- 13 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 03 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
User can define hb_malloc_impl, etc, to name of custom allocator functions that have the same signature as malloc.
-
- 29 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Not functional change (expected!).
-
- 01 9月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Needed for upcoming merge-clusters fix.
-
- 21 7月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Unused right now.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
And add check to FLAG()
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 11 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
- 15 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
This reverts commit 89cbd4d9. See discussion: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747772
-
- 14 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Not sure we have any right now; motivated by this: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747772
-
- 10 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Konstantin Ritt 提交于
Based on patch from Björn Breitmeyer
-
- 02 4月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 26 2月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 14 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Konstantin Ritt 提交于
This code is C++ only. There isn't a single C++ compiler that fails to understand the "inline" keyword, since it's required by C++98. Any compiler older than C++98 is likely to choke on the template usage further down, so this isn't necessary. Moreover, the C++ standard says you cannot define macros. [lib.macro.names] says "Nor shall such a translation unit define macros for names lexically identical to keywords." -- technically, it's a promise that the Standard Library headers won't do it, the wording means that the entire translation unit won't do it, which implies no source can do it. MSVC complains about it: fatal error C1189: #error : The C++ Standard Library forbids macroizing keywords. Enable warning C4005 to find the forbidden macro. Author: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Konstantin Ritt 提交于
Just to keep Windows specific workarounds in a single place.
-
由 Konstantin Ritt 提交于
There is a _HBMemoryBarrier() wrapper function that emulates MemoryBarrier() behavior when it is not defined.
-
由 Konstantin Ritt 提交于
There is no environment (like WinCE) and the basic version of InitializeCriticalSection is unsupported. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92496/
-
- 13 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 15 10月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
- 01 10月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 16 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 13 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Report has it that it builds (and works) now: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92087/
-
- 11 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
As exercised by hb-coretext .notdef code.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Based on errors seen here: http://testresults.qt-project.org/ci/QtBase_dev_Integration/build_03837/wince70embedded-armv4i-msvc2008_Windows_7/log.txt.gz Fully untested.
-
- 07 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Apparently they are not (advertised as?) safe on BSD systems. We ignore the case of static libraries. Whitelisted on glibc, Android, and MSVC / mingw. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82246
-
- 25 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Some systems insist on -Wmissing-field-initializers. We have too many, by design. Fix a few easy ones.
-
- 21 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
- 20 7月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 18 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-