- 09 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
based on patch by Michael Forney. at the same time, I've changed the if branch to be more clear, avoiding the comma operator. the underlying issue is that Linux always returns ERANGE when size is too short, even when it's zero, rather than returning EINVAL for the special case of zero as required by POSIX.
-
- 08 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
the issue is described in commits 1e5eb735 and ffd8ac2d
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
this makes acosh slightly more precise around 1.0 on i386
-
- 07 10月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
sizeof had incorrect argument in a few places, the size was always large enough so the issue was not critical.
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
add missing va_end and remove some unnecessary code.
-
- 06 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
there is no reason to check the return value for setting errno, since brk never returns errors, only the new value of the brk (which may be the same as the old, or otherwise differ from the requested brk, on failure). it may be beneficial to eventually just eliminate this file and make the syscalls inline in malloc.c.
-
- 05 10月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
I wrongly assumed the brk syscall would set errno, but on failure it returns the old value of the brk rather than an error code.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
erfl had some superflous code left around after the last erf cleanup. the issue was reported by Alexander Monakov
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
the issue was reported by Alexander Monakov
-
- 04 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
the affected branch only applies for DSOs that lack standard hash table and only have the GNU hash table present.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 03 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
the va_arg call for the argv[]-terminating null pointer was missing, so this pointer was being wrongly used as the environment pointer. issue reported by Timo Teräs. proposed patch slightly modified to simplify the resulting code.
-
- 29 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
bug report and patch by Michael Forney. the terminating null pointer at the end of the gr_mem array was overwriting the beginning of the string data, causing the gr_name member to always be a zero-length string.
-
- 28 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
issue reported by Michael Forney: "If wn becomes 0 after processing a chunk of 4, mbsrtowcs currently continues on, wrapping wn around to -1, causing the rest of the string to be processed. This resulted in buffer overruns if there was only space in ws for wn wide characters." the original patch submitted added an additional check for !wn after the loop; to avoid extra branching, I instead just changed the wn>=4 check to wn>=5 to ensure that at least one slot remains after the word-at-a-time loop runs. this should not slow down the tail processing on real-world usage, since an extra slot that can't be processed in the word-at-a-time loop is needed for the null termination anyway.
-
- 20 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
if a multithreaded program became non-multithreaded (i.e. all other threads exited) while one thread held an internal lock, the remaining thread would fail to release the lock. the the program then became multithreaded again at a later time, any further attempts to obtain the lock would deadlock permanently. the underlying cause is that the value of libc.threads_minus_1 at unlock time might not match the value at lock time. one solution would be returning a flag to the caller indicating whether the lock was taken and needs to be unlocked, but there is a simpler solution: using the lock itself as such a flag. note that this flag is not needed anyway for correctness; if the lock is not held, the unlock code is harmless. however, the memory synchronization properties associated with a_store are costly on some archs, so it's best to avoid executing the unlock code when it is unnecessary.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this is the number of realtime signals available, not the maximum signal number or total number of signals.
-
- 17 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
they were leaving junk in the upper bits.
-
- 16 9月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this was resulting in crashes in posix_spawn on mips, and would have affected applications calling clone too. since the prototype for __clone has it as a variadic function, it may not assume that 16($sp) is writable for use in making the syscall. instead, it needs to allocate additional stack space, and then adjust the stack pointer back in both of the code paths for the parent process/thread.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
CLONE_PARENT is not necessary (CLONE_THREAD provides all the useful parts of it) and Linux treats CLONE_PARENT as an error in certain situations, without noticing that it would be a no-op due to CLONE_THREAD. this error case prevents, for example, use of a multi-threaded init process and certain usages with containers.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 15 9月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
PAGE_SIZE was hardcoded to 4096, which is historically what most systems use, but on several archs it is a kernel config parameter, user space can only know it at execution time from the aux vector. PAGE_SIZE and PAGESIZE are not defined on archs where page size is a runtime parameter, applications should use sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) to query it. Internally libc code defines PAGE_SIZE to libc.page_size, which is set to aux[AT_PAGESZ] in __init_libc and early in __dynlink as well. (Note that libc.page_size can be accessed without GOT, ie. before relocations are done) Some fpathconf settings are hardcoded to 4096, these should be actually queried from the filesystem using statfs.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
the value of MQ_PRIO_MAX does not fit, so it needs to use OFLOW.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
unlike other archs, the mips version of clone was not doing anything to align the stack pointer. this seems to have been the cause for some SIGBUS crashes that were observed in posix_spawn.
-
- 13 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
the underlying problem was not incorrect sign extension (fixed in the previous commit to this file by nsz) but that code that treats "long" as 32-bit was copied blindly from i386 to x86_64. now lrintl is identical to llrintl on x86_64, as it should be.
-
- 10 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
if fopen fails for a reason other than ENOENT, we must assume the intent is that the path file be used. failure may be due to misconfiguration or intentional resource-exhaustion attack (against suid programs), in which case falling back to loading libraries from an unintended path could be dangerous.
-
- 07 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
gcc did not always drop excess precision according to c99 at assignments before version 4.5 even if -std=c99 was requested which caused badly broken mathematical functions on i386 when FLT_EVAL_METHOD!=0 but STRICT_ASSIGN was not used consistently and it is worked around for old compilers with -ffloat-store so it is no longer needed the new convention is to get the compiler respect c99 semantics and when excess precision is not harmful use float_t or double_t or to specialize code using FLT_EVAL_METHOD
-
- 06 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
apparently gnulib requires invalid long double representations to be handled correctly in printf so we classify them according to how the fpu treats them: bad inf is nan, bad nan is nan, bad normal is nan and bad subnormal/zero is minimal normal
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
in atanh exception handling was left to the called log functions, but the argument to those functions could underflow or overflow. use double_t and float_t to avoid some useless stores on x86
-
- 05 9月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
libc.h is only for weak_alias so include it directly where it is used
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
acosh(x) is invalid for x<1, acoshf tried to be clever using signed comparisions to handle all x<2 the same way, but the formula was wrong on large negative values.
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
copy the fix from i386: return -1 instead of exp2l(x)-1 when x <= -65
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
there were two problems: * omitted underflow on subnormal results: exp2l(-16383.5) was calculated as sqrt(2)*2^-16384, the last bits of sqrt(2) are zero so the down scaling does not underflow eventhough the result is in subnormal range * spurious underflow for subnormal inputs: exp2l(0x1p-16400) was evaluated as f2xm1(x)+1 and f2xm1 raised underflow (because inexact subnormal result) the first issue is fixed by raising underflow manually if x is in (-32768,-16382] and not integer (x-0x1p63+0x1p63 != x) the second issue is fixed by treating x in (-0x1p64,0x1p64) specially for these fixes the special case handling was completely rewritten
-
由 Szabolcs Nagy 提交于
-