1. 23 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  2. 22 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 16 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 26 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 19 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • B
      [indic] Fix-up zero-context matching · 828e109c
      Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
      commit b5a0f69e
      Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
      Date:   Thu Oct 17 18:04:23 2013 +0200
      
          [indic] Pass zero-context=false to would_substitute for newer scripts
      
          For scripts without an old/new spec distinction, use zero-context=false.
          This changes behavior in Sinhala / Khmer, but doesn't seem to regress.
          This will be useful and used in Javanese.
      
      The *intention* was to change zero-context from true to false for scripts that
      don't have old-vs-new specs.  However, checking the code, looks like we
      essentially change zero-context to always be true; ie. we only changed things
      for old-spec, and we broke them.  That's what causes this bug:
      
        https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76705
      
      The root of the bug is here:
      
        /* Use zero-context would_substitute() matching for new-spec of the main
         * Indic scripts, but not for old-spec or scripts with one spec only. */
        bool zero_context = indic_plan->config->has_old_spec || !indic_plan->is_old_spec;
      
      Note that is_old_spec itself is:
      
        indic_plan->is_old_spec = indic_plan->config->has_old_spec && ((plan->map.chosen_script[0] & 0x000000FF) != '2');
      
      It's easy to show that zero_context is now always true.  What we really meant was:
      
        bool zero_context = indic_plan->config->has_old_spec && !indic_plan->is_old_spec;
      
      Ie, "&&" instead of "||".  We made this change supposedly to make Javanese
      work.  But apparently we got it working regardless!  So I'm going to fix this
      to only change the logic for old-spec and not touch other cases.
      828e109c
  6. 09 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 31 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 28 10月, 2013 2 次提交
    • B
      Revert "Zero marks by GDEF for Tibetan" · 71b4c999
      Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
      This reverts commit d5bd0590.
      
      The reasoning behind that logic was flawed and made under
      a misunderstanding of the original problem, and caused
      regressions as reported by Jonathan Kew in thread titled
      "tibetan marks" in Oct 2013.  Apparently I have had fixed
      the original problem with this commit:
      
        7e08f125
      
      So, revert the faulty commit and everything seems to be in good
      shape.
      71b4c999
    • B
      [indic] Adjust pref reordering logic · 46a863d9
      Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
      For Javanese (pref_len == 1) only reorder if it didn't ligate.  That's
      sensible, and what the spec says.  For other Indic (pref_len > 1)
      only reorder if ligated.
      
      Doesn't change any test numbers.
      46a863d9
  9. 19 10月, 2013 3 次提交
    • B
      [indic] Improve positioning of post-base bells and whistles · ddce2d8d
      Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
      Bug 58714 - Kannada u+0cb0 u+200d u+0ccd u+0c95 u+0cbe does not provide
      same results as Windows8
      https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58714
      
      Test with U+0CB0,U+200D,U+0CCD,U+0C95,U+0CBF and tunga.ttf.
      
      Improves some scripts.  Improves Bengali too, but numbers
      are up because we produce better results than Uniscribe for some
      sequences now.
      
      New numbers:
      BENGALI: 353724 out of 354188 tests passed. 464 failed (0.131004%)
      DEVANAGARI: 707307 out of 707394 tests passed. 87 failed (0.0122987%)
      GUJARATI: 366349 out of 366457 tests passed. 108 failed (0.0294714%)
      GURMUKHI: 60732 out of 60747 tests passed. 15 failed (0.0246926%)
      KANNADA: 951190 out of 951913 tests passed. 723 failed (0.0759523%)
      KHMER: 299070 out of 299124 tests passed. 54 failed (0.0180527%)
      MALAYALAM: 1048140 out of 1048334 tests passed. 194 failed (0.0185056%)
      ORIYA: 42320 out of 42329 tests passed. 9 failed (0.021262%)
      SINHALA: 271662 out of 271847 tests passed. 185 failed (0.068053%)
      TAMIL: 1091753 out of 1091754 tests passed. 1 failed (9.15957e-05%)
      TELUGU: 970555 out of 970573 tests passed. 18 failed (0.00185457%)
      ddce2d8d
    • B
    • B
      [indic] Add Javanese support! · c16012e9
      Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
      Seems to be working just fine!
      c16012e9
  10. 18 10月, 2013 9 次提交
  11. 17 10月, 2013 8 次提交
  12. 16 10月, 2013 8 次提交
  13. 15 10月, 2013 2 次提交
    • B
      [indic] Handle Avagraha · 3c7b3641
      Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
      It can come either at the end(ish!) of the syllable, or independently.
      When independent, it accepts a few bits and pieces.
      3c7b3641
    • B
      [indic] Some scripts like blwf applied to pre-base characters · 8acbb6be
      Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
      ...while some don't!
      
      Improved Bengali, Devanagari, Gurmukhi, Malayalam.
      
      Updated numbers:
      
      BENGALI: 353732 out of 354188 tests passed. 456 failed (0.128745%)
      DEVANAGARI: 707307 out of 707394 tests passed. 87 failed (0.0122987%)
      GUJARATI: 366349 out of 366457 tests passed. 108 failed (0.0294714%)
      GURMUKHI: 60732 out of 60747 tests passed. 15 failed (0.0246926%)
      KANNADA: 951030 out of 951913 tests passed. 883 failed (0.0927606%)
      KHMER: 299070 out of 299124 tests passed. 54 failed (0.0180527%)
      MALAYALAM: 1048134 out of 1048334 tests passed. 200 failed (0.0190779%)
      ORIYA: 42320 out of 42329 tests passed. 9 failed (0.021262%)
      SINHALA: 271666 out of 271847 tests passed. 181 failed (0.0665816%)
      TAMIL: 1091753 out of 1091754 tests passed. 1 failed (9.15957e-05%)
      TELUGU: 970555 out of 970573 tests passed. 18 failed (0.00185457%)
      8acbb6be