1. 19 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 06 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 21 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  4. 01 9月, 2015 2 次提交
  5. 22 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  6. 21 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 27 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 24 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 18 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  10. 17 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 12 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  12. 01 7月, 2014 3 次提交
  13. 13 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  14. 10 6月, 2014 3 次提交
  15. 06 6月, 2014 1 次提交
    • B
      [indic] Don't reorder reph/pref if ligature was expanded · 832a6f99
      Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
      Normally if you want to, say, conditionally prevent a 'pref', you
      would use blocking contextual matching.  Some designers instead
      form the 'pref' form, then undo it in context.  To detect that
      we now also remember glyphs that went through MultipleSubst.
      
      In the only place that this is used, Uniscribe seems to only care
      about the "last" transformation between Ligature and Multiple
      substitions.  Ie. if you ligate, expand, and ligate again, it
      moves the pref, but if you ligate and expand it doesn't.  That's
      why we clear the MULTIPLIED bit when setting LIGATED.
      
      Micro-test added.  Test: U+0D2F,0D4D,0D30 with font from:
      
      [1]
      https://code.google.com/a/google.com/p/noto-alpha/issues/detail?id=186#c29
      832a6f99
  16. 03 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 30 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  18. 28 5月, 2014 6 次提交
  19. 24 5月, 2014 3 次提交
  20. 23 5月, 2014 7 次提交