- 31 12月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Now default shaper is truly no-op.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No shaper has more than one behavior re this, so no need for a callback.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Not exhaustively tested, but I think I got the intended logic right. The logic can perhaps be simplified. Maybe we should disabled normalization with this shaper. Then again, for now focusing on correctness.
-
- 28 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
This reverts commit d5bd0590. The reasoning behind that logic was flawed and made under a misunderstanding of the original problem, and caused regressions as reported by Jonathan Kew in thread titled "tibetan marks" in Oct 2013. Apparently I have had fixed the original problem with this commit: 7e08f125 So, revert the faulty commit and everything seems to be in good shape.
-
- 19 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
- 20 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Mozilla Bug 873902 - Display Arabic text with diacritics is bad https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=873902
-
- 05 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
See thread "an issue regarding discrepancy between Korean and Unicode standards" on the mailing list for the rationale. In short: Uniscribe doesn't, so fonts are designed to work without it.
-
- 15 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 12 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Before, we were zeroing advance width of attached marks for non-Indic scripts, and not doing it for Indic. We have now three different behaviors, which seem to better reflect what Uniscribe is doing: - For Indic, no explicit zeroing happens whatsoever, which is the same as before, - For Myanmar, zero advance width of glyphs marked as marks *in GDEF*, and do that *before* applying GPOS. This seems to be what the new Win8 Myanmar shaper does, - For everything else, zero advance width of glyphs that are from General_Category=Mn Unicode characters, and do so before applying GPOS. This seems to be what Uniscribe does for Latin at least. With these changes, positioning of all tests matches for Myanmar, except for the glitch in Uniscribe not applying 'mark'. See preivous commit.
-
- 17 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
So we can handle Sinhala split matras smartly... Coming soon.
-
- 15 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 14 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Had to do some refactoring to make this happen... Under uniscribe bug compatibility mode, we still plit them Uniscrie-style, but Jonathan and I convinced ourselves that there is no harm doing this the Unicode way. This change makes that happen, and unbreaks free Sinhala fonts.
-
- 12 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
The merger of normalizer and glyph-mapping broke shapers that modified text stream. Unbreak them by adding a new preprocess_text shaping stage that happens before normalizing/cmap and disallow setup_mask modification of actual text.
-
- 02 8月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Hookup some Indic data to it. More to come.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 01 8月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
If there is no GPOS, zero mark advances. If there *is* GPOS and the shaper requests so, zero mark advances for attached marks. Fixes regression with Tibetan, where the font has GPOS, and marks a glyph as mark where it shouldn't get zero advance.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Enabled for all shapers except for Indic.
-
- 31 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Add a shaper class struct.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
When we removed the separate Hangul shaper, the specific normalization preference of Hangul was lost. Fix that. Also, the Thai shaper was copied from Hangul, so had the fully-composed normalization behavior, which was unnecessary. So, fix that too.
-
- 24 7月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Oops, thinko.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Uniscribe reorders U+0E3A to be after U+0E38 and U+0E39. We do that by modifying the ccc for U+0E3A. Fixes the two remaining Thai failures (see previous commit).
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Adjust the list of marks before SARA AM that get the reordering treatment. Also adjust cluster formation to match Uniscribe. With Wikipedia test data, now I see: - For Thai, with the Angsana New font from Win7, I see 54 failures out of over 4M tests (0.00129107%). Of the 54, two are legitimate reordering issues (fix coming soon), and the other 52 are simply Uniscribe using a zero-width space char instead of an unknown character for missing glyphs. No idea why. The missing-glyph sequences include one that is a Thai character followed by an Arabic Sokun. Someone confused it with Nikhahit I assume! - For Lao, with the Dokchampa font from Win7, 33 tests fail out of 54k (0.0615167%). All seem to be insignificant mark positioning with two marks on a base. Have to investigate.
-
- 19 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Fixes all Tibetan failures. All 180k of them! Merges back Hangul into the default shaper.
-
- 17 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
In a new callback... Currently unused by all complex shapers.
-
- 09 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 13 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 24 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 12 4月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
This is what old HB does. Morever, fixes rendering with Win8 malgun font. The Win7 version doesn't compose with either Uniscribe nor HB, but Win8 version works as expected, like Uniscribe, with this change. Lets call Hangul done for now.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
As reported by Jonathan Kew on the list.
-
- 11 4月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 10 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
That's not in the OpenType spec, but it's what MS and Adobe do.
-
- 08 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Previously, we were NOT actually recomposing Hangul Jamo. We do now. The two lines in: test/shaping/texts/in-tree/shaper-default/script-hangul/misc/misc.txt Now render the same with the UnDotum.ttf font. Previously the second linle was rendering boxes. We can also start applying OpenType Jamo features later. At this time, I have no idea how the 'ljmo', 'vjmo', 'tjmo' features are supposed to work. Maybe someone can explain them to me?
-
- 06 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
In preparation for Hangul shaper.
-