- 16 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 15 8月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
a valid mmapped block will have an even (actually aligned) "extra" field, whereas a freed chunk on the heap will always have an in-use neighbor. this fixes a potential bug if mmap ever allocated memory below the main program/brk (in which case it would be wrongly-detected as a double-free by the old code) and allows the double-free check to work for donated memory outside of the brk area (or, in the future, secondary heap zones if support for their creation is added).
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
no sense bloating apps with a function call for an equality comparison...
-
- 13 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
it previously was returning the pseudo-monotonic-realtime clock returned by times() rather than process cputime. it also violated C namespace by pulling in times(). we now use clock_gettime() if available because times() has ridiculously bad resolution. still provide a fallback for ancient kernels without clock_gettime.
-
- 12 8月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this is a "nonstandard" function that was "rejected" by POSIX, but nonetheless had its behavior documented in the POSIX rationale for fork. it's present on solaris and possibly some other systems, and duplicates the whole calling process, not just a single thread. glibc does not have this function. it should not be used in programs intending to be portable, but may be useful for testing, checkpointing, etc. and it's an interesting (and quite small) example of the usefulness of the __synccall framework originally written to work around deficiencies in linux's setuid syscall.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
fix up clone signature to match the actual behavior. the new __syncall_wait function allows a __synccall callback to wait for other threads to continue without returning, so that it can resume action after the caller finishes. this interface could be made significantly more general/powerful with minimal effort, but i'll wait to do that until it's actually useful for something.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
due to the barrier, it's safe just to block signals in the new thread, rather than blocking and unblocking in the parent thread.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
if a timer thread leaves signals unblocked, any future attempt by the main thread to prevent the process from being terminated by blocking signals will fail, since the signal can still be delivered to the timer thread.
-
- 08 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this works around pcc's lack of working support for weak references, and in principle is nice because it gets us back to the stage where the only weak symbol feature we use is weak aliases, nothing else. having fewer dependencies on fancy linker features is a good thing.
-
- 07 8月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
the new absolute-time-based wait kernelside was hard to get right and basically just code duplication. it could only improve "performance" when waiting, and even then, the improvement was just slight drop in cpu usage during a wait. actually, with vdso clock_gettime, the "old" way will be even faster than the "new" way if the time has already expired, since it will not invoke any syscalls. it can determine entirely in userspace that it needs to return ETIMEDOUT.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
normally we allow cancellation to be acted upon when a syscall fails with EINTR, since there is no useful status to report to the caller in this case, and the signal that caused the interruption was almost surely the cancellation request, anyway. however, unlike all other syscalls, close has actually performed its resource-deallocation function whenever it returns, even when it returned an error. if we allow cancellation at this point, the caller has no way of informing the program that the file descriptor was closed, and the program may later try to close the file descriptor again, possibly closing a different, newly-opened file. the workaround looks ugly (special-casing one syscall), but it's actually the case that close is the one and only syscall (at least among cancellation points) with this ugly property.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
if gcc decided to move this across a conditional that checks validity of the thread register, an invalid thread-register-based read could be performed and raise sigsegv.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 05 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
if saved, signal mask would not be restored unless some low signals were masked. if not saved, signal mask could be wrongly restored to uninitialized values. in any, wrong mask would be restored. i believe this function was written for a very old version of the jmp_buf structure which did not contain a final 0 field for compatibility with siglongjmp, and never updated...
