提交 37bb3cce 编写于 作者: R Rich Felker

omit declaration of basename wrongly interpreted as prototype in C++

the non-prototype declaration of basename in string.h is an ugly
compromise to avoid breaking 2 types of broken software:

1. programs which assume basename is declared in string.h and thus
would suffer from dangerous pointer-truncation if an implicit
declaration were used.

2. programs which include string.h with _GNU_SOURCE defined but then
declare their own prototype for basename using the incorrect GNU
signature for the function (which would clash with a correct
prototype).

however, since C++ does not have non-prototype declarations and
interprets them as prototypes for a function with no arguments, we
must omit it when compiling C++ code. thankfully, all known broken
apps that suffer from the above issues are written in C, not C++.
上级 0e195dfa
......@@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ char *strcasestr(const char *, const char *);
char *strsep(char **, const char *);
void *memrchr(const void *, int, size_t);
void *mempcpy(void *, const void *, size_t);
#ifndef __cplusplus
char *basename();
#endif
#endif
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册