Skip to content
体验新版
项目
组织
正在加载...
登录
切换导航
打开侧边栏
OpenHarmony
Third Party Openssl
提交
536454e5
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
OpenHarmony
/
Third Party Openssl
大约 1 年 前同步成功
通知
8
Star
18
Fork
1
代码
文件
提交
分支
Tags
贡献者
分支图
Diff
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
Wiki
0
Wiki
分析
仓库
DevOps
项目成员
Pages
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
项目概览
详情
发布
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
分支图
比较
Issue
0
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
Pages
分析
分析
仓库分析
DevOps
Wiki
0
Wiki
成员
成员
收起侧边栏
关闭侧边栏
动态
分支图
创建新Issue
提交
Issue看板
体验新版 GitCode,发现更多精彩内容 >>
提交
536454e5
编写于
1月 24, 2017
作者:
M
Matt Caswell
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
电子邮件补丁
差异文件
Update CHANGES and NEWS for new release
Reviewed-by:
N
Richard Levitte
<
levitte@openssl.org
>
上级
3f4bcf5b
变更
2
隐藏空白更改
内联
并排
Showing
2 changed file
with
54 addition
and
2 deletion
+54
-2
CHANGES
CHANGES
+44
-1
NEWS
NEWS
+10
-1
未找到文件。
CHANGES
浏览文件 @
536454e5
...
...
@@ -21,7 +21,50 @@
*) Support for SSL_OP_NO_ENCRYPT_THEN_MAC in SSL_CONF_cmd.
[Emilia Käsper]
Changes between 1.1.0b and 1.1.0c [xx XXX xxxx]
Changes between 1.1.0c and 1.1.0d [26 Jan 2017]
*) Truncated packet could crash via OOB read
If one side of an SSL/TLS path is running on a 32-bit host and a specific
cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that host to
perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash.
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by Robert Święcki of Google.
(CVE-2017-3731)
[Andy Polyakov]
*) Bad (EC)DHE parameters cause a client crash
If a malicious server supplies bad parameters for a DHE or ECDHE key
exchange then this can result in the client attempting to dereference a
NULL pointer leading to a client crash. This could be exploited in a Denial
of Service attack.
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by Guido Vranken.
(CVE-2017-3730)
[Matt Caswell]
*) BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64
There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring
procedure. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks
against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to
perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just
feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to
deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount
of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and
likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would
additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target
private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private
key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by
default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very
similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem.
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by the OSS-Fuzz project.
(CVE-2017-3732)
[Andy Polyakov]
Changes between 1.1.0b and 1.1.0c [10 Nov 2016]
*) ChaCha20/Poly1305 heap-buffer-overflow
...
...
NEWS
浏览文件 @
536454e5
...
...
@@ -9,11 +9,20 @@
o
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0a and OpenSSL 1.1.0b [26 Sep 2016]
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0c and OpenSSL 1.1.0d [26 Jan 2017]
o Truncated packet could crash via OOB read (CVE-2017-3731)
o Bad (EC)DHE parameters cause a client crash (CVE-2017-3730)
o BN_mod_exp may produce incorrect results on x86_64 (CVE-2017-3732)
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0b and OpenSSL 1.1.0c [10 Nov 2016]
o ChaCha20/Poly1305 heap-buffer-overflow (CVE-2016-7054)
o CMS Null dereference (CVE-2016-7053)
o Montgomery multiplication may produce incorrect results (CVE-2016-7055)
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0a and OpenSSL 1.1.0b [26 Sep 2016]
o Fix Use After Free for large message sizes (CVE-2016-6309)
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0 and OpenSSL 1.1.0a [22 Sep 2016]
...
...
编辑
预览
Markdown
is supported
0%
请重试
或
添加新附件
.
添加附件
取消
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
取消
想要评论请
注册
或
登录