提交 4b2603e4 编写于 作者: A Andy Polyakov

sparcv9cap.c: disengange Solaris-specific CPU detection routine in favour

of unified procedure relying on SIGILL.
PR: 2321
上级 bf48836c
......@@ -232,13 +232,23 @@ _sparcv9_rdtick:
.type _sparcv9_rdtick,#function
.size _sparcv9_rdtick,.-_sparcv9_rdtick
.global _sparcv9_vis1_probe
.align 8
_sparcv9_vis1_probe:
.word 0x81b00d80 !fxor %f0,%f0,%f0
add %sp,BIAS+2,%o1
retl
.word 0xc19a5a40 !ldda [%o1]ASI_FP16_P,%f0
.type _sparcv9_vis1_probe,#function
.size _sparcv9_vis1_probe,.-_sparcv9_vis1_probe
! Probe and instrument VIS1 instruction. Output is number of cycles it
! takes to execute rdtick and pair of VIS1 instructions. US-Tx VIS unit
! is slow (documented to be 6 cycles on T2) and the core is in-order
! single-issue, it should be possible to distinguish Tx reliably...
! Observed return values are:
!
! UltraSPARC IIi 7
! UltraSPARC IIe 7
! UltraSPARC III 7
! UltraSPARC T1 24
!
......@@ -247,9 +257,9 @@ _sparcv9_rdtick:
! It would be possible to detect specifically US-T1 by instrumenting
! fmul8ulx16, which is emulated on T1 and as such accounts for quite
! a lot of %tick-s, couple of thousand on Linux...
.global _sparcv9_vis1_probe
.global _sparcv9_vis1_instrument
.align 8
_sparcv9_vis1_probe:
_sparcv9_vis1_instrument:
.word 0x91410000 !rd %tick,%o0
.word 0x81b00d80 !fxor %f0,%f0,%f0
.word 0x85b08d82 !fxor %f2,%f2,%f2
......@@ -281,12 +291,28 @@ _sparcv9_vis1_probe:
.word 0x38680002 !bgu,a %xcc,.+8
mov %o3,%o0
! check for ASI_FP16_P is redundant...
add %sp,BIAS+2,%o1
retl
.word 0xc19a5a40 !ldda [%o1]ASI_FP16_P,%f0
.type _sparcv9_vis1_probe,#function
.size _sparcv9_vis1_probe,.-_sparcv9_vis1_probe
nop
.type _sparcv9_vis1_instrument,#function
.size _sparcv9_vis1_instrument,.-_sparcv9_vis1_instrument
.global _sparcv9_vis2_probe
.align 8
_sparcv9_vis2_probe:
retl
.word 0x81b00980 !bshuffle %f0,%f0,%f0
.type _sparcv9_vis2_probe,#function
.size _sparcv9_vis2_probe,.-_sparcv9_vis2_probe
.global _sparcv9_fmadd_probe
.align 8
_sparcv9_fmadd_probe:
.word 0x81b00d80 !fxor %f0,%f0,%f0
.word 0x85b08d82 !fxor %f2,%f2,%f2
retl
.word 0x81b80440 !fmaddd %f0,%f0,%f2,%f0
.type _sparcv9_fmadd_probe,#function
.size _sparcv9_fmadd_probe,.-_sparcv9_fmadd_probe
.global OPENSSL_cleanse
.align 32
......
