- 22 2月, 2016 9 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
-
- 19 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Fixes https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/issues/223 Right now we cannot test this because it has to be tested using hb-fuzzer. We should move all fuzzing tests from test/shaping/tests/fuzzed.tests to test/fuzzing/ and have its own test runner. At that point, should add test from this issue as well.
-
- 18 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
- 16 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
This is what Microsoft's implementation does. Marks that need advance need to add it back using 'dist' or other feature in GPOS. Update tests to match.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Fixes https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/issues/211 What happens in that bug is that a mark is attached to base first, then a second mark is cursive-chained to the first mark. This only "works" because it's in the Indic shaper where mark advances are not zeroed. Before, we didn't allow cursive to run on marks at all. Fix that. We also where updating mark major offsets at the end of GPOS, such that changes in advance of base will not change the mark attachment position. That was superior to the alternative (which is what Uniscribe does BTW), but made it hard to apply cursive to the mark after it was positioned. We could track major-direction offset changes and apply that to cursive in the post process, but that's a much trickier thing to do than the fix here, which is to immediately apply the major-direction advance-width offsets... Ie.: https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/issues/211#issuecomment-183194739 If this breaks any fonts, the font should be fixed to do mark attachment after all the advances are set up first (kerning, etc). Finally, this, still doesn't make us match Uniscribe, for I explained in that bug. Looks like Uniscribe applies minor-direction cursive adjustment immediate as well. We don't, and we like it our way, at least for now. Eg. the sequence in the test case does this: - The first subscript attaches with mark-to-base, moving in x only, - The second subscript attaches with cursive attachment to first subscript moving in x only, - A final context rule moves the first subscript up by 104 units. The way we do, the final shift-up, also shifts up the second subscript mark because it's cursively-attached. Uniscribe doesn't. We get: [ttaorya=0+1307|casubscriptorya=0@-242,104+-231|casubscriptnarroworya=0@20,104+507] while Uniscribe gets: [ttaorya=0+1307|casubscriptorya=0@-242,104+-211|casubscriptnarroworya=0+487] note the different y-offset of the last glyph. In our view, after cursive, things move together, period.
-
- 12 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 11 2月, 2016 9 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No effect.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Part of fixing https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/issues/211
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Right now the position_finish_advances() is empty. To be used for spacing attachments proposal later.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Will do nothing. Just useful for merging two functions.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Differentiate, using new attach_type().
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No behavior change. Preparing to unify how cursive and mark attachments work.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Is confusing. I already hit it myself. Remove. We can optimize ASCII based on Unicode properties. But should not do based on assumptions on the font.
-
- 10 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
See thread at: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/harfbuzz/2016-February/005462.html
-
- 03 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chun-wei Fan 提交于
This adds to the autotools build system so that the (experimental) DirectWrite support for HarfBuzz is built (and dist'ed).
-
由 Chun-wei Fan 提交于
This moves all the source listings in src/Makefile.am, src/hb-ucdn/Makefile.am and util/Makefile.am into separate Makefile snippets, so that they may be shared between different Makefile-based build systems, such as NMake for Visual Studio.
-
- 02 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Hopefully fixes https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/issues/214
-
- 17 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Hosken 提交于
-
- 13 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
- 12 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
This speeds up shaping the Amiri font by over 15%. This was primarily needed for my work on OpenType GX, since we will be collecting only sublookups that are "active" for current font instance; but it's a nice boost in general as well. We might, in the future, collect subtables in the lookup_accel. That would also allow us to do a per-subtbale set-digest, which should speed things up some more, specially for ContextChainFormat3 lookups... Amiri, for example, contains one lookup with 53 subtables!
-
- 11 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
-
- 08 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Might add italic-angle, underline/strikethrough-position/thickness in the future. Do this before new struct goes into a release.
-
- 06 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
This happens with at least one test font I have.
-
- 05 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
See previous commit.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
The font Garamond Premier Pro Caption (and possibly many other Adobe fonts), have many FeatureParamsSize tables with the old wrong offset. We handle fixing those up, but they were still contributing to edit_count, and when I reduced HB_SANITIZE_MAX_EDIT from 100 to 8 in 14c2de32, these fonts were now getting GPOS dropped and hence kerning disabled. Fix, by not counting edits made towareds offset fix-up. I'll also increase edit count again, in the next commit.
-
- 02 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-