提交 02cc82ff 编写于 作者: R Richard Levitte

I forgot there was a reason why the inclusions and definition of u_int

was made in a certain sequence.  This change restores the earlier
"chain of command".
上级 38f3b3e2
......@@ -62,13 +62,6 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include <signal.h>
#define USE_SOCKETS
#define NON_MAIN
#include "apps.h"
#undef USE_SOCKETS
#undef NON_MAIN
#include "s_apps.h"
#include <openssl/ssl.h>
#include <openssl/e_os2.h>
/* With IPv6, it looks like Digital has mixed up the proper order of
......@@ -80,6 +73,14 @@
typedef unsigned int u_int;
#endif
#define USE_SOCKETS
#define NON_MAIN
#include "apps.h"
#undef USE_SOCKETS
#undef NON_MAIN
#include "s_apps.h"
#include <openssl/ssl.h>
static struct hostent *GetHostByName(char *name);
#ifdef OPENSSL_SYS_WINDOWS
static void sock_cleanup(void);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册