......@@ -27,7 +27,10 @@ int bn_mul_mont(BN_ULONG *rp, const BN_ULONG *ap, const BN_ULONG *bp, const BN_U
}
unsigned long _sparcv9_rdtick(void);
unsigned long _sparcv9_vis1_probe(void);
void _sparcv9_vis1_probe(void);
unsigned long _sparcv9_vis1_instrument(void);
void _sparcv9_vis2_probe(void);
void _sparcv9_fmadd_probe(void);
unsigned long OPENSSL_rdtsc(void)
{
......@@ -41,8 +44,11 @@ unsigned long OPENSSL_rdtsc(void)
return _sparcv9_rdtick();
}
#if defined(__sun) && defined(__SVR4)
#if 0 && defined(__sun) && defined(__SVR4)
/* This code path is disabled, because of incompatibility of
* libdevinfo.so.1 and libmalloc.so.1 (see below for details)
*/
#include <malloc.h>
#include <dlfcn.h>
#include <libdevinfo.h>
#include <sys/systeminfo.h>
......@@ -114,7 +120,21 @@ void OPENSSL_cpuid_setup(void)
return;
}
}
#ifdef M_KEEP
/*
* Solaris libdevinfo.so.1 is effectively incomatible with
* libmalloc.so.1. Specifically, if application is linked with
* -lmalloc, it crashes upon startup with SIGSEGV in
* free(3LIBMALLOC) called by di_fini. Prior call to
* mallopt(M_KEEP,0) somehow helps... But not always...
*/
if ((h = dlopen(NULL,RTLD_LAZY)))
{
union { void *p; int (*f)(int,int); } sym;
if ((sym.p = dlsym(h,"mallopt"))) (*sym.f)(M_KEEP,0);
dlclose(h);
}
#endif
if ((h = dlopen("libdevinfo.so.1",RTLD_LAZY))) do
{
di_init_t di_init;
......@@ -150,6 +170,10 @@ void OPENSSL_cpuid_setup(void)
struct sigaction common_act,ill_oact,bus_oact;
sigset_t all_masked,oset;
int sig;
static int trigger=0;
if (trigger) return;
trigger=1;
if ((e=getenv("OPENSSL_sparcv9cap")))
{
......@@ -157,8 +181,8 @@ void OPENSSL_cpuid_setup(void)
return;
}
/* For now we assume that the rest supports UltraSPARC-I* only */
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P |= SPARCV9_PREFER_FPU|SPARCV9_VIS1;
/* Initial value, fits UltraSPARC-I&II... */
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P = SPARCV9_PREFER_FPU|SPARCV9_TICK_PRIVILEGED;
sigfillset(&all_masked);
sigdelset(&all_masked,SIGILL);
......@@ -176,34 +200,34 @@ void OPENSSL_cpuid_setup(void)
common_act.sa_mask = all_masked;
sigaction(SIGILL,&common_act,&ill_oact);
if (sigsetjmp(common_jmp,0) == 0)
sigaction(SIGBUS,&common_act,&bus_oact);/* T1 fails 16-bit ldda [on Linux] */
if (sigsetjmp(common_jmp,1) == 0)
{
_sparcv9_rdtick();
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P &= ~SPARCV9_TICK_PRIVILEGED;
}
else
{
/* This happens on US-I&II, which have working VIS1
* and fast FPU... In other words we are done... */
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P |= SPARCV9_TICK_PRIVILEGED;
sigaction(SIGILL,&ill_oact,NULL);
sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,&oset,NULL);
return;
}
sigaction(SIGILL,&ill_oact,NULL);
sigaction(SIGILL,&common_act,&ill_oact);
sigaction(SIGBUS,&common_act,&bus_oact);/* T1 fails 16-bit ldda */
if ((sig=sigsetjmp(common_jmp,0)) == 0)
if (sigsetjmp(common_jmp,1) == 0)
{
/* see sparccpud.S for details... */
if (_sparcv9_vis1_probe() >= 12)
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P &= ~SPARCV9_VIS1;
_sparcv9_vis1_probe();
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P |= SPARCV9_VIS1;
/* detect UltraSPARC-Tx, see sparccpud.S for details... */
if (_sparcv9_vis1_instrument() >= 12)
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P &= ~(SPARCV9_VIS1|SPARCV9_PREFER_FPU);
else
{
_sparcv9_vis2_probe();
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P |= SPARCV9_VIS2;
}
}
else
if (sigsetjmp(common_jmp,1) == 0)
{
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P &= ~SPARCV9_VIS1;
_sparcv9_fmadd_probe();
OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P |= SPARCV9_FMADD;
}
sigaction(SIGBUS,&bus_oact,NULL);
sigaction(SIGILL,&ill_oact,NULL);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册