- 14 4月, 2011 7 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
some of these definitions were just plain wrong, others based on outdated ancient "non-64" versions of the kernel interface. as much as possible has now been moved out of bits/* these changes break abi (the old abi for these functions was wrong), but since they were not working anyway it can hardly matter.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
it should be noted that flock does not mix well with standard fcntl locking, but nonetheless some applications will attempt to use flock instead of fcntl if both exist. options to configure or small patches may be needed. debian maintainers have plenty of experience with this unfortunate situation...
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
RLIM_* is in the reserved namespace for this header
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
trash in the upper 32 bits was making the kernel sleep forever in select on 64-bit systems.
-
- 13 4月, 2011 12 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
this eliminates the ugly static buffer in programs that use ptsname_r.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
after fork, we have a new process and the pid is equal to the tid of the new main thread. there is no need to make two separate syscalls to obtain the same number.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
we can do this without violating the namespace now that they are macros/inline functions rather than extern functions. the motivation is that gcc was generating giant, slow, horrible code for the old functions, and now generates a single byte-swapping instruction.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 12 4月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 11 4月, 2011 10 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
the basic idea is that the only things in alltypes.h should be types that either vary from system to system (in practice, not just in theoretical la-la land - this is the implementation so we choose what constraints we want to impose on ports) or which are needed by multiple system headers.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
1. saved errno was not being restored, illegally clearing errno to 0. 2. no need to backup and save errno around free; it will not touch except perhaps when the program has already invoked UB...
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
actually FLT_ROUNDS needs to expand to a static inline function that obtains the current rounding mode and returns it, but that will be added later with fenv.h stuff.
-
- 09 4月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
calling pthread_exit from, or pthread_cancel on, the timer callback thread will no longer destroy the timer.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
according to posix, readv "shall be equivalent to read(), except..." that it places the data into the buffers specified by the iov array. however on linux, when reading from a terminal, each iov element behaves almost like a separate read. this means that if the first iov exactly satisfied the request (e.g. a length-one read of '\n') and the second iov is nonzero length, the syscall will block again after getting the blank line from the terminal until another line is read. simply put, entering a single blank line becomes impossible. the solution, fortunately, is simple. whenever the buffer size is nonzero, reduce the length of the requested read by one byte and let the last byte go through the buffer. this way, readv will already be in the second (and last) iov, and won't re-block on the second iov.
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
- 08 4月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
POSIX clearly specifies the type of msg_iovlen and msg_controllen, and Linux ignores it and makes them both size_t instead. to work around this we add padding (instead of just using the wrong types like glibc does), but we also need to patch-up the struct before passing it to the kernel in case the caller did not zero-fill it. if i could trust the kernel to just ignore the upper 32 bits, this would not be necessary, but i don't think it will ignore them...
-
由 Rich Felker 提交于
-