- 16 4月, 2011 11 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
This includes HB_DIRECTION_INVALID and HB_SCRIPT_INVALID. The INVALID will cause a "guess whatever from the text" in hb_shape(). While it's not ideal, it works better than the previous defaults at least (HB_DIRECTION_LTR and HB_SCRIPT_COMMON).
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
One should use hb_buffer_reset() really.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 15 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 14 4月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 13 4月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 12 4月, 2011 16 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
I really shall find a way to automate the test enumeration. Otherwise it's too easy to add a test and wrongly hook it up. Did it twice today.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
It's just sugar.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
The problem with HB_TAG_STR() was that it expected a string of size 4 exactly, and unlike hb_tag_from_string() it doesn't pad the tag with space characters. So, the new name is more appropriate.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Uses the glib testing framework. Wrote unit tests for hb-common.h types.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Never hurts.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Since we now assert thos in hb-private.h, the int types cannot be wrong. (Except for when someone else includes hb-common.h in a very broken configuration, but that's not our problem!) Plus, we don't use inline in the public headers, so remove that too.
-
- 11 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 08 4月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 07 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
That better matches OpenType spec. Note that we enable it for all Arabic-shaper scripts. Ie. we enable it by default for Syriac too, but the SyriacOT spec does not require it. I think this is a more useful compromise than special-casing for Arabic script alone.
-