- 13 11月, 2012 10 次提交
-
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
old code was correct only if the result was stored (without the excess precision) or musl was compiled with -ffloat-store. now we use STRICT_ASSIGN to work around the issue. (see note 160 in c11 section 6.8.6.4)
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
old code was correct only if the result was stored (without the excess precision) or musl was compiled with -ffloat-store. (see note 160 in n1570.pdf section 6.8.6.4)
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
old code (return x+x;) returns correct value and raises correct flags only if the result is stored as double (or float)
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
- 14 8月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this function never existed historically; since the float/double functions it's based on are nonstandard and deprecated, there's really no justification for its existence except that glibc has it. it can be added back if there's ever really a need...
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 09 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 nsz 提交于
exp(inf), exp(-inf), exp(nan) used to raise wrong flags
-
- 03 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 21 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 nsz 提交于
The long double adjustment was wrong: The usual check is mant_bits & 0x7ff == 0x400 before doing a mant_bits++ or mant_bits-- adjustment since this is the only case when rounding an inexact ld80 into double can go wrong. (only in nearest rounding mode) After such a check the ++ and -- is ok (the mantissa will end in 0x401 or 0x3ff). fma is a bit different (we need to add 3 numbers with correct rounding: hi_xy + lo_xy + z so we should survive two roundings at different places without precision loss) The adjustment in fma only checks for zero low bits mant_bits & 0x3ff == 0 this way the adjusted value is correct when rounded to double or *less* precision. (this is an important piece in the fma puzzle) Unfortunately in this case the -- is not a correct adjustment because mant_bits might underflow so further checks are needed and this was the source of the bug.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this is silly, but it makes apps that read binary junk and interpret it as ld80 "safer", and it gets gnulib to stop replacing printf...
-
- 03 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this was fixed previously on i386 but the corresponding code on x86_64 was missed.
-
- 08 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 nsz 提交于
backported fix from freebsd: http://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/base?view=revision&revision=233973
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 07 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 nsz 提交于
updated nextafter* to use FORCE_EVAL, it can be used in many other places in the math code to improve readability.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
apparently initializing a variable is not "using" it but assigning to it is "using" it. i don't really like this fix, but it's better than trying to make a bigger cleanup just before a release, and it should work fine (tested against nsz's math tests).
-
- 06 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 nsz 提交于
make nexttoward, nexttowardf independent of long double representation. fix nextafterl: it did not raise underflow flag when the result was 0.
-
- 05 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 nsz 提交于
old: 2*atan2(sqrt(1-x),sqrt(1+x)) new: atan2(fabs(sqrt((1-x)*(1+x))),x) improvements: * all edge cases are fixed (sign of zero in downward rounding) * a bit faster (here a single call is about 131ns vs 162ns) * a bit more precise (at most 1ulp error on 1M uniform random samples in [0,1), the old formula gave some 2ulp errors as well)
-
- 01 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 30 4月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this is a nonstandard function so it's not clear what conditions it should satisfy. my intent is that it be fast and exact for positive integral exponents when the result fits in the destination type, and fast and correctly rounded for small negative integral exponents. otherwise we aim for at most 1ulp error; it seems to differ from pow by at most 1ulp and it's often 2-5 times faster than pow.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
untested
-
- 04 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 nsz 提交于
use (1-x)*(1+x) instead of (1-x*x) in asin.s the later can be inaccurate with upward rounding when x is close to 1
-
- 29 3月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 nsz 提交于
-
由 nsz 提交于
the int part was wrong when -1 < x <= -0 (+0.0 instead of -0.0) and the size and performace gain of the asm version was negligible
-
由 nsz 提交于
cleaner implementation with unions and unsigned arithmetic
-
由 nsz 提交于
modfl(+-inf) was wrong on ld80 because the explicit msb was not taken into account during inf vs nan check
-
- 28 3月, 2012 4 次提交
- 23 3月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
special care is made to avoid any inexact computations when either arg is zero (in which case the exact absolute value of the other arg should be returned) and to support the special condition that hypot(±inf,nan) yields inf. hypotl is not yet implemented since avoiding overflow is nontrivial.
-
由 nsz 提交于
-