- 04 6月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this change eliminates the internal __memalign function and makes the memalign and posix_memalign functions completely independent of the malloc implementation, written portably in terms of aligned_alloc.
-
- 13 9月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
libc.h was intended to be a header for access to global libc state and related interfaces, but ended up included all over the place because it was the way to get the weak_alias macro. most of the inclusions removed here are places where weak_alias was needed. a few were recently introduced for hidden. some go all the way back to when libc.h defined CANCELPT_BEGIN and _END, and all (wrongly implemented) cancellation points had to include it. remaining spurious users are mostly callers of the LOCK/UNLOCK macros and files that use the LFS64 macro to define the awful *64 aliases. in a few places, new inclusion of libc.h is added because several internal headers no longer implicitly include libc.h. declarations for __lockfile and __unlockfile are moved from libc.h to stdio_impl.h so that the latter does not need libc.h. putting them in libc.h made no sense at all, since the macros in stdio_impl.h are needed to use them correctly anyway.
-
- 20 4月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
commit 618b18c7 removed the previous detection and hardening since it was incorrect. commit 72141795 already handled all that remained for hardening the static-linked case. in the dynamic-linked case, have the dynamic linker check whether malloc was replaced and make that information available. with these changes, the properties documented in commit c9f415d7 are restored: if calloc is not provided, it will behave as malloc+memset, and any of the memalign-family functions not provided will fail with ENOMEM.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this change serves multiple purposes: 1. it ensures that static linking of memalign-family functions will pull in the system malloc implementation, thereby causing link errors if an attempt is made to link the system memalign functions with a replacement malloc (incomplete allocator replacement). 2. it eliminates calls to free that are unpaired with allocations, which are confusing when setting breakpoints or tracing execution. as a bonus, making __bin_chunk external may discourage aggressive and unnecessary inlining of it.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
the generated code should be mostly unchanged, except for explicit use of C_INUSE in place of copying the low bits from existing chunk headers/footers. these changes also remove mild UB due to dubious arithmetic on pointers into imaginary size_t[] arrays.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
commit c9f415d7 included checks to make calloc fallback to memset if used with a replaced malloc that didn't also replace calloc, and the memalign family fail if free has been replaced. however, the checks gave false positives for replacement whenever malloc or free resolved to a PLT entry in the main program. for now, disable the checks so as not to leave libc in a broken state. this means that the properties documented in the above commit are no longer satisfied; failure to replace calloc and the memalign family along with malloc is unsafe if they are ever called. the calloc checks were correct but useless for static linking. in both cases (simple or full malloc), calloc and malloc are in a source file together, so replacement of one but not the other would give linking errors. the memalign-family check was useful for static linking, but broken for dynamic as described above, and can be replaced with a better link-time check.
-
- 19 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
replacement is subject to conditions on the replacement functions. they may only call functions which are async-signal-safe, as specified either by POSIX or as an implementation-defined extension. if any allocator functions are replaced, at least malloc, realloc, and free must be provided. if calloc is not provided, it will behave as malloc+memset. any of the memalign-family functions not provided will fail with ENOMEM. in order to implement the above properties, calloc and __memalign check that they are using their own malloc or free, respectively. choice to check malloc or free is based on considerations of supporting __simple_malloc. in order to make this work, calloc is split into separate versions for __simple_malloc and full malloc; commit ba819787 already did most of the split anyway, and completing it saves an extra call frame. previously, use of -Bsymbolic-functions made dynamic interposition impossible. now, we are using an explicit dynamic-list, so add allocator functions to the list. most are not referenced anyway, but all are added for completeness.
-
- 24 7月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
the case where mem was already aligned is handled earlier in the function now.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this bug was caught by the new footer-corruption check in realloc and free. if the block returned by malloc was already aligned to the desired alignment, memalign's logic to split off the misaligned head was incorrect; rather than writing to a point inside the allocated block, it was overwriting the footer of the previous block on the heap with the value 1 (length 0 plus an in-use flag). fortunately, the impact of this bug was fairly low. (this is probably why it was not caught sooner.) due to the way the heap works, malloc will never return a block whose previous block is free. (doing so would be harmful because it would increase fragmentation with no benefit.) the footer is actually not needed for in-use blocks, except that its in-use bit needs to remain set so that it does not get merged with free blocks, so there was no harm in it being set to 1 instead of the correct value. however, there is one case where this bug could have had an impact: in multi-threaded programs, if another thread freed the previous block after memalign's call to malloc returned, but before memalign overwrote the previous block's footer, the resulting block in the free list could be left in a corrupt state. I have not analyzed the impact of this bad state and whether it could lead to more serious malfunction.
-
- 05 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
there are two motivations for this change. one is to avoid gratuitously depending on a C11 symbol for implementing a POSIX function. the other pertains to the documented semantics. C11 does not define any behavior for aligned_alloc when the length argument is not a multiple of the alignment argument. posix_memalign on the other hand places no requirements on the length argument. using __memalign as the implementation of both, rather than trying to implement one in terms of the other when their documented contracts differ, eliminates this confusion.
-
- 26 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
based on Gregor's patch sent to the list. includes: - stdalign.h - removing gets in C11 mode - adding aligned_alloc and adjusting other functions to use it - adding 'x' flag to fopen for exclusive mode
-
- 12 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-