码
文件
提交
分支
Tags
贡献者
分支图
Diff
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
Wiki
0
Wiki
分析
仓库
DevOps
项目成员
Pages
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
项目概览
详情
发布
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
分支图
比较
Issue
0
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
Pages
分析
分析
仓库分析
DevOps
Wiki
0
Wiki
成员
成员
收起侧边栏
关闭侧边栏
动态
分支图
创建新Issue
提交
Issue看板
提交
64790791
编写于
5月 03, 2005
作者:
A
Andy Polyakov
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
电子邮件补丁
差异文件
Commentary update.
上级
cee73df3
变更
1
隐藏空白更改
内联
并排
Showing
1 changed file
with
4 addition
and
2 deletion
+4
-2
crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl
crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl
+4
-2
未找到文件。
crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl
浏览文件 @
64790791
...
@@ -44,8 +44,10 @@
...
@@ -44,8 +44,10 @@
# improvement [I had to test it], while final Intel P4 performance
# improvement [I had to test it], while final Intel P4 performance
# achieves respectful 432MBps on 2.8GHz processor now. For reference.
# achieves respectful 432MBps on 2.8GHz processor now. For reference.
# If executed on Xeon, current RC4_CHAR code-path is 2.7x faster than
# If executed on Xeon, current RC4_CHAR code-path is 2.7x faster than
# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's is only 25%
# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's only 25%
# slower than the latter...
# slower slower than the RC4_INT one [meaning that if detecting CPU
# is not desired, then RC4_CHAR code-path should be preferred, as it
# provides better *all-round* performance].
$output
=
shift
;
$output
=
shift
;
open
STDOUT
,"
| $^X ../perlasm/x86_64-xlate.pl
$output
";
open
STDOUT
,"
| $^X ../perlasm/x86_64-xlate.pl
$output
";
...
...
编辑
预览
Markdown
is supported
0%
请重试
或
添加新附件
.
添加附件
取消
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
取消
想要评论请
注册
或
登录