-
- 04 8月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
cleanup push and pop are also no-ops if pthread_exit is not reachable. this can make a big difference for library code which needs to protect itself against cancellation, but which is unlikely to actually be used in programs with threads/cancellation.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
previously, pthread_cleanup_push/pop were pulling in all of pthread_create due to dependency on the __pthread_unwind_next function. this was not needed, as cancellation cleanup handlers can never be called unless pthread_exit or pthread_cancel is reachable.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 03 8月, 2011 9 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
like mutexes and semaphores, rwlocks suffered from a race condition where the unlock operation could access the lock memory after another thread successfully obtained the lock (and possibly destroyed or unmapped the object). this has been fixed in the same way it was fixed for other lock types. in addition, the previous implementation favored writers over readers. in the absence of other considerations, that is the best behavior for rwlocks, and posix explicitly allows it. however posix also requires read locks to be recursive. if writers are favored, any attempt to obtain a read lock while a writer is waiting for the lock will fail, causing "recursive" read locks to deadlock. this can be avoided by keeping track of which threads already hold read locks, but doing so requires unbounded memory usage, and there must be a fallback case that favors readers in case memory allocation failed. and all of this must be synchronized. the cost, complexity, and risk of errors in getting it right is too great, so we simply favor readers. tracking of the owner of write locks has been removed, as it was not useful for anything. it could allow deadlock detection, but it's not clear to me that returning EDEADLK (which a buggy program is likely to ignore) is better than deadlocking; at least the latter behavior prevents further data corruption. a correct program cannot invoke this situation anyway. the reader count and write lock state, as well as the "last minute" waiter flag have all been combined into a single atomic lock. this means all state transitions for the lock are atomic compare-and-swap operations. this makes establishing correctness much easier and may improve performance. finally, some code duplication has been cleaned up. more is called for, especially the standard __timedwait idiom repeated in all locks.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
it's unclear whether EINVAL or ENOSYS is used when the operation is not supported, so check for both...
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
futex returns EINVAL, not ENOSYS, when op is not supported. unfortunately this looks just like EINVAL from other causes, and we end up running the fallback code and getting EINVAL again. fortunately this case should be rare since correct code should not generate EINVAL anyway.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this dec used to be performed by the cancellation handler, which was called when popped.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
new features: - FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET op will be used for timed waits if available. this saves a call to clock_gettime. - error checking for the timespec struct is now inside __timedwait so it doesn't need to be duplicated everywhere. cond_timedwait still needs to duplicate it to avoid unlocking the mutex, though. - pushing and popping the cancellation handler is delegated to __timedwait, and cancellable/non-cancellable waits are unified.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this change is needed to fix a race condition and ensure that it's possible to unlock and destroy or unmap the mutex as soon as pthread_mutex_lock succeeds. POSIX explicitly gives such an example in the rationale and requires an implementation to allow such usage.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
sigaddset was not accepting SIGCANCEL as a valid signal number.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
the race condition these changes address is described in glibc bug report number 12674: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12674 up until now, musl has shared the bug, and i had not been able to figure out how to eliminate it. in short, the problem is that it's not valid for sem_post to inspect the waiters count after incrementing the semaphore value, because another thread may have already successfully returned from sem_wait, (rightly) deemed itself the only remaining user of the semaphore, and chosen to destroy and free it (or unmap the shared memory it's stored in). POSIX is not explicit in blessing this usage, but it gives a very explicit analogous example with mutexes (which, in musl and glibc, also suffer from the same race condition bug) in the rationale for pthread_mutex_destroy. the new semaphore implementation augments the waiter count with a redundant waiter indication in the semaphore value itself, representing the presence of "last minute" waiters that may have arrived after sem_post read the waiter count. this allows sem_post to read the waiter count prior to incrementing the semaphore value, rather than after incrementing it, so as to avoid accessing the semaphore memory whatsoever after the increment takes place. a similar, but much simpler, fix should be possible for mutexes and other locking primitives whose usage rules are stricter than semaphores.
-
- 01 8月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
i had missed the fact that a couple values were unassigned...
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
per POSIX and RFC 3493: If the specified address family is AF_INET, AF_INET6, or AF_UNSPEC, the service can be specified as a string specifying a decimal port number. 021 is a valid decimal number, therefore, interpreting it as octal seems to be non-conformant.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 31 7月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this is necessary to avoid build errors if feature test macros are not properly defined when including ucontext.h
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this race is fundamentally due to linux's bogus requirement that userspace, rather than kernelspace, fill in the siginfo structure. an intervening signal handler that calls fork could cause both the parent and child process to send signals claiming to be from the parent, which could in turn have harmful effects depending on what the recipient does with the signal. we simply block all signals for the interval between getuid and sigqueue syscalls (much like what raise() does already) to prevent the race and make the getuid/sigqueue pair atomic. this will be a non-issue if linux is fixed to validate the siginfo structure or fill it in from kernelspace.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
it's nicer for the function that doesn't use errno to be independent, and have the other one call it. saves some time and avoids clobbering errno.
-
- 30 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
setrlimit is supposed to be per-process, not per-thread, but again linux gets it wrong. work around this in userspace. not only is it needed for correctness; setxid also depends on the resource limits for all threads being the same to avoid situations where temporarily unlimiting the limit succeeds in some threads but fails in others.
-