提交 4113f54c 编写于 作者: H Hugo Landau 提交者: code4lala

CVE-2023-0286: Fix GENERAL_NAME_cmp for x400Address (3.0)

Reviewed-by: NPaul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Change-Id: If27a355635b2da681abac1d757386a5c9dfcdae3
Signed-off-by: Ncode4lala <fengziteng2@huawei.com>
上级 eb53f36c
......@@ -28,6 +28,24 @@ breaking changes, and mappings for the large list of deprecated functions.
[Migration guide]: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/tree/master/doc/man7/migration_guide.pod
* Fixed a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing
inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an `ASN1_STRING`
but subsequently interpreted by `GENERAL_NAME_cmp` as an `ASN1_TYPE`. This
vulnerability may allow an attacker who can provide a certificate chain and
CRL (neither of which need have a valid signature) to pass arbitrary pointers
to a `memcmp` call, creating a possible read primitive, subject to some
constraints. Refer to the advisory for more information. Thanks to David
Benjamin for discovering this issue. ([CVE-2023-0286])
This issue has been fixed by changing the public header file definition of
`GENERAL_NAME` so that `x400Address` reflects the implementation. It was not
possible for any existing application to successfully use the existing
definition; however, if any application references the `x400Address` field
(e.g. in dead code), note that the type of this field has changed. There is
no ABI change.
*Hugo Landau*
### Changes between 3.0.6 and 3.0.7 [1 Nov 2022]
* Fixed two buffer overflows in punycode decoding functions.
......@@ -19415,6 +19433,7 @@ ndif
<!-- Links -->
[CVE-2023-0286]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0286
[CVE-2022-2274]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2022-2274
[CVE-2022-2097]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2022-2274
[CVE-2020-1971]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2020-1971
......
......@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ int GENERAL_NAME_cmp(GENERAL_NAME *a, GENERAL_NAME *b)
return -1;
switch (a->type) {
case GEN_X400:
result = ASN1_TYPE_cmp(a->d.x400Address, b->d.x400Address);
result = ASN1_STRING_cmp(a->d.x400Address, b->d.x400Address);
break;
case GEN_EDIPARTY:
......
......@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ typedef struct GENERAL_NAME_st {
OTHERNAME *otherName; /* otherName */
ASN1_IA5STRING *rfc822Name;
ASN1_IA5STRING *dNSName;
ASN1_TYPE *x400Address;
ASN1_STRING *x400Address;
X509_NAME *directoryName;
EDIPARTYNAME *ediPartyName;
ASN1_IA5STRING *uniformResourceIdentifier;
......
......@@ -644,6 +644,14 @@ static struct gennamedata {
0xb7, 0x09, 0x02, 0x02
},
15
}, {
/*
* Regression test for CVE-2023-0286.
*/
{
0xa3, 0x00
},
2
}
};
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册