Skip to content
体验新版
项目
组织
正在加载...
登录
切换导航
打开侧边栏
OpenHarmony
Third Party Openssl
提交
39c136cc
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
OpenHarmony
/
Third Party Openssl
1 年多 前同步成功
通知
10
Star
18
Fork
1
代码
文件
提交
分支
Tags
贡献者
分支图
Diff
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
Wiki
0
Wiki
分析
仓库
DevOps
项目成员
Pages
T
Third Party Openssl
项目概览
项目概览
详情
发布
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
分支图
比较
Issue
0
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
Pages
分析
分析
仓库分析
DevOps
Wiki
0
Wiki
成员
成员
收起侧边栏
关闭侧边栏
动态
分支图
创建新Issue
提交
Issue看板
提交
39c136cc
编写于
9月 21, 2016
作者:
M
Matt Caswell
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
电子邮件补丁
差异文件
Updates CHANGES and NEWS for new release
Reviewed-by:
N
Richard Levitte
<
levitte@openssl.org
>
上级
41b42807
变更
2
隐藏空白更改
内联
并排
Showing
2 changed file
with
86 addition
and
2 deletion
+86
-2
CHANGES
CHANGES
+76
-1
NEWS
NEWS
+10
-1
未找到文件。
CHANGES
浏览文件 @
39c136cc
...
...
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
OpenSSL CHANGES
_______________
Changes between 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 [xx XXX xxxx]
Changes between 1.1.0
a
and 1.1.1 [xx XXX xxxx]
*)
...
...
@@ -11,6 +11,81 @@
https://www.akkadia.org/drepper/SHA-crypt.txt
[Richard Levitte]
Changes between 1.1.0 and 1.1.0a [22 Sep 2016]
*) OCSP Status Request extension unbounded memory growth
A malicious client can send an excessively large OCSP Status Request
extension. If that client continually requests renegotiation, sending a
large OCSP Status Request extension each time, then there will be unbounded
memory growth on the server. This will eventually lead to a Denial Of
Service attack through memory exhaustion. Servers with a default
configuration are vulnerable even if they do not support OCSP. Builds using
the "no-ocsp" build time option are not affected.
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.)
(CVE-2016-6304)
[Matt Caswell]
*) SSL_peek() hang on empty record
OpenSSL 1.1.0 SSL/TLS will hang during a call to SSL_peek() if the peer
sends an empty record. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a
Denial Of Service attack.
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by Alex Gaynor.
(CVE-2016-6305)
[Matt Caswell]
*) Excessive allocation of memory in tls_get_message_header() and
dtls1_preprocess_fragment()
A (D)TLS message includes 3 bytes for its length in the header for the
message. This would allow for messages up to 16Mb in length. Messages of
this length are excessive and OpenSSL includes a check to ensure that a
peer is sending reasonably sized messages in order to avoid too much memory
being consumed to service a connection. A flaw in the logic of version
1.1.0 means that memory for the message is allocated too early, prior to
the excessive message length check. Due to way memory is allocated in
OpenSSL this could mean an attacker could force up to 21Mb to be allocated
to service a connection. This could lead to a Denial of Service through
memory exhaustion. However, the excessive message length check still takes
place, and this would cause the connection to immediately fail. Assuming
that the application calls SSL_free() on the failed conneciton in a timely
manner then the 21Mb of allocated memory will then be immediately freed
again. Therefore the excessive memory allocation will be transitory in
nature. This then means that there is only a security impact if:
1) The application does not call SSL_free() in a timely manner in the event
that the connection fails
or
2) The application is working in a constrained environment where there is
very little free memory
or
3) The attacker initiates multiple connection attempts such that there are
multiple connections in a state where memory has been allocated for the
connection; SSL_free() has not yet been called; and there is insufficient
memory to service the multiple requests.
Except in the instance of (1) above any Denial Of Service is likely to be
transitory because as soon as the connection fails the memory is
subsequently freed again in the SSL_free() call. However there is an
increased risk during this period of application crashes due to the lack of
memory - which would then mean a more serious Denial of Service.
This issue was reported to OpenSSL by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.)
(CVE-2016-6307 and CVE-2016-6308)
[Matt Caswell]
*) solaris-x86-cc, i.e. 32-bit configuration with vendor compiler,
had to be removed. Primary reason is that vendor assembler can't
assemble our modules with -KPIC flag. As result it, assembly
support, was not even available as option. But its lack means
lack of side-channel resistant code, which is incompatible with
security by todays standards. Fortunately gcc is readily available
prepackaged option, which we firmly point at...
[Andy Polyakov]
Changes between 1.0.2h and 1.1.0 [25 Aug 2016]
*) Windows command-line tool supports UTF-8 opt-in option for arguments
...
...
NEWS
浏览文件 @
39c136cc
...
...
@@ -5,10 +5,19 @@
This file gives a brief overview of the major changes between each OpenSSL
release. For more details please read the CHANGES file.
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0 and OpenSSL 1.1.1 [under development]
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0
a
and OpenSSL 1.1.1 [under development]
o
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.0 and OpenSSL 1.1.0a [22 Sep 2016]
o OCSP Status Request extension unbounded memory growth (CVE-2016-6304)
o SSL_peek() hang on empty record (CVE-2016-6305)
o Excessive allocation of memory in tls_get_message_header()
(CVE-2016-6307)
o Excessive allocation of memory in dtls1_preprocess_fragment()
(CVE-2016-6308)
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.0.2h and OpenSSL 1.1.0 [25 Aug 2016]
o Copyright text was shrunk to a boilerplate that points to the license
...
...
编辑
预览
Markdown
is supported
0%
请重试
或
添加新附件
.
添加附件
取消
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
取消
想要评论请
注册
或
